Please CC me directly as i'm not on the list.
I have attached a patch against latest CVS (cvs diff -u)
that adds the following functionality. I can break it up if
you would prefer it in pieces. Comments welcome.
o add compare-perms option
This creates a new inode for a
not be
linked between monday and tuesday even though the contents
haven't changed.
compare-perms only makes sense when you are using link-dest.
>
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 01:25:50PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> > Please CC me directly as i'm not on the list.
> >
>
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:41:07PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:05:14PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:45:04PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> > > I like link-dest, and the "-" for exclude-from/include-from was a
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 12:41:07PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:05:14PM -0800, jw schultz wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 03:45:04PM -0600, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> > > I like link-dest, and the "-" for exclude-from/include-from was a
Please CC me. I'm not subscribed.
Attached is a patch against 2.5.4pre1 CVS current to add the
--link-dest option so rsync will create hardlinks for
unchanged regular files to a directory on the destination.
This is like --compare-dest except that the result is not a
sparse tree.
Also included
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:44:34PM -0800, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 21 Mar 2002, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please CC me. I'm not subscribed.
> >
> > Attached is a patch against 2.5.4pre1 CVS current to add the
> > --link-dest option so rsync w
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 04:07:49AM +, Mike Rubel wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've found a simple, rsync-based trick to emulate the "rotating snapshots"
> feature found on some file servers, and hope that members of this group
> will find it useful and/or interesting:
>
> http://www.mikerubel.org
On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 07:23:38PM -0700, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 18 Apr 2002, Otto Wyss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since I uses rsync in a perl script I'd rather prefer to get error codes from
> > rsync instead of messages at STDOUT. Is there an option which tells rsync it
> > should return e
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 06:05:15AM -0700, Martin Pool wrote:
> Any thoughts?
>
> I have half a mind to turn it on by default, but I guess it's better
> not to.
I'm not sure what current behaviour is but I'd be inclined to
say that the default behaviour in this case should be to put a
copy of the
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 06:53:54PM -0400, Administrator wrote:
> I am trying to use rsync over ssh to a specific port and am having no luck. Any
>help would be greatly apprecaited.
>
> This is what I have:
>
> rsync --delete -rlogptvz -e ssh /tmp [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/safe/backup/
>
> If so
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 12:50:59PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2002, terrell Larson wrote:
> > The [option-specifying form] of the -e option is not documented.
> > IMHO it should be.
>
> I agree. I've whipped up the following patch for rsync.yo, which I
> will commit to CVS in a
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:16:27AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2002, jw schultz wrote:
> > Also the example is an odd one.
>
> It doesn't seem odd to me since the -l option is the one that I've used
> most in ssh (when I don't use the config
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:35:30AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> OK, I just checked in a change that uses some of your suggested text to
> remove a bit of the chattiness. I also improved the RSYNC_RSH section
> to mention the legality of command-line options. See if you like it
> better.
>
> --
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 01:42:31PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2002, Allen, John L. wrote:
> > In my humble opinion, this problem with rsync growing a huge memory
> > footprint when large numbers of files are involved should be #1 on
> > the list of things to fix.
>
> I have cert
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 12:47:00PM -0700, Matthias Munnich wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am using rsync for backup on the disks of a Linux backup server.
> Obviously the server could store more data it the data were
> compressed. I read the "rsync -> tar" thread. Unfortunately, a
> compressed file system fo
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 11:57:17AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just a few quick questions..
> Does rsync copy open files?
> If so, does file integrity remain intact?
> Im looking to backup IIS log files and maybe Oracle and SQL Server DB files. If
>rsync isnt appropriate, what would you
This whole discussion on the efficiency of rsyncing
pre-compressed files is probably pointless for Matthias
Munnich. He is trying to do backups. Therefore, he doesn't
want the originals compressed.
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:45:16PM -0500, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 04:03:56P
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:45:43AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:35:05PM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> [...]
> > > There is a patch available to gzip to add an option --rsyncable that's
> > > supposed to make it work better with r
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 06:27:27PM +0200, Dick Streefland wrote:
> On Thursday 2002-05-30 12:43, Michael Montero wrote:
> | That's great news. I believe this applies to me just fine and I
> | can turn off the checksum. Quick questioncan anyone explain to me
> | when the data in a file mi
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 08:51:26PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 05:25:15PM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> > On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 11:45:43AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:35:05PM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
[...]
> &g
On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 11:46:37PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 04:57:15AM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 08:51:26PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 05:25:15PM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> [...]
>
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 05:43:17PM +1000, Kevin Easton wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 05:18:42PM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 11:46:37PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jun 01, 2002 at 04:57:15AM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> &
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 11:42:12AM +0200, C.Zimmermann wrote:
> We need to encrypt files before transferring them to the destination
> Host for security reasons.
> Encryption must be strong: IDEA, 3DES or similar.
> One way would be the integration of PGP into rsync.
>
> Is there any PGP integra
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 12:21:18PM +0200, C.Zimmermann wrote:
> >
> > If you want them stored on the destination encrypted you
>
> Yes, that´s it. The owner of the source files will be sure, that no one
> else can read his files on the destination host.
>
> I thought, rsync only looks at the mo
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 06:45:44PM +0800, Adrian Ho wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 03:33:23AM -0700, 'jw schultz' wrote:
> > As you have said rsync normally just looks at the modification date
>
> And the file size. This check, to the best of my knowledge, cannot
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 01:22:28PM +0200, C.Zimmermann wrote:
>
> > >
> > >I thought, rsync only looks at the modification date of a file and
> > >decides whether to backup this file or not.
> > >
> > By default, it does not, in fact it's REAL usefullness it's that uit
> > examines the content
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 10:57:22PM +0200, Olivier Tarnus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I already wrote about this subject last month but didn't get attention...
>
> I've found a way to transfert acls with a script and applying them. This
> process has already been described in this mailing list
> (http://l
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 05:35:01PM +0800, Leaw, Chern Jian wrote:
> HI,
>
> I have a scenario where a filesystem i.e /fs13/m6.uecommon.1/wmt8/utils is
> residing on a fileserver i.e. fs13. Contents of this filesystem are as
> follows:
>
> # ls -l /fs13/m6.uecommon.1/wmt8/utils
> lrwxrwxrwx
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 12:24:20PM -0400, pyxl wrote:
> Well, it's definitely not in either of the man pages - and those should
> be the canonical documentation of rsync's behavior. But it's a small
> bug (with big teeth!).
>
> Corey Stup wrote:
>
> > pyxl wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Tr
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 03:26:51PM +0200, Mikael moshir wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am a french student and I have written a technical
> report on an extension of the rsync algorithm to crypted
> files. I started from the situation of a client machine A
> user who doesn't wish to save an original
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 02:21:08PM -0400, Granzow, Doug (NCI) wrote:
> We're planning to move to Veritas Volume Replicator. It has the advantage
> of working at the filesystem level, so whenever a write is done on the
> primary site, the same write is automatically done on the mirror site. For
>
I dislike flaming and i don't intend my comments as flame
but you have made some statements that at face value are
problematic. Perhaps you could correct my misunderstanding.
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 06:23:10PM +0200, Olivier Lachambre wrote:
> Hello,
> Another French student in the rsync maili
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 05:51:58PM -0600, Joel Votaw wrote:
>
> Attached is a patch that implements compressing output files as they're
> written to disk, uzing zlib. Thus far I've only used it with
> synchronizing directories on a single machine.
This certainly would be useful once reliable.
On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 11:10:13AM -0700, Eric Ziegast wrote:
> > I am two Linux servers with rsync server running on both. Now I am
> > replicating directories in both servers with the command rsync -avz
> > My requirement is, if I made any changs in the first server, say server
> > A, I w
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 06:01:48PM +0800, Adrian Ho wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:37:13PM +0800, Adrian Ho wrote:
> > I'm inclined to push for more flexibility with:
>
> Actually, make that:
>
> --post-send=
> --post-recv=
> Runs on the sender/receiver just before rsync exits.
>
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 09:18:18PM +0800, Adrian Ho wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 03:52:16AM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> > Also the path should not be fully qualified but instead should match
> > that of the commandline with cwd the same as the rsync launch.
>
> If the se
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 08:52:29AM -0700, Eric Horst wrote:
>
> Hi, I'm new around here and thought I'd join the discussion. Hope that's
> ok.
>
> > I'm inclined to push for more flexibility with:
> >
> > --post-process=
> > Runs on the receiver just before rsync exits.
> > is passe
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:56:57PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> Any thoughts on whether this should go in? I can see arguments either
> way. It seems like we ought to think about whether it would be better
> to do it as part of a generalized --chmod or --chmod-backup facility.
>
>
>
> On 21 Ju
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 05:40:58PM -0400, Lenny Foner wrote:
> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 21:18:18 +0800
> From: Adrian Ho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> If the sender's/receiver's cwd is guaranteed to be the root of the
> corresponding rsync'd hierarchies, then yes, relative paths would
>
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:03:25AM -0700, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 02:04:57PM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> > The default behavior should not modify files. The general
> > purpose is to have the copies be the same as the original.
> > A general --chmod or
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:50:00PM -0700, Rick Parada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Im running a Dell 6450 w/ 4GB of memory, 2 2GB Swap Partitions. Redhat 7.3
> kernel 2.4.18 (kernel.org). It runs our images for our site. We use rsync to
> sync images from a main image box. It runs fine for maybe 4 days until
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 01:52:15PM -0400, Dave North wrote:
> We have an interesting quandry here. When I'm rsync'ing my directory
> tree (100 directories each containing 1000 files) I see some strange
> results:
>
> All of these machines are on their own network segment (100t) in our QA
> lab
>
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 10:19:40AM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> Martin Pool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've put a cleaned-up version of my design notes up here
> > http://samba.org/~mbp/superlifter/design-notes.html
>
> I'll start with some feedback on your rzync comments:
>
> Re: rzync
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 02:00:21PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 21 Jul 2002, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > .From what i can see rsync is very clever. The biggest
> > problems i see with its inability to scale for large trees,
> > a little bit of accum
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:34:37PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 22 Jul 2002, "John E. Malmberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > If you structure the protocol processing where no subroutine ever posts
> > a write and then waits for a read, you can set up a library that can be
> > used eithe
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 04:31:51PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 21 Jul 2002, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That is the better approach. Use I/O routines so most
> > processing can be "while (get_input()) { process(); send_output()}"
> &
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 09:03:32AM -0400, Bennett Todd wrote:
> 2002-07-26-03:37:51 jw schultz:
> > All that matters is that we can represent the timestamps in
> > a way that allows consistent comparison, restoration and
> > transfer.
>
> A very good statement inde
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 02:50:52PM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> Lenny Foner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >jw schultz wrote:
> > I find the use of funny chars (including space) in filenames
> > offensive but we need to deal with internationalizatio
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 02:04:02PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, jw schultz wrote:
> > What i am seeing is a Multi-stage pipeline.
>
> This is quite an interesting design idea. Let me comment on a few
> things that I've been mulling over since fir
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 05:39:22PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 27 Jul 2002, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The server has no need to deal with cleint limitations. I
> > am saying that the protocol would make the bare minimum of
> > limitatons (null ter
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 12:40:56PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 28 Jul 2002, Michael Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > rsync does not sync the timestamp on symlink (Solaris 8).
> >
> > It is probablly due to the limitation of Unix implementation
> > of symlink, but I would like to know why rs
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 12:00:21AM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
> To help explain why the backup and file distribution have such different
> implementation issues, let me give some background.
>
>
> This is a dump of an OpenVMS native text file. This is the format that
> virtually all text
Updated to current cvs without the --exclude-from - patch.
This patch allows specifying a --link-dest path similar to
--compare-dest except that unchanged files are hard-linked to the
--link-dest path instead of producing a sparse tree.
--
This patch causes --exclude-from and --include-from to read
from STDIN when given - for a filename.
This was formerly incorporated in my --link-dest patch.
Patch against current cvs.
--
J.W. SchultzPegasystem
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:03:00PM -0500, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> Yes I think a new release is needed soon, but there's more patches than
> that that should get in. A bunch of them have been posted and I was hoping
> you were keeping track of them and would be putting more of them in.
To put in my
On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 08:44:00AM -0700, S Peram wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to use rsync from Windows to Unix.
> I've followed the directions on :
> http://optics.ph.unimelb.edu.au/help/rsync/rsync_pc1.html
Start by reading the manpage. Look first in the GENERAL
section where it lists the 6 (so
On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 12:50:04AM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
> On 31 Jul 2002, Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yes I think a new release is needed soon, but there's more patches than
> > that that should get in.
>
> We need to weigh up getting functions in vs making steps small e
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 12:08:39PM +0200, Scheufen Stephan wrote:
> Hello Rsync PRO´s,
>
> i´m satisfied with the rsync features...never seen a better replication tool!!
>;-)
>
> But i have some problems...:-(
> OK, here me installation:
> - one Compac Proliant ML370 with cached SCSI HDDs a
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 08:57:11AM -, Mahesh Chandra Patil wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Greetings to all.
>
> I am a newbie to rsync. I have a problem,for which I could not
> find the solution in Rsync Faq o Matiq. Even google couldnt give
> any solution. So finally I am here..
>
> Currently
e you are using gnu find. With gnu find and
bash this will work:
COM='$(find '$src_dir' -mtime -'$days' -type f -printf "\'%p\' ")'
Just make sure the quotes get through intact.
This gets find to put quotes around each pathname and $()
keeps them
On Fri, Aug 30, 2002 at 02:49:21PM -0500, Dave Dykstra wrote:
> Oh, syncing from a pipe on one end to a file on the other end is a
> different story. That I can see a use for. However, it's not really what
> the rsync command is designed for; it's designed for handling lots of
> files. I would
To start with, use the carrage return and don't send html.
This sounds like a problem that was fixed a few months ago.
You might try searching archives. Upgrade to current
(2.5.5) or the CVS tree.
And please send any changes as diff -u against up-to-date
CVS (see diff(1) and patch(1)) encoded
it is probably safest to attach them as
text/plain if can't be sure what your mailer will do to
whitespace. (i see you use Notes and Outlook)
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 05:00:02PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> JW,
>
> I pushed everything to a LINUX box and did the diff again this time with the
> -bur option.
> It does look significantly different. I think I've got below what you are
> looking for, so I am
> resending it to [EMAIL
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 01:08:48PM -0700, Trevor Marshall wrote:
> I have been trying to implement Mike's tutorial on backup with rsync, but
> my server has kept crashing in the middle of the rsync transfer.
>
> I am backing up /dev/hda1 to /dev/hdc1 on a SuSe v 7.3 i386 box
>
> Server cras
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 06:03:05PM -0700, Trevor Marshall wrote:
> Dear JW,
> I spent hours checking and upgrading my hardware. There is nothing wrong
> with it. It is a 'mature' Pentium-II 400MHz system that has been running my
> servers WITHOUT ANY CRASHES for nearly 2 years now 24/7
>
> Listen
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 06:29:33PM -0700, Trevor Marshall wrote:
> Jw,
> Respectfully,
> My experience is to shy away from any piece of software which the
> developers feel is inviolate
>
> Although often the hardware and kernel certainly could be at fault it is
> wrong to assume they are, and su
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 08:07:48PM +0200, Bruno LEDOUX wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question about security with rsync which I want to use to do
> automatic backups of a cvs tree. I have two options: the first one is to use
> rsync with ssh but it requires me to type in my ssh password each time an
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 04:55:30PM +1000, Damon Atkins wrote:
>
> 1. Large 1 MB I/O, all reads and write to file systems
> 1MB (can use setvbuf to do this with out coding)
> e.g a awk programme doing 8K I/O to read 2GB file
> took 16 min, a perl programme doing 1MB I/O took 16
> seconds.
Large
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:35:04AM +, Theo van der Merwe wrote:
> Is it possible to make a complete image (or clone) of your hard drive (FAT
> or NTFS) using rsync?
No. rsync will copy the files and directory structure. It
doesn't copy the filesystem/partition. Further, rsync runs
under c
On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 12:15:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to log whatever happens with rsync on client side when it runs
> with Cygwin on NT4.
> First, I just did a redirect of the screen output to a log-file:
>
> rsync -rtv --delete --modify-window=2 --stats /cyg
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 05:59:58PM +0200, Pascal Bourguignon wrote:
>
> Jason Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Mac OS X provides support for the Mac file system resource forks and
> > > mac specific metadata (e.g., creator and file type). Most Unix
> > > applications ignore this informati
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 10:02:18AM +0100, Riq Willitts wrote:
> I am using rsync 2.5.5 running as a daemon on the destination system, which
> is SuSE Linux 8.0. The source system is SuSE 7.3, also with rsync 2.5.5.
> With the default 'use chroot = true' and not using --numeric-ids, I get
> the
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:38:14AM +1000, Brad Hards wrote:
> The attached patch adds "first draft" support for service location protocol,
> using OpenSLP (http://www.openslp.org). This allows you to automagically
> discover all the rsync servers on your network (which is defined in terms of
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 06:03:12PM -0700, Gwendal Stevanazzi wrote:
>
> Here is the structure of my servers :
>
> Source :
>
> /home/test1/link_dir
> sub_dir1
> file1
> file2
> ...
> sub_dir2
>
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:28:02AM -0700, Gwendal Stevanazzi wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, jw schultz wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 06:03:12PM -0700, Gwendal Stevanazzi wrote:
> > >
> > > Now I want to update file1.
> > > If I run the command
> >
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 07:29:40PM +0900, Anthony Heading wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 01:06:22PM -0700, Sudheer Tumuluru wrote:
> >
> > I am having the same problem with rsync 2.5.5-1. I am
> > trying to rsync a couple of short text files between a linux server and
> > Win2k Professional
[edited]
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 12:52:58PM -0700, Gwendal Stevanazzi wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Here's the script:
> > rsync dira/file dirc
>
> This script runs ok
> But here is a script which doesn't work for me:
> rsync -R dira/file ../dest/
The culprit appears t
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 12:41:55AM +0200, Gregor Waluga wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've read the manpage, but I got a simple question on the expression "base
> directory" used in the "exclude patterns"-section.
> When I synchronize ie:
>
> rsync -avzu /home/gregor/ notebook:/home/gregor/
>
> and want to
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 07:26:44AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I am just starting to use rsync and now have an rsync
> server set up to back up our various machines. I recently
> started getting an error that is confusing and I can't
> find info documented on it. I searched the n
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 04:50:32PM +0200, David Bigagli -Bokis- wrote:
>
> Would it help to build with SunPro cc compiler using the -xarch=v9
> option? This will build a native 64 bit binary.
Not likely. If i correctly diagnosed his problem it is the
syscall/library interface and datatypes. Th
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 01:09:16PM -0700, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
> > Yeah, you're fine, as long as, as you say, no two sessions are accessing
> > the same objects. Even then, rsync handles it fairly well...
>
> Can you elaborate on this?
>
> Below is message I sent a while ago, but
On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 10:45:44PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> In conclusion, a blocksize of 700 with the current 48bit signature blocksum
> has an unacceptable failure rate (>5%) for any file larger than 100M, unless
> the file being synced is almost identical.
>
> Increasing the blocksize wi
On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 12:32:42PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 11:13:50AM -0700, Derek Simkowiak wrote:
> > > My theory is that this is expected behavior given the check sum size.
> >
> > Craig,
> > Excellent analysis!
>
> I was a bit concerned about his maths
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 02:25:00AM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 06:22:36AM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 10:45:44PM +1000, Donovan Baarda wrote:
> [...]
> > > Does the first pass signature block checksum really only use 2 byte
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 03:38:29PM -0400, Karl Wieman wrote:
> If I remove a directory 'foo' and create a file foo, and then do a resync from a
>remote server
>
> with the -u flag, the file will be replaced by the directory, even though
>
> the file is newer than the directory. Is this a bug,
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:20:30PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to synchronize a part of the source file with a part of the
> destination file. In detail I would like to
>- synchronize a file on a remote host from line "n" onwards with the
> file content on the
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 05:00:02PM -0400, Farid Shenassa wrote:
> 1. is there any computational or disk IO difference between the rsync client
> and server (the one that does just the checksum on the block, vs the one
> that does rolling checksum). Given that I do not have as much cpu on the
> VO
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 08:58:29AM -0700, Jennifer Lu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> How many characters of the file name can be transferred thru rsync?
> 255? I am running rsync on solaris 5.8 machine, I got the following
> error messages:
>
> ERROR: dsync: dsync1:/import/data/ to dsync2:/import/data2/
> m
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:37:45AM -0500, Crowder, Mark wrote:
> Yes, I've read the FAQ, just hoping for a boon...
>
> I'm in the process of relocating a large amount of data from one nfs server
> to another (Network Appliance filers). The process I've been using is to
> nfs mount both source and
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:34:42AM +0200, Michael Salmon wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 22, 2002 09:46:36 AM +0900 Shinichi Maruyama
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +--
> |
> | jw> In the past i found that using find was quite good for this.
> | jw> Use touch to create a file with a mod_time just
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 04:40:48AM -0400, Tripp Lilley wrote:
>
> >From TODO:
>
> We can also have the case where there are links to a file that are
> not in the tree being transferred. There's nothing we can do about
> that. Because we rename the destination into place after writing,
>
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:16:26PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've just tried to do a backup of a machine with rsync. While doing this
> (I was reading emails:-) I noted that mbox for mbox, I had no longe new
> mails, but I've never read off these mailboxes lately... This seemed to
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:19:40PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-10-24 04:04:14 -0700, jw schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:16:26PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> > > I think &#x
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:55:58PM +0200, Philipp W. wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'mn quiet new to rsync... i'm usig it for making bakups over internet.
> What i'd like is to add som other output-possibilities...
Boy, everybody and his brother are doing this now!
> What's in my interest is, how many bytes
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 12:22:05AM +0200, Milan Kr?m?? wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 06:03:56PM -0700, jw schultz wrote:
> > You might look at dirvish http://www.pegasys.ws/dirvish It
> > manages a complete rotation schedule with images preserved
> > for various periods.
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:29:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am using rsync to sync filesystems from one Solaris
> machine to another at a remote site. Everything sync's
> fine, except for the ownership preservation. The
> permissions all get transferred correctly and so do all the
> file
On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 09:44:38PM +0300, Kauko Heikkila wrote:
> 1.From SuSe Linux Enterpise server to another one:
> rsync -trvuz -e ssh file.wrk uname@servername:uname-html
> works wierdly since file.wrk changes
> to a file named uname-html in the user's "uname" home.
It did as you told it. t
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 12:38:03PM +0300, Kauko Heikkila wrote:
> Thanks for the answer. I fully appreciate.
>
> And in a way I admit what you said,
> but if you think of the command
>
> rsync -trvuz file.wrk uname@servername::uname-html
>
> what it does, then according to my logic
>
> rsync
Please put your comments either interleaved or at the end
and quote the minimum. This is normal mailing-list
netiquette per RFC.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 04:33:54PM +0300, Kauko Heikkila wrote:
>
> One more, serious problem exists, since
> when invoked from a w2000 laptop
> (servername is still t
1 - 100 of 980 matches
Mail list logo
