[Bug 10963] rsync to multiple destinations

2020-07-26 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10963

Wayne Davison  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX

--- Comment #6 from Wayne Davison  ---
I'd suggest creating a helper script that then does a loop and runs rsync
several times.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


[Bug 10963] rsync to multiple destinations

2014-11-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10963

--- Comment #1 from Dave Yost d...@yost.com ---
Something like this would be useful:
  rsync foo s1: --add-destinations s2:dir s3:dir
or
  rsync foo s1: --to s1: s2:dir s3:~

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


[Bug 10963] rsync to multiple destinations

2014-11-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10963

--- Comment #2 from Kevin Korb rs...@sanitarium.net ---
These would be separate rsync (and ssh) connections.  What use case would
justify bundling them together into a single rsync session?  The only benefit
over multiple exections of rsync would be a lack of per-session error handling.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


[Bug 10963] rsync to multiple destinations

2014-11-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10963

--- Comment #3 from Dave Yost d...@yost.com ---
What I'm after is an argument syntax that supports copying to multiple
destinations.

It's fine by me if rsync executes a multiple-destination command via multiple,
sequential copies.

I am not advocating an incompatible change that would require a --to argument
even for a single destination.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Re: [Bug 10963] rsync to multiple destinations

2014-11-25 Thread Joe
How would this be different/better than
rsync options source {dest1 dest2 dest3}

? (The brackets cause bash to repeat the command line for each argument
inside the brackets.)

The only thing I can see is what Kevin pointed out about figuring out
which transfer was involved if an error condition results, but this
would probably also be the case with the requested option.

If there was some advantage to running them in parallel, throwing an
ampersand on the end of the command line would probably do it.

Joe

On 11/25/2014 06:00 PM, samba-b...@samba.org wrote:
 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10963

 --- Comment #1 from Dave Yost d...@yost.com ---
 Something like this would be useful:
   rsync foo s1: --add-destinations s2:dir s3:dir
 or
   rsync foo s1: --to s1: s2:dir s3:~



-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


[Bug 10963] rsync to multiple destinations

2014-11-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10963

--- Comment #4 from Kevin Korb rs...@sanitarium.net ---
If you want to run them in parallel then use gnu parallel.  It would keep the
specified unmber of jobs running until it runs out of new jobs.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


[Bug 10963] rsync to multiple destinations

2014-11-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10963

--- Comment #5 from Dave Yost d...@yost.com ---
This is not about running them in parallel.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html