We had the same problem (FreeBSD 8.1, rt-3.8.10,
p5-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth-0.09, apache-2.2.19, ap22-mod_fastcgi-2.4.6_1).
Replacing mod_fastcgi with mod_perl (ap22-mod_perl2-2.0.5,3), solved the
problem.
Regards
--
Vladimir Nikolic | Sistemski administrator / System Administrator
Amis |
We were able to fix the issue (at least we believe it, more testing is
necessary) by starting standalone FastCGI RT server. Further analysis
of the issue is required, but as there are so many factors to consider
(Perl build, FastCGI, RH EL6, ...), it will take a while.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 17:09, Thomas Sibley t...@bestpractical.com wrote:
1) Can you send your entire Apache config (not just the RT vhost part)?
Private mail to me is fine if you don't want to share it with the list.
Is attached
Regards
apache-conf.tgz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
On 04 Mar 2011 10:06, Michael Polivanov wrote:
We have now tested it without proxy: same result, same problem. Can
this be a FastCGI issue?
1) Can you send your entire Apache config (not just the RT vhost part)?
Private mail to me is fine if you don't want to share it with the list.
2) Start
We have discovered a very unpleasant behavior of RT if used with
RT::Authen::External module with LDAP authentication enabled. The
problem is that sometimes a RT site visitor (no credentials entered,
no cookie set) gets automatically logged in with a session of another
user, that was active before
On 03 Mar 2011 13:03, Michael Polivanov wrote:
We have discovered a very unpleasant behavior of RT if used with
RT::Authen::External module with LDAP authentication enabled. The
problem is that sometimes a RT site visitor (no credentials entered,
no cookie set) gets automatically logged in
Please keep mail on the list, thanks.
On 03 Mar 2011 13:47, Michael Polivanov wrote:
Yes, there is one. I thought already that this might be a reason, but
the setup is SSL only, so i don't think the proxy thing will be able
to cache anything.
You should test your scenario without any proxies
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 20:10, Thomas Sibley t...@bestpractical.com wrote:
Please keep mail on the list, thanks.
Ups, too fast reply. My bloody mistake ...
You should test your scenario without any proxies involved. If you can
still replicate it, then we can keep troubleshooting. Otherwise,
On 03 Mar 2011 14:26, Michael Polivanov wrote:
Will do so. But i am still unsure how a proxy server can interfere a
SSL connection in my case. I mean if the files would be cached by the
proxy, i wouldn't see the requests in apache log, especially not for
NoAuth objects, but i saw the every
