[Bug 10449] New: Allow testing of supported parameter(s)

2014-02-14 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10449 Summary: Allow testing of supported parameter(s) Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5

Re: Beta testing a native win32 rsync client with auto sync

2012-01-18 Thread Konstantinos Skarlatos
On Τετάρτη, 18 Ιανουάριος 2012 4:58:21 πμ, Gang Chen wrote: Hi, there, We implemented a native win32 rsync client with auto synchronizer: http://www.acrosync.net We are currently looking for beta testers. If anyone is interested, please post a request in the forum

Beta testing a native win32 rsync client with auto sync

2012-01-17 Thread Gang Chen
Hi, there, We implemented a native win32 rsync client with auto synchronizer: http://www.acrosync.net We are currently looking for beta testers. If anyone is interested, please post a request in the forum (http://forum.acrosync.net) to receive a download link. Thanks, Acrosync Team --

Passed all tests with flying colors on Mac OS X 10.4.11 - synopsis of installation and testing

2008-03-03 Thread Rob Rye
and all those who have tested and refined this. I confess I am one of the myriad freeloaders who have been sitting back waiting for all of you to do the heavy lifting. I am a frequent beta tester on many open source projects, but I just don't have the guts to participate in such testing

Re: Passed all tests with flying colors on Mac OS X 10.4.11 - synopsis of installation and testing

2008-03-03 Thread Anthony Morton
I am running MacOS X 10.4.11 on PPC. The following is a synopsis of my installation procedure (as gathered from the various emails in the archive) - note that I had trouble with crtimes.diff and went back to osx-create-time.diff. Please let me know if I have included anything spurious or

Re: Passed all tests with flying colors on Mac OS X 10.4.11 - synopsis of installation and testing

2008-03-03 Thread Anthony Morton
I think you hit the nail on the head. I put the crtimes.diff first because I was simply swapping it in for osx-create-time.diff in Axel's email 3.0.0 test failure MacOS X 10.4.11. Upon invoking make, this error in the ordering of the patches, on my part yielded: Check the output of your

Re: testing rsync 2.6.3pre1

2004-08-17 Thread Paul Slootman
. For those that missed it, here is the I also missed the security announcement on the same day... Has the rsync list setup changed? I guess I'll have to subscribe to -announce as well... I'd appreciate it if people would let me know about any testing they do, even if it's just to say that things

testing rsync 2.6.3pre1

2004-08-16 Thread Wayne Davison
of the announcement: -- I have released rsync 2.6.3pre1 -- the first pre-release version of 2.6.3. Please help out with the testing so that the code gets a good workout before 2.6.3 is released. Thanks! To see what has changed

testing QA aliases

2004-06-30 Thread Gerald (Jerry) Carter
please ignore. -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

2.6.2 on Cygwin - initial testing results

2004-05-03 Thread Jim Salter
I compiled and installed rsync 2.6.2 from source (the site's download page) today, under Cygwin 1.5.9-1 / Windows 2000 Professional SP4. Initial testing shows that it operates properly and smoothly, and that Wayne's bugfix for the daemon mode / --backup problem I reported earlier did the trick

Testing new subscriber

2003-11-25 Thread Johan
Hi, Testing if working -- Johan May this be a good day for learning Registered Linux User #330034 - still learning -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-27 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:28:32PM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:09:59PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: On 17 Jun 2003, Rogier Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oops. Missed one line in the last patch Thankyou. That looks good. If we're going to make this

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-27 Thread Ben Escoto
jws == jw schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following on Fri, 27 Jun 2003 19:49:22 -0700 jws Long term, i think the bwlimit stuff needs a complete jws reexamination. In addition to the sleeping times and spreading jws the load as in the smoother bandwidth limiting but also its jws

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-18 Thread Martin Pool
On 17 Jun 2003, Rogier Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oops. Missed one line in the last patch Thankyou. That looks good. If we're going to make this more accurate it might be worthwhile to actually look at how long we really did sleep for, and use that to adjust time_to_sleep rather than

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-18 Thread Rogier Wolff
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:09:59PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: On 17 Jun 2003, Rogier Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oops. Missed one line in the last patch Thankyou. That looks good. If we're going to make this more accurate it might be worthwhile to actually look at how long we

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-18 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:09:59PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: On 17 Jun 2003, Rogier Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oops. Missed one line in the last patch Thankyou. That looks good. If we're going to make this more accurate it might be worthwhile to actually look at how long we

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-18 Thread Martin Pool
On 18 Jun 2003, jw schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:09:59PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: On 17 Jun 2003, Rogier Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oops. Missed one line in the last patch Thankyou. That looks good. If we're going to make this more

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-18 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:28:32PM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:09:59PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: On 17 Jun 2003, Rogier Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oops. Missed one line in the last patch Thankyou. That looks good. If we're going to make this

Re: Oops more testing was required....

2003-06-18 Thread jw schultz
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 01:52:10PM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 04:26:48AM -0700, jw schultz wrote: On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:09:59PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote: On 17 Jun 2003, Rogier Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oops. Missed one line in the last patch

2nd release of my new-protocol testing app

2002-06-13 Thread Wayne Davison
I've been having a lot of fun improving my new-protocol testing app. It's seems to be in pretty good shape (for test code), so I figured I'd announce another release for those brave souls that may want to help me in my thinking about a (potential) new rsync protocol. It's a tar.gz file this time

Re: 2nd release of my new-protocol testing app

2002-06-13 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, Wayne Davison wrote: http://www.clari.net/~wayne/rzync.tar.gz I forgot to mention that I changed the order of the local/remote args to the 2-arg version of the cd command to be cd LOCAL REMOTE (the command cd DIR still changes both the local and remote sides). This

Testing a transfer-only rsync tool

2002-06-01 Thread Wayne Davison
I found some time in the past week to work on a simple test app that would hopefully help to answer a few questions that came up recently: 1. Can a single-process generator+receiver work well? (Looks good so far, but I haven't run any multi-processor timing tests yet.) 2. How easy is it to

Re: symmetric mirroring (was testing)

2002-04-30 Thread Michael Salmon
On Thursday, April 25, 2002 07:34:47 PM -0500 Rich Winkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +-- | Sorry for the junk mail, it seems my last post was lost in the ether, | despite being successfully delivered to lists.samba.org (!) | Very frustrating, since I didn't keep a copy of it. | | My question

testing

2002-04-25 Thread Rich Winkel
123 -- To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

symmetric mirroring (was testing)

2002-04-25 Thread Rich Winkel
Sorry for the junk mail, it seems my last post was lost in the ether, despite being successfully delivered to lists.samba.org (!) Very frustrating, since I didn't keep a copy of it. My question was regarding what might be called symmetric mirroring, where two sets of identical files, both being

Re: symmetric mirroring (was testing)

2002-04-25 Thread Martin Pool
On 25 Apr 2002, Rich Winkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for the junk mail, it seems my last post was lost in the ether, despite being successfully delivered to lists.samba.org (!) Very frustrating, since I didn't keep a copy of it. My question was regarding what might be called symmetric

Re: symmetric mirroring (was testing)

2002-04-25 Thread Rich Winkel
Hi Martin, I guess I need to be more specific. I have a unix user who has unix machines at home and at work. He wants local access to the same set of files whether he's at home or at work. If each side updates a non-overlapping set of files you can do this using --update to push only the