[Bug 8265] Various corruption of devices and sockets

2020-07-26 Thread just subscribed for rsync-qa from bugzilla via rsync
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8265

Wayne Davison  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #12 from Wayne Davison  ---
I found a bug in the handling of the hard-linked data where the sender sets the
rdev_major value for hard-linked devices, but the receiver did not.  So,
hopefully this fixes the case where the major rdev number was getting set
wrong.

If there are other issues, either start one or more new bugs on GitHub or add
more information here.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


[Bug 8265] Various corruption of devices and sockets

2013-06-03 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8265

--- Comment #11 from grarp...@gmail.com 2013-06-03 07:11:56 UTC ---
Way back then... I think I modified the patch a bit, ran against just a few
files in a dir, and reconfirmed it. The workproduct is still here somewhere...
a bet from memory says don't close this till someone can recheck. Perhaps me
when that box gets rebuilt.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


[Bug 8265] Various corruption of devices and sockets

2013-06-02 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8265

--- Comment #10 from Wayne Davison way...@samba.org 2013-06-02 23:42:21 UTC 
---
Any more info on this?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


[Bug 8265] Various corruption of devices and sockets

2011-07-08 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8265

--- Comment #9 from grarp...@gmail.com 2011-07-08 07:59:07 UTC ---
 assignment to it is instrumented with DEBUG 5

yes, seems there was such an assignment. i'll have that and
at least gdb to post when at keyboard next week. thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


[Bug 8265] Various corruption of devices and sockets

2011-06-26 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8265

--- Comment #8 from Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net 2011-06-26 16:11:35 
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
 Not sure if the patch is ok, rsync stalls in some different cases
 and needs ctrl-c.

As you can see, all the patch does is add print statements, so the hang must be
the result of a timing-dependent bug that was triggered by the addition of the
debug output.

 # rsync -nHaxi --delete /dev/ ./empty/
 ...
 [sender] i=4302 /dev zs0 mode=020600 len=0 uid=0 gid=0 flags=0
 [sender] i=4303 /dev fd/ mode=040555 len=1024 uid=0 gid=0 flags=4
 send_file_list done
 file list sent
 
 ^C[sender] _exit_cleanup(code=20, file=rsync.c, line=549): entered
 rsync error: received SIGINT, SIGTERM, or SIGHUP (code 20) at rsync.c(549)
 [sender=3.0.8]
 [sender] _exit_cleanup(code=20, file=rsync.c, line=549): about to call 
 exit(20)
 rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 96 bytes to socket [Receiver]: 
 Broken
 pipe (32)
 
 DEBUG 9: make_file(./fd1.1440): major(tmp_rdev) = 9
 DEBUG 1: send_file_entry(fd1.1440): major(rdev) = 9
 DEBUG 3: send_file_entry(fd1.1440): XMIT_SAME_RDEV_MAJOR
 DEBUG 9: make_file(./rfd1.1440): major(tmp_rdev) = 9
 DEBUG 1: send_file_entry(rfd1.1440): major(rdev) = 9
 DEBUG 6: recv_file_entry(fd1.1440): XMIT_SAME_RDEV_MAJOR, rdev_major was 3

Well that's interesting, the receiver's rdev_major value got out of sync with
the sender's.  recv_file_entry::rdev_major is zero-initialized and the only
assignment to it is instrumented with DEBUG 5, so unless you redacted a
previous device with major number 3 from the output, the value 3 could only
appear via memory corruption.

The fastest way to find the problem is probably to use a gdb watchpoint, like
this:

$ gdb --args rsync -nHaxi --delete /dev/ ./empty/
(gdb) set follow-fork-mode child
(gdb) watch recv_file_entry::rdev_major
(gdb) run
...
(gdb) bt

You could also try running rsync under valgrind if convenient.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


[Bug 8265] Various corruption of devices and sockets

2011-06-25 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8265

--- Comment #7 from grarp...@gmail.com 2011-06-26 02:17:04 UTC ---
Hi :) Patch 6397 and 6626, configure, compiles, and exec's ok.
Here's the build log...

rsync.c:378: warning: unused parameter `fnamecmp'
generator.c:216: warning: `desc' might be used uninitialized in this function
generator.c:622: warning: unused parameter `fname'
generator.c:665: warning: unused parameter `fnamecmp'
generator.c:1112: warning: `type' might be used uninitialized in this function
sender.c:143: warning: unused parameter `fname'
sender.c:143: warning: unused parameter `file'
io.c:470: warning: unused parameter `convert'


I remade the entire real /dev to make sure nothing crept in over
the years, rebooted, still broken. Also ran a few tar's of / | sha1
to make sure that all the kernel stuff is reliably readable, it is.


Not sure if the patch is ok, rsync stalls in some different cases
and needs ctrl-c. Search stall below.

Empty is an empty dir, full is a freshly MAKEDEV'd dir.


### With patch 6397 and 6626, both cases stall.
# Additionally, in both cases, --no-i-r stalls.
# DEBUG is without --no-i-r.
# rsync -nHaxi --delete /dev/ ./empty/
...
[sender] i=4302 /dev zs0 mode=020600 len=0 uid=0 gid=0 flags=0
[sender] i=4303 /dev fd/ mode=040555 len=1024 uid=0 gid=0 flags=4
send_file_list done
file list sent

^C[sender] _exit_cleanup(code=20, file=rsync.c, line=549): entered
rsync error: received SIGINT, SIGTERM, or SIGHUP (code 20) at rsync.c(549)
[sender=3.0.8]
[sender] _exit_cleanup(code=20, file=rsync.c, line=549): about to call exit(20)
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 96 bytes to socket [Receiver]: Broken
pipe (32)

DEBUG 9: make_file(./fd1.1440): major(tmp_rdev) = 9
DEBUG 1: send_file_entry(fd1.1440): major(rdev) = 9
DEBUG 3: send_file_entry(fd1.1440): XMIT_SAME_RDEV_MAJOR
DEBUG 9: make_file(./rfd1.1440): major(tmp_rdev) = 9
DEBUG 1: send_file_entry(rfd1.1440): major(rdev) = 9
DEBUG 6: recv_file_entry(fd1.1440): XMIT_SAME_RDEV_MAJOR, rdev_major was 3
DEBUG 7: recv_file_entry(fd1.1440): after assembly, major(rdev) = 3
DEBUG 8: recv_file_entry(fd1.1440): DEV_MAJOR(F_RDEV_P(file)) = 3
DEBUG 4: recv_file_entry(rfd1.1440): took major(rdev) = 3 from previous file
fd1.1440
DEBUG 8: recv_file_entry(rfd1.1440): DEV_MAJOR(F_RDEV_P(file)) = 3

# rsync -nHaxi --delete /dev/ ./full/
...
[sender] i=4302 /dev zs0 mode=020600 len=0 uid=0 gid=0 flags=0
[sender] i=4303 /dev fd/ mode=040555 len=1024 uid=0 gid=0 flags=4
send_file_list done
file list sent

^C[sender] _exit_cleanup(code=20, file=rsync.c, line=549): entered
rsync error: received SIGINT, SIGTERM, or SIGHUP (code 20) at rsync.c(549)
[sender=3.0.8]
[sender] _exit_cleanup(code=20, file=rsync.c, line=549): about to call exit(20)
rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 96 bytes to socket [Receiver]: Broken
pipe (32)

DEBUG 9: make_file(./fd1.1440): major(tmp_rdev) = 9
DEBUG 1: send_file_entry(fd1.1440): major(rdev) = 9
DEBUG 3: send_file_entry(fd1.1440): XMIT_SAME_RDEV_MAJOR
DEBUG 9: make_file(./rfd1.1440): major(tmp_rdev) = 9
DEBUG 1: send_file_entry(rfd1.1440): major(rdev) = 9
DEBUG 6: recv_file_entry(fd1.1440): XMIT_SAME_RDEV_MAJOR, rdev_major was 3
DEBUG 7: recv_file_entry(fd1.1440): after assembly, major(rdev) = 3
DEBUG 8: recv_file_entry(fd1.1440): DEV_MAJOR(F_RDEV_P(file)) = 3
DEBUG 4: recv_file_entry(rfd1.1440): took major(rdev) = 3 from previous file
fd1.1440
DEBUG 8: recv_file_entry(rfd1.1440): DEV_MAJOR(F_RDEV_P(file)) = 3


### With only patch 6397, stalls on empty case.
# In both cases, --no-i-r does not stall.
# rsync -nHaxi --delete /dev/ ./empty/
...
recv_files(fd/8)
recv_files(fd/9)

^C[sender] _exit_cleanup(code=20, file=rsync.c, line=549): entered
rsync error: received SIGINT, SIGTERM, or SIGHUP (code 20) at rsync.c(549)
[sender=3.0.8]
[sender] _exit_cleanup(code=20, file=rsync.c, line=549): about to call exit(20)

# rsync -nHaxi --delete /dev/ ./full/
...
recv_files(fd/8)
recv_files(fd/9)
recv_files phase=1
generate_files phase=2
send_files phase=2
send files finished
total: matches=0  hash_hits=0  false_alarms=0 data=0
recv_files phase=2
generate_files phase=3
recv_files finished
generate_files finished
client_run waiting on 19840

sent 72365 bytes  received 18680 bytes  9583.68 bytes/sec
total size is 49778  speedup is 0.55 (DRY RUN)
[sender] _exit_cleanup(code=0, file=main.c, line=1052): entered
[sender] _exit_cleanup(code=0, file=main.c, line=1052): about to call exit(0)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
-- 
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html