Stuart Browne stuart.bro...@ausregistry.com.au writes:
In short: XFS is fast and not reliable.
I think you exaggerate a bit. We have hundreds of terabytes of storage
on XFS. We see very few reliability problems.
--
Leif Nixon -Systems expert
Hi all.
I'm going to migrate our rt installation to latest version. We'll install clean
RT on new hardware and them migrate DB and custom modifications.
Some points about our rt installation:
- db size - more than 30G;
- mostly 10 tickets;
- 4000 transactions per day.
Can you please advice
Thu 02 Apr 2009 09:57:57 AM GMT
Agnislav Onufrijchuk wrote:
Hi all.
I'm going to migrate our rt installation to latest version. We'll install
clean
RT on new hardware and them migrate DB and custom modifications.
Some points about our rt installation:
- db size - more than 30G;
-
Hi,
I have included my comments below. It is important to consider
your skills/strengths when making these choices. i.e. If you
have experience with one database or OS, you should consider
using them instead of trying to build expertise in a new
environment. That being said...
On Thu, Apr 02,
Mike Peachey wrote:
Slackware Linux. Perfect balance of security and stability and with a
custom-generic kernel the RAM footprint is comparatively tiny and makes
for a very responsive server.
I have no enough experience with Slackware. AFAIK, it's simple as BSD. Is it
true?
Whatever OS
Thu 02 Apr 2009 14:51:06 GMT
Agnislav Onufrijchuk wrote:
Mike Peachey wrote:
Slackware Linux. Perfect balance of security and stability and with a
custom-generic kernel the RAM footprint is comparatively tiny and makes
for a very responsive server.
I have no enough experience with Slackware.
Kenneth Marshall wrote:
Are these 4000 tickets per day or 4000 updates total? 10 tickets
is not very many if you actually generate 4000 tickets per day. Do
you shred old tickets to remove them from your DB?
4000 Transactions, not tickets per day.
- File system: Ext3/XFS/JFS/...?
Use
Are these 4000 tickets per day or 4000 updates total? 10 tickets
is not very many if you actually generate 4000 tickets per day. Do
you shred old tickets to remove them from your DB?
One more thing: we have 4000 transactions, but we have a number of long SELECT
queries every day. No, we
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 04:58:34PM +0300, Agnislav Onufrijchuk wrote:
Kenneth Marshall wrote:
Are these 4000 tickets per day or 4000 updates total? 10 tickets
is not very many if you actually generate 4000 tickets per day. Do
you shred old tickets to remove them from your DB?
4000
- apache 2.2 or nginx?
Apache. No Question.
Why? nginx supports FastCGI too and it is recommended to use on dedicated
projects.
Let me put it this way.. when you run into trouble, you want to be on
the same server that 99.9% of RT users are running.
Agree :)
Thanks for help!
--
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 05:03:30PM +0300, Agnislav Onufrijchuk wrote:
Are these 4000 tickets per day or 4000 updates total? 10 tickets
is not very many if you actually generate 4000 tickets per day. Do
you shred old tickets to remove them from your DB?
One more thing: we have 4000
I have no enough experience with Slackware. AFAIK, it's simple as BSD. Is it
true?
I second the Slackware vote. I use it for everything. It's the ultimate
distro for reliability-through-simplicity. Install nothing you don't need.
If you don't need xxgdb on your production server, don't
April 2009 07:17
To: Agnislav Onufrijchuk
Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] What software is recommended for high-loaded
RT3.8-latest?
I have no enough experience with Slackware. AFAIK, it's simple as BSD. Is it
true?
I second the Slackware vote. I use
13 matches
Mail list logo
