__
From: Drew Barnes
Sent: 7 августа 2007 г., 21:08
To: Boris Lytochkin
Subject: [rt-users] Attachments table of RT's Mysql database
I guess it all comes down to different strokes for different folks.
Perhaps this could be put up on the wiki
On Aug 8, 2007, at 5:17 AM, Boris Lytochkin wrote:
Wiki would be enough, but there is a problem in current patch state:
it uses special constant string inplace of real content to indicate
that file is located out of DB.
Right way is to use flag in table. I do not think that changing scheme
Wednesday, August 8, 2007, 6:22:31 PM, you wrote:
This might be a good place to use the ContentEncoding field to
describe an 'ondisk' encoding.
How do you expect to use this filed?
Something like '(ondisk|inDB),(base64|quoted-printable|...)'?
On Aug 8, 2007, at 5:17 AM, Boris Lytochkin
Lytochkin
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 9:48 AM
To: Jesse Vincent
Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re[4]: [rt-users] Attachments table of RT's Mysql database
Wednesday, August 8, 2007, 6:22:31 PM, you wrote:
This might be a good place to use the ContentEncoding field to
describe
On Aug 8, 2007, at 10:47 AM, Boris Lytochkin wrote:
Wednesday, August 8, 2007, 6:22:31 PM, you wrote:
This might be a good place to use the ContentEncoding field to
describe an 'ondisk' encoding.
How do you expect to use this filed?
Something like
Wednesday, August 8, 2007, 7:45:08 PM, you wrote:
I think I was envisioning ondisk as a new encoding meaning the
content is the path to the attachment's content on disk (presumably
named as a sha1 sum of its content) and not a prefox to the existing
encodings. There's not much sense in
within RT.
Best,
Jesse
--
Boris Lytochkin,
JSC e-port, Moscow
web: www.e-port.ru, wap: wap.e-port.ru
tel: +7 (495) 777 1872, ext. 251
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:31:31 -0500
From: Gregory Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Attachments table of RT's Mysql database
-0500
From: Gregory Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Attachments table of RT's Mysql database
To: Justin Brodley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Justin Brodley
. 251
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 12:31:31 -0500
From: Gregory Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Attachments table of RT's Mysql database
To: Justin Brodley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text
, 2007 6:31 AM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re[2]: [rt-users] Attachments table of RT's Mysql database
Ken,
First, if everything is inside a database, then a
simple backup of the database will get everything related to a
particular RT instance.
Wrong. We _stopped_ backup process
@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re[2]: [rt-users] Attachments table of RT's Mysql database
Ken,
First, if everything is inside a database, then a
simple backup of the database will get everything related to a
particular RT instance.
Wrong. We _stopped_ backup process of RT database due to LARGE
Aug 2007 12:31:31 -0500
From: Gregory Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Attachments table of RT's Mysql database
To: Justin Brodley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hello everybody.
We've been using RT for more than three months as part of our
customer concern processes. Overall, things have been going well.
The configuration includes Mysql, Apache2 and Postfix running on Ubuntu
6.06. I've made no modifications to the databases.
The primary concern at
Subject: [rt-users] Attachments table of RT's Mysql database
Hello everybody.
We've been using RT for more than three months as part of our
customer concern processes. Overall, things have been going well.
The configuration includes Mysql, Apache2 and Postfix running on Ubuntu
6.06. I've made
14 matches
Mail list logo
