[rt-users] RTFM puzzling readme

2010-12-09 Thread Giuseppe Sollazzo
Hi all, this will sound trivial but... RTFM's readme (v 2.4.2) contains the following sentence: Install RT 3.4.2 or newer (Do not use this with 3.8.0 as there are incompatibilities) Being strictly literal, should I interpret it as 3.8.x is fine except when x=0? However, the wiki says: It

Re: [rt-users] RTFM puzzling readme

2010-12-09 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 11:38:49AM +, Giuseppe Sollazzo wrote: RTFM's readme (v 2.4.2) contains the following sentence: Install RT 3.4.2 or newer (Do not use this with 3.8.0 as there are incompatibilities) Being strictly literal, should I interpret it as 3.8.x is fine except when x=0?

Re: [rt-users] RTFM puzzling readme

2010-12-09 Thread Giuseppe Sollazzo
On 09/12/10 13:50, Kevin Falcone wrote: RT 3.8.8, you should really try RTFM2.4.3rc1 since it fixes one or two incompatibilities you may run into. Hi Kevin, sorry - I meant the blog, not the wiki. It's here: http://blog.bestpractical.com/2009/06/rtfm-242-now-available.html As far as

Re: [rt-users] RTFM puzzling readme

2010-12-09 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 02:01:24PM +, Giuseppe Sollazzo wrote: On 09/12/10 13:50, Kevin Falcone wrote: RT 3.8.8, you should really try RTFM2.4.3rc1 since it fixes one or two incompatibilities you may run into. Hi Kevin, sorry - I meant the blog, not the wiki. It's here: