Hi everyone,
Thanks for all the replies!
I'll have a look at the perl stuff and see if something can receive an
update, but removing the HTML::Quoted packet doesn't seem right when
functionality is lost. Also, debuggin in production is rather hard since
the problem is pretty hard to predict (as
Hi Guys,
Installed the latest production build of RT last week. Absolutely loving it
and it has increased productivity massively. In the queue settings, we use
the description field to describe the list in about a paragraph so that we
can list all queues and their use on our intranet. It appears
Hi All,
Can anyone offer any insight into how to deal with multiple RT
instances, such that bounce messages get picked up by the correct RT
instance?
Currently I have 2 RT instances, but bounces from either instance are
almost always sent back to the user of the apache process
Hi Kenn,
I have looked on the wiki and can only find a patch (ResolveSendsReply)
Is this what you are referring to? If it's not, I would appreciate your
offer to send me your template.
Regards, Jim
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
We want to install 4.0.5 alongside our working 3.8.11
setup, and keep 3.8.11 working while some folks check
out 4.0.5.
Does anyone know if the deps for 4.0.5 will screw up
a running 3.8.10 instance?
RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
* Boston March 5
Hi Kenn,
My better half always tells me to never assume, it makes an ass of you
and me J. But in this case you are right on the money. That is exactly
what I was looking for.
Many thanks, Jim
From: Kenneth Crocker [mailto:kenn.croc...@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 February 2012 19:15
To: Jim
On 2/20/2012 11:18 AM, Jeff Blaine wrote:
We want to install 4.0.5 alongside our working 3.8.11
setup, and keep 3.8.11 working while some folks check
out 4.0.5.
Does anyone know if the deps for 4.0.5 will screw up
a running 3.8.10 instance?
I always build a dedicated Perl for each instance
