Re: rsync recursion question

2001-10-24 Thread tim . conway
: Re: rsync recursion question Classification

Re: rsync recursion question

2001-10-24 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 09:08:25PM -0500, Justin Banks wrote: Tim == tim conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Tim That's the way it is. If it's really a one-off change, a huge change Tim in your structure, telnet ssh, rsh, and so forth, work really well for Tim dropping in and deleting

RE: rsync recursion question

2001-10-24 Thread David Bolen
Justin Banks [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes: If your suggestion worked, that would be just fine with me. Actually, I guess it's fine anyway, I'll just have to maintain my patch ;) This is probably obvious, but just in case it isn't, CVS makes this fairly trivial (importing the main rsync

Re: rsync recursion question

2001-10-24 Thread Dave Dykstra
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 02:26:29PM -0500, Justin Banks wrote: Dave == Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dave The filename paths that the exclude algorithm sees are relative to the Dave destination path, they do not include it. It should work if you use Dave --include /bob**.

Re: rsync recursion question

2001-10-23 Thread tim . conway
That's the way it is. If it's really a one-off change, a huge change in your structure, telnet ssh, rsh, and so forth, work really well for dropping in and deleting stuff (unless you're supplying the master, and other systems out of your control copy from you). Rsync is optimized for taking