This, with the "-config openssl.cnf" option to the below command, solve the
problem.
Thanks!
Zax
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 14:55, Julian Pace Ross
wrote:
> Try putting attached file in the same dir as openssl.exe
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Martyniuk wrote:
>
>> Hi Shachar,
>>
>> I'
For the same reason I have a compiling version of 1.06 that has been patched
with most of the changes between 1.06 and 1.12... In this way I have a
'portable' version with more or less the latest bug fixes and features...
Email me if you're interested.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Piotr Marty
Try putting attached file in the same dir as openssl.exe
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Piotr Martyniuk wrote:
> Hi Shachar,
>
> I'm trying to generate the public key using openssl as it is written in the
> attached rsyncrypto.html file:
>
> openssl req -nodes -newkey rsa:1536 -x509 -keyout bac
Hi Shachar,
I'm trying to generate the public key using openssl as it is written in the
attached rsyncrypto.html file:
openssl req -nodes -newkey rsa:1536 -x509 -keyout backup.key -out backup.crt
Unfortunately when I do this I'm getting below error:
Unable to load config info from /usr/local/ss
2009/2/18 Julian Pace Ross :
> That would be great... if anything, definitely for the executable... not
> sure whether you'd want to have two streams of sources to maintain though...
> In any case I obviously have no problem with uploading the whole lot...
>
You can make it a branch but is it real
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:03, Julian Pace Ross
wrote:
> Don't think it's a good idea... there should just be one version to avoid
> confusion.
>
Maybe with some info on the project web page this could work. :)
Regards,
Zax
That would be great... if anything, definitely for the executable... not
sure whether you'd want to have two streams of sources to maintain though...
In any case I obviously have no problem with uploading the whole lot...
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Piotr Martyniuk w
Piotr Martyniuk wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:03, Julian Pace Ross
> mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Don't think it's a good idea... there should just be one version
> to avoid confusion.
>
>
> Maybe with some info on the project web page this could work. :)
It's a
Don't think it's a good idea... there should just be one version to avoid
confusion.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Piotr Martyniuk wrote:
> Maybe it would be possible to store your version on the sourceforge as
> well, so more people could use your version.
>
> Regards,
> Zax
>
> On Wed, Feb
Maybe it would be possible to store your version on the sourceforge as well,
so more people could use your version.
Regards,
Zax
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:51, Julian Pace Ross
wrote:
> For the same reason I have a compiling version of 1.06 that has been
> patched with most of the changes betwee
Hi Shachar,
The answer is actually in the archives.
Yes, I found it now.
> I switched to a new compiler (Visual Studio 9), and it requires runtime
> libraries that can only be installed with an installer. As such, I switched
> the entire distribution to an installer based one.
Is there a way
11 matches
Mail list logo
