[rt-users] The fsck.com-rt- URI scheme

2006-06-11 Thread Philip Kime
Will this URI scheme thing be continued in later versions of RT? I remember JV saying that it probably wouldn't. I'm wondering if it's worth bothering with generating patches to get rid of the hard-coded "fsck.com-rt-" scheme because I need to use a lot of REST calls making links etc. and

Re: [rt-users] The fsck.com-rt- URI scheme

2006-06-11 Thread Jesse Vincent
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:56:12PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote: Will this URI scheme thing be continued in later versions of RT? I remember JV saying that it probably wouldn't. When did I say this? ___

RE: [rt-users] The fsck.com-rt- URI scheme

2006-06-11 Thread Philip Kime
You may well not have done ... I just remembered something about wanting to take it away but not wanting to break too much stuff ...? PK -Original Message- From: Jesse Vincent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 June 2006 13:59 To: Philip Kime Cc: RT users Subject: Re: [rt-users] The

Re: [rt-users] The fsck.com-rt- URI scheme

2006-06-11 Thread Todd Chapman
All tickets should have fsck.com-rt schemes. Why would that be a problem? -Todd On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 01:56:12PM -0700, Philip Kime wrote: Will this URI scheme thing be continued in later versions of RT? I remember JV saying that it probably wouldn't. I'm wondering if it's worth bothering