My goal is that all messages sent to RT are also going to a second
mailbox that would be used in case of a disaster on RT.
I've done this by making bac...@company.com an AdminCC of the queue. That gets
comments and replies by default, plus anything else I want to set up a scrip
for.
LEGAL
Fine but this way the backup email (as AdminCC) wouldn't see the people
who receive the email (to and cc fields) Am I wrong?
Jerome
Toby Darling a écrit :
My goal is that all messages sent to RT are also going to a second
mailbox that would be used in case of a disaster on RT.
I've done
Fine but this way the backup email (as AdminCC) wouldn't see the people
who receive the email (to and cc fields) Am I wrong?
Think you're right. I guess you could tweak your admin correspondence template?
LEGAL NOTICE
Unless expressly stated otherwise, information contained in this
message is
Greetings,
I'm trying to determine what the maximum size of attachments that I can use
through RT. We have some users that want to put larger attachments in there.
Can anyone tell me where the attachments are stored in the database, and if you
know, what data type it's been defined as?
I
I have defined $WebExternalAuth (and $WebFallbackToInternalAuth)
in order to use our apache authentication, works fine but how do
I override it to get a login screen so I can login as root?
Ray Horne
Linux Systems Manager
Cambridge University Library
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Ray Horne wrote:
I have defined $WebExternalAuth (and $WebFallbackToInternalAuth)
in order to use our apache authentication, works fine but how do
I override it to get a login screen so I can login as root?
I'm just looking at this here, following on from the ExternalAuth
I am trying to understand a bit more how RT works, so I do apologize in
advance for the trivial questions:
1) When someone sends a support email to RT, it first sees if the users
exists on the databases it uses to do user authentication. The local
database is checked last even if it
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, jan.gr...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
I'm using (aspiring to use) apache's mod_auth_cas to do external
authentication, plus RT::Authen::ExternalAuth as an info provider to
provide information about the apache-supplied username.
Is this actually *possible*? RT 3.8.4.
http://wiki.bestpractical.com/view/NoRecipFound
It looks like it is replying correctly - make sure the box can send to your
user - no mail relay set up maybe?
And, the no recipients found is probably because you don't have any explicit
watchers set up for the queue...
-Original
I was able to successfully able to run the following command make
initialize-database and follow throught the entire settings.
When I?enter my url helpdesk.example.com/rt, I got the following page? cannot
be found error message http 404. Nonetheless, when i enter my regular url
without /rt, i
Hi All,
Is there a way to configure a group such that all members of the group
can see any tickets for which any member of the group is the Requestor?
I can't quite see to reason this one out.
Thanks,
--
Andy Speagle
THE Student - UCATS
Wichita State University
signature.asc
Description:
Please read the list archives, this has just come up within the last
few days, and requires some customization.
--
Cambridge Energy Alliance: Save money. Save the planet.
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community
Hello,
We are trying to construct saved searches at my workplace that
delineate what needs attention and what does not more clearly than
just the ticket status (new, open, etc.) So, I am trying to create a
search of tickets that require attention, which will include all new
tickets as
Today I have an additional need, a need for heavily checked web
forms with workflow, with absolutely minimal effort required
to create a (simple) form and associated workflow. It's easy
to imagine a web interface with drop-down boxes (filled from
LDAP) that creates a ticket, but I'm looking
Is this kind of search possible?
Not natively.
Or do I simply have to make a large
search with a section of LastUpdatedBy != 'user1' OR LastUpdatedBy !
= 'user2' OR ... for 30 or so users?
Correct. But you could create a callback that expands 'LastUpdatedGroup'
into the alternated series of
15 matches
Mail list logo