Wiki would be enough, but there is a problem in current patch state:
it uses special constant string inplace of real content to indicate
that file is located out of DB.
Right way is to use flag in table. I do not think that changing scheme
witch patching is a good idea, that is why this patch
On Aug 8, 2007, at 5:17 AM, Boris Lytochkin wrote:
Wiki would be enough, but there is a problem in current patch state:
it uses special constant string inplace of real content to indicate
that file is located out of DB.
Right way is to use flag in table. I do not think that changing scheme
I wrote a patch that allows to store non-text attachments to be
stored out of DB - in my case it greatly reduced DB swelling.
Just for now it uses constant string in Attachments-Content to
indicate that file is written to FS.
You will need to specify some variables in RT_Siteconfig.pm:
Ken,
First, if everything is inside a database, then a
simple backup of the database will get everything related to a
particular RT instance.
Wrong. We _stopped_ backup process of RT database due to LARGE amount
data every day. We have no such amount of tape to store DB's everyday
backups.
, 2007 6:31 AM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re[2]: [rt-users] Attachments table of RT's Mysql database
Ken,
First, if everything is inside a database, then a
simple backup of the database will get everything related to a
particular RT instance.
Wrong. We _stopped_ backup process
