Does the FromSQL method allow for the less-than-/greater-than-or-equal-to
operators? <=, >=
Using them would simplify a query I have.
Thanks
Mathew
--
Keep up with me and what I'm up to: http://theillien.blogspot.com
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com
It's the actual scrip which runs ExtractCustomFieldValues.pm.
Condition: On Create
Action: Extract Custom Field Values
Template: Global template: ExtractEnvironment
Stage: TransactionCreate
Custom condition:
Custom action Preparation code: return 1;
Custom action cleanup code:
Template ExtractEnv
#x27;re on 3.6.3 and that "Everybody" doesn't
> have the "OwnTickets" right? I've just reread this section of code
> and I don't see hwo this can be happening.
>
> -- next part --
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Na
For a pair of high-volume clients, I've set up RT3.6 behind a
lightweight Apache SSL server that uses an Apache rewrite map to balance
the connections- one has 2 servers, one has 4. Works perfectly.
Note: Both of these are using external authentication. I have no idea
about intra-RT auth mechanis
Mathew, what is scrip 18 doing?
At 12:37 PM 6/19/2007, Mathew Snyder wrote:
So far it hasn't posed a problem as it appears to be working but I was looking
at the Apache error_log today and saw this:
[Tue Jun 19 18:02:26 2007] [error]: Scrip Commit 18 died. - Can't call method
"Content" on an und
So far it hasn't posed a problem as it appears to be working but I was looking
at the Apache error_log today and saw this:
[Tue Jun 19 18:02:26 2007] [error]: Scrip Commit 18 died. - Can't call method
"Content" on an undefined value at
/usr/local/rt-3.6.1//lib/RT/Action/ExtractCustomFieldValues.pm
Hi folks,
I'm trying to debug an LDAP overlay, but I can't seem to get the logging
done properly. Here is the relevant stanza from RT_SiteConfig.pm:
Set($LogToSyslog, 'debug');
Set($LogToScreen, 'debug');
Set($LogToFile , 'debug');
Set($LogDir, '/var/log/rt3');
Set($LogToFileNamed
That would be great especially when dealing with reporting applications, having
a value there makes them more complex, as I have to set "not equals"
statements.
Justin Brodley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruslan Zakirov
Sent: Tues
Yes, 1/1/1970 is equal to 'Not set', but I think you have to expect
this to be changed to real NULL as I have very strong wish to change
it as NULLs are clearer, easier for development and more flexible.
Hope we'll have time to do it before 3.8.0
On 6/19/07, Stephen Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On Jun 18, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Michael Kukla wrote:
Jesse et al,
Sorry to say, I again need write the list about something we
noticed last week--namely, that the names of **disabled** users
continue to appear in the Owner drop down one gets when
"Commenting" on ticket.
It appeared that
Has anyone attempted to terminate SSL on a load balancer in front of the
RT server? We did some initial tests but had issues with redirects,
etc. We'd prefer not to terminate SSL directly to the web server as this
adds additional stress to the server.
Justin Brodley
_
FWIW, a brief snoop didn't turn up any null date fields in our MySQL RT
database.
Gene
At 08:31 AM 6/19/2007, Stephen Turner wrote:
At Tuesday 6/19/2007 11:26 AM, Justin Brodley wrote:
I'm working on some reports for our RT database, and I'm noticing that
fields get populated with 1/1/1970 if
It's nice to see that its consistently inconsistent. We are also running
Oracle, so I'll have to look out for this.
Justin Brodley
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 8:31 AM
To: Justin Brodley; rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
At Tuesday 6/19/2007 11:26 AM, Justin Brodley wrote:
I'm working on some reports for our RT database, and I'm noticing
that fields get populated with 1/1/1970 if there is nothing entered
into the DB.
Is this accurate assessment? If so can I just assume that 1/1/1970 = null?
Yes, that's rig
I'm working on some reports for our RT database, and I'm noticing that
fields get populated with 1/1/1970 if there is nothing entered into the
DB.
Is this accurate assessment? If so can I just assume that 1/1/1970 =
null?
Thanks in advance.
Justin Brodley
_
On Jun 7, 2007, at 3:02 PM, Jeff Platter wrote:
So I finally think I fixed the issue. If anyone is interested it
seemed that in the ArticleCollection_Overlay.pm file there was a
select statement that had 2 things wrong with it. It was generating
the JOIN with OR’s instead of AND’s and it w
Thanks, Jesse, we will test it!
Ulrike
Jesse Vincent wrote:
On Jun 19, 2007, at 5:06 AM, Ulrike Lindemann wrote:
Hi Joop!
Sorry, I can't find RC6, is it available, yet? I would like to test, too!
You can snag a copy at:
http://download.bestpractical.com/pub/rt/devel/RTIR_M3/RTFM-2.2.0RC6.t
Could someone either explain or point me in the right direction about
the Include Page field when creating a custom field in version 3.6.3? I
can't seem to find any documentation on it. Thanks in advance.
--Matt
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/c
On Jun 19, 2007, at 5:06 AM, Ulrike Lindemann wrote:
Hi Joop!
Sorry, I can't find RC6, is it available, yet? I would like to
test, too!
You can snag a copy at:
http://download.bestpractical.com/pub/rt/devel/RTIR_M3/
RTFM-2.2.0RC6.tar.gz
Regards, Ulrike
PGP.sig
Description: This is a
Ulrike Lindemann wrote:
Hi Joop!
Sorry, I can't find RC6, is it available, yet? I would like to test, too!
Regards, Ulrike
Joop wrote:
Jeff Platter wrote:
I’m using RTFM 2.2.0RC5 with RT 3.6.3. I have created a custom field
for the body of the article. I have setup all permissions on the
cust
Hi Joop!
Sorry, I can't find RC6, is it available, yet? I would like to test, too!
Regards, Ulrike
Joop wrote:
Jeff Platter wrote:
I’m using RTFM 2.2.0RC5 with RT 3.6.3. I have created a custom field
for the body of the article. I have setup all permissions on the
custom field and added it to
Hi Buddika,
Did you restart Apache? Changes take effect after.
Christian
buddika weeerasinghe schrieb am 19.06.2007 05:51:
> Hi christian,
>
> I did it.But the result is the same.
>
> rgds,
> Buddika.
>
> Christian Felber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just change $rtname
22 matches
Mail list logo
