FTS is enabled and working, but it seems to be working only on tickets that
were set up when the setup tool was run. According to the docs
(rt4/docs/full_text_indexing.pod):
To keep the index up-to-date, you will need to run:
/opt/rt4/sbin/rt-fulltext-indexer
...at regular intervals. By
On Dec 9, 2016, at 2:06 PM, Alex Hall
> wrote:
I thought the tool I had to run periodically was
/opt/rt4/sbin/rt-fulltext-indexer. That's the one guides tell me to run; the
setup tool seems to be the initial database adjustment tool, but once it
I thought the tool I had to run periodically was
/opt/rt4/sbin/rt-fulltext-indexer. That's the one guides tell me to run;
the setup tool seems to be the initial database adjustment tool, but once
it runs once, I thought I had to run the indexer every so often. The
indexer is the tool that refuses
On Dec 9, 2016, at 1:33 PM, Alex Hall
> wrote:
I still don't have this working, so any input would be great. I just wanted to
add that, since my last email on the topic, I've tried putting an rtrc file in
/root, since I'm running this as root for
I still don't have this working, so any input would be great. I just wanted
to add that, since my last email on the topic, I've tried putting an rtrc
file in /root, since I'm running this as root for the moment. It didn't
help. I've also looked through the actual file, trying to find where it
gets
pls ignore. those CF's are not the ones needing updating. something else
is up
On 09/12/16 20:49, Woody - Wild Thing Safaris wrote:
HI All,
I'm trying to set a custom field on create using the headers
X-RT-Command: CF.{PNR}: 12345678
X-RT-Command: CF.{Surname}: Bloggs
logs show:
[7552]
HI All,
I'm trying to set a custom field on create using the headers
X-RT-Command: CF.{PNR}: 12345678
X-RT-Command: CF.{Surname}: Bloggs
logs show:
[7552] [Fri Dec 9 17:35:30 2016] [debug]: Got command customfield{pnr}
=> 12345678
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Barton Chittenden
wrote:
> We use a CF called 'Community Bug' to track bugzilla bug numbers associated
> with customer tickets. It would be really useful to know which values of
> CF.{Community Bug} occur most often.
>
> If you'll
We use a CF called 'Community Bug' to track bugzilla bug numbers associated
with customer tickets. It would be really useful to know which values of
CF.{Community Bug} occur most often.
If you'll pardon a mix of SQL and query builder syntax, I'm looking to do
something like this:
SELECT
Le 09/12/2016 à 17:08, Alex Hall a écrit :
> Thanks. By "lib", I assume you just mean to make a folder somewhere,
> then use "@import myNewLib/myFile.css"? Should I make a replacement
> for the css file in local/html/NoAut/something that I'm replacing? I
> actually don't see a static folder around
Hey Alex,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Alex Hall wrote:
> Thanks. By "lib", I assume you just mean to make a folder somewhere, then
> use "@import myNewLib/myFile.css"? Should I make a replacement for the css
> file in local/html/NoAut/something that I'm replacing? I
Thanks. By "lib", I assume you just mean to make a folder somewhere, then
use "@import myNewLib/myFile.css"? Should I make a replacement for the css
file in local/html/NoAut/something that I'm replacing? I actually don't see
a static folder around this CSS folder, so I'm not quite sure what should
Hi Alex,
No need for a callback. Just include your CSS files in a lib. There is a
function call you can make to include a CSS file in /static/css/. This is
the proper way in, at least, 4.2.
-m
On Dec 9, 2016 9:55 AM, "Alex Hall" wrote:
> Hey all,
> I'm trying to add a
Hey all,
I'm trying to add a background image to a div, so went looking for the
callback the wiki describes. The wiki uses 3.8, and I'm on 4.4.1, but I
didn't think that mattered. Yet, I can't find any callbacks by looking in
main.css or base.css, and the wiki's big list of 4.2 callbacks has no
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Thomas Oddsund
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some saved searches on my dashboard. Three of them are based on a
> Custom Field; one show tickets where the CF is set to X, one where CF is set
> to Y, and one is supposed to show
Hi,
Sorry, i used the shredder to remove all user from RT user's DB an now it's
work fine.
Thank you everyone for your help.
Regards,
2016-12-09 14:56 GMT+01:00 Martin Wheldon <
martin.whel...@greenhills-it.co.uk>:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, please disregard my last response, the user account has been
Hi,
Sorry, please disregard my last response, the user account has been
found.
Could you post the RT logs please?
Best Regards
Martin
On 2016-12-09 13:44, Martin Wheldon wrote:
Hi,
Looks like a ldap acl issue, is your ldap search user able to access
the users mail attribute?
Best Regards
Hi,
Looks like a ldap acl issue, is your ldap search user able to access the
users mail attribute?
Best Regards
Martin
On 2016-12-09 13:37, Claude EDUMA wrote:
LDAP logs show that user is retreive, but not bind.
-
SRCH base="o=corp.mycorp.com [2]" scope=2
LDAP logs show that user is retreive, but not bind.
-
SRCH base="o=corp.mycorp.com" scope=2
filter="(&(objectClass=privperson)(mail=claude.ed...@ext.mycorp.com))"
attrs="cn mail mail"
[09/Dec/2016:14:16:47 +0100] conn=9480527 op=2 msgId=3 - RESULT err=0
tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0
Hi,
You could either use another unique attribute i.e mail or add another
uid to each RT user prefixed by a letter.
dn: uid=123456,dc=my,dc=domain
uid: 123456
uid: x123456
Best Regards
Martin
On 2016-12-09 12:49, Joop wrote:
On 9-12-2016 13:38, Claude EDUMA wrote:
Hi Joop,
Thank you
On 9-12-2016 13:38, Claude EDUMA wrote:
> Hi Joop,
>
>
> Thank you for your quick answer.
> We have tested with non numerical username and result is OK.
> Well in my organisation we use ldap uid for username. Any suggestion
> to resolve this issue ?
>
Please keep the list in the loop.
I think the
Hello,
I have some saved searches on my dashboard. Three of them are based on a Custom
Field; one show tickets where the CF is set to X, one where CF is set to Y, and
one is supposed to show tickets tagged with something other then X or Y.
To make the third search, I created the following
On 9-12-2016 11:11, Claude EDUMA wrote:
> Hi everyone.
> First sorry for my english i'm french.
>
> I try a couple of week to have LDAP authentication with my fresh RT
> 4.4.1 installation.
> All seem good but login still fail.
>
> --
> First login :
> -
> [13619] [Wed Dec 7 16:42:02
Hi everyone.
First sorry for my english i'm french.
I try a couple of week to have LDAP authentication with my fresh RT 4.4.1
installation.
All seem good but login still fail.
As you ca see in logs, if it's first time that user try to login, he is
create in RT but and all cheks seem to be OK but
24 matches
Mail list logo