Re: [rt-users] Can't resolve in-progress ticket?

2014-09-03 Thread Rezty Felty
'  = {
label  = 'Open It', # loc
update = 'Respond',
},
'pending - resolved'  = {
label  = 'Resolve', # loc
update = 'Comment',
},
'pending - rejected'  = {
label  = 'Reject', # loc
update = 'Respond',
},
'pending - deleted'   = {
label  = 'Delete', # loc
},
'pending - pend-close'   = {
label  = 'Pend-close', # loc
},
'pending - inprogress'   = {
label  = 'Inprogress', # loc
},
'inprogress - open'  = {
label  = 'Open It', # loc
update = 'Respond',
},
'inprogress - resolved'  = {
label  = 'Resolve', # loc
update = 'Comment',
},
'inprogress - rejected'  = {
label  = 'Reject', # loc
update = 'Respond',
},
   'inprogress - deleted'   = {
label  = 'Delete', # loc
},
'inprogress - pend-close'   = {
label  = 'Pend-close', # loc
},
'inprogress - pending'   = {
label  = 'Pending', # loc
},
],
},
# don't change lifecyle of the approvals, they are not capable to deal with
# custom statuses
approvals = {
initial = [ 'new' ],
active  = [ 'open', 'stalled' ],
inactive= [ 'resolved', 'rejected', 'deleted' ],

defaults = {
on_create = 'new',
on_merge = 'resolved',
reminder_on_open = 'open',
reminder_on_resolve  = 'resolved',
},

transitions = {
''   = [qw(new open resolved)],

# from   = [ to list ],
new  = [qw(open stalled resolved rejected deleted)],
open = [qw(new stalled resolved rejected deleted)],
stalled  = [qw(new open rejected resolved deleted)],
resolved = [qw(new open stalled rejected deleted)],
rejected = [qw(new open stalled resolved deleted)],
deleted  = [qw(new open stalled rejected resolved)],
},
rights = {
'* - deleted'  = 'DeleteTicket',
'* - rejected' = 'ModifyTicket',
'* - *'= 'ModifyTicket',
},
actions = [
'new - open'  = {
label  = 'Open It', # loc
update = 'Respond',
},
'new - resolved'  = {
label  = 'Resolve', # loc
update = 'Comment',
},
'new - rejected'  = {
label  = 'Reject', # loc
update = 'Respond',
},
'new - deleted'   = {
label  = 'Delete', # loc
},

'open - stalled'  = {
label  = 'Stall', # loc
update = 'Comment',
},
'open - resolved' = {
label  = 'Resolve', # loc
update = 'Comment',
},
'open - rejected' = {
label  = 'Reject', # loc
update = 'Respond',
},

'stalled - open'  = {
label  = 'Open It', # loc
},
'resolved - open' = {
label  = 'Re-open', # loc
update = 'Comment',
},
'rejected - open' = {
label  = 'Re-open', # loc
update = 'Comment',
},
'deleted - open'  = {
label  = 'Undelete', # loc
},
],
},
);

Thanks,
Rezty Felty
Senior Linux Administrator
Adknowledge
816-559-1196

From: Rezty Felty rfe...@adknowledge.commailto:rfe...@adknowledge.com
Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 at 9:16 AM
To: Alex Peters a...@peters.netmailto:a...@peters.net
Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.commailto:rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com 
rt-users@lists.bestpractical.commailto:rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Can't resolve in-progress ticket?

Yes, we fixed it with lifecycle entries in the RT_SiteConfig.pm, I hadn’t 
realized that lifecycles had replaced status’.

Thanks,
Rezty Felty
Senior Linux Administrator
Adknowledge
816-559-1196

From: Alex Peters a...@peters.netmailto:a...@peters.net
Date: Monday, August 25, 2014 at 5:59 PM
To: Rezty Felty rfe...@adknowledge.commailto:rfe...@adknowledge.com
Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.commailto:rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com 
rt-users@lists.bestpractical.commailto:rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Can't resolve in-progress ticket?


Sounds like a possible misconfiguration of the relevant lifecycle:

https://bestpractical.com/docs/rt/latest/customizing/lifecycles.html#Update-Transitions

On 26

Re: [rt-users] Can't resolve in-progress ticket?

2014-08-26 Thread Rezty Felty
Yes, we fixed it with lifecycle entries in the RT_SiteConfig.pm, I hadn’t 
realized that lifecycles had replaced status’.

Thanks,
Rezty Felty
Senior Linux Administrator
Adknowledge
816-559-1196

From: Alex Peters a...@peters.netmailto:a...@peters.net
Date: Monday, August 25, 2014 at 5:59 PM
To: Rezty Felty rfe...@adknowledge.commailto:rfe...@adknowledge.com
Cc: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.commailto:rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com 
rt-users@lists.bestpractical.commailto:rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Can't resolve in-progress ticket?


Sounds like a possible misconfiguration of the relevant lifecycle:

https://bestpractical.com/docs/rt/latest/customizing/lifecycles.html#Update-Transitions

On 26/08/2014 1:40 am, Rezty Felty 
rfe...@adknowledge.commailto:rfe...@adknowledge.com wrote:
More info, have opened additional tickets to test, seems that when any ticket 
is placed in in-progress status, it then loses all status choices except 
in-progress.

Thanks,
Rezty Felty
Senior Linux Administrator
Adknowledge
816-559-1196

From: Rezty Felty rfe...@adknowledge.commailto:rfe...@adknowledge.com
Date: Monday, August 25, 2014 at 10:30 AM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.commailto:rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com 
rt-users@lists.bestpractical.commailto:rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: [rt-users] Can't resolve in-progress ticket?

I just upgraded our RT system, from running on SLES 11 to RHEL 6.5, RT from 
3.8.7 to 4.2.6, and mysql  from an old version to the latest mariadb.  Upgrade 
went smoothly, have tested everything, all seems to be well, except one thing.  
I have a ticket that a user placed in in-progress status after the upgrade, and 
now the only status anyone can place it in, even me as an RT Admin, is 
in-progress.  Can’t resolve, open, delete, pending, etc.  They aren’t even 
choices in the drop-down in the jumbo ticket display.  Any idea what caused 
this, and how to resolve?

Thanks,
Rezty Felty
Senior Linux Administrator
Adknowledge
816-559-1196

--
RT Training - Boston, September 9-10
http://bestpractical.com/training
-- 
RT Training - Boston, September 9-10
http://bestpractical.com/training

[rt-users] Can't resolve in-progress ticket?

2014-08-25 Thread Rezty Felty
I just upgraded our RT system, from running on SLES 11 to RHEL 6.5, RT from 
3.8.7 to 4.2.6, and mysql  from an old version to the latest mariadb.  Upgrade 
went smoothly, have tested everything, all seems to be well, except one thing.  
I have a ticket that a user placed in in-progress status after the upgrade, and 
now the only status anyone can place it in, even me as an RT Admin, is 
in-progress.  Can’t resolve, open, delete, pending, etc.  They aren’t even 
choices in the drop-down in the jumbo ticket display.  Any idea what caused 
this, and how to resolve?

Thanks,
Rezty Felty
Senior Linux Administrator
Adknowledge
816-559-1196
-- 
RT Training - Boston, September 9-10
http://bestpractical.com/training

Re: [rt-users] Can't resolve in-progress ticket?

2014-08-25 Thread Rezty Felty
More info, have opened additional tickets to test, seems that when any ticket 
is placed in in-progress status, it then loses all status choices except 
in-progress.

Thanks,
Rezty Felty
Senior Linux Administrator
Adknowledge
816-559-1196

From: Rezty Felty rfe...@adknowledge.commailto:rfe...@adknowledge.com
Date: Monday, August 25, 2014 at 10:30 AM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.commailto:rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com 
rt-users@lists.bestpractical.commailto:rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: [rt-users] Can't resolve in-progress ticket?

I just upgraded our RT system, from running on SLES 11 to RHEL 6.5, RT from 
3.8.7 to 4.2.6, and mysql  from an old version to the latest mariadb.  Upgrade 
went smoothly, have tested everything, all seems to be well, except one thing.  
I have a ticket that a user placed in in-progress status after the upgrade, and 
now the only status anyone can place it in, even me as an RT Admin, is 
in-progress.  Can’t resolve, open, delete, pending, etc.  They aren’t even 
choices in the drop-down in the jumbo ticket display.  Any idea what caused 
this, and how to resolve?

Thanks,
Rezty Felty
Senior Linux Administrator
Adknowledge
816-559-1196
-- 
RT Training - Boston, September 9-10
http://bestpractical.com/training

Re: [rt-users] Difficulty implementing LDAP/AD Authorization

2014-07-31 Thread Rezty Felty
Well, we were unable to get the  RT::Authen::ExternalAuth plugin to work, no 
matter what we tried, but I had a co-worker looking over my configs as well, 
and I had previously tried to make AD/LDAP auth work by just using Apache to do 
it . . . When looking in the vhost conf file for rt, he noticed I had placed my 
Apache Location Directive inside my Directory Directive, which is fairly common 
and I would never have thought twice about.  However, in this instance, the 
Directory Directive began as such:

Directory /opt/rt4/share/html

and the Location Directive began as such:

Location /

Since they were two different paths, the Location Directive was never getting 
executed, which was where all the apache ldap auth info was.  By moving the 
Location Directive outside the Directory Directive, and adding an alias:

ScriptAlias / /opt/rt4/sbin/rt-server.fcgi/

we were able to make AD/LDAP authorization work.

Thanks,
Rezty Felty
Senior Linux Administrator
Adknowledge
816-559-1196

From: Alex Peters a...@peters.netmailto:a...@peters.net
Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 at 7:31 PM
To: Rezty Felty rfe...@adknowledge.commailto:rfe...@adknowledge.com
Cc: RT users 
rt-users@lists.bestpractical.commailto:rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Difficulty implementing LDAP/AD Authorization


RT won't look at any changes you place in example RT_SiteConfig.pm files 
included with extensions (if that's why you've included that file in your 
previous e-mail).  You need to copy the relevant changes into your RT 
installation's RT_SiteConfig.pm file.

On 31/07/2014 3:12 am, Rezty Felty 
rfe...@adknowledge.commailto:rfe...@adknowledge.com wrote:
Jxplorer shows successful connection and authentication using the auth info I 
have in rt.  Here is my /opt/rt4/etc/RT_SiteConfig.pm:


# Any configuration directives you include  here will override

# RT's default configuration file, RT_Config.pm

#

# To include a directive here, just copy the equivalent statement

# from RT_Config.pm and change the value. We've included a single

# sample value below.

#

# This file is actually a perl module, so you can include valid

# perl code, as well.

#

# The converse is also true, if this file isn't valid perl, you're

# going to run into trouble. To check your SiteConfig file, use

# this command:

#

#   perl -c /path/to/your/etc/RT_SiteConfig.pm

#

# You must restart your webserver after making changes to this file.


Set( $rtname, 'Adknowledge.com');

Set( $WebDomain, 
'pkc-tracker02.ak-networks.comhttp://pkc-tracker02.ak-networks.com');

Set( $WebPort, 443);

# You must install Plugins on your own, this is only an example

# of the correct syntax to use when activating them.

# Plugin( RT::Extension::QuickDelete );

# Plugin( RT::Extension::CommandByMail );

Set( @Plugins, qw(RT::Authen::ExternalAuth) );

and my /opt/rt4/local/plugins/RT-Authen-ExternalAuth/etc/RT_SiteConfig.pm, 
which I would think more important in this case:


=head1 NAME


External Authentication Configuration - Sample configs for 
LRT::Authen::ExternalAuth


=head1 DESCRIPTION


LRT::Authen::ExternalAuth provides a lot of flexibility

with many configuration options. This file describes these

configuration options and is itself a sample configuration

suitable for dropping into your Cetc/RT_SiteConfig.pm

file and modifying.


=over 4


=item C$ExternalAuthPriority


The order in which the services defined in ExternalSettings

should be used to authenticate users. User is authenticated

if successfully confirmed by any service - no more services

are checked.


You should remove services you don't use. For example,

if you're only using My_LDAP, remove My_MySQL and My_SSO_Cookie.


=cut


Set($ExternalAuthPriority,  [ 'My_LDAP',

  'My_MySQL',

  'My_SSO_Cookie'

]

);


=item C$ExternalInfoPriority


When multiple auth services are available, this value defines

the order in which the services defined in ExternalSettings

should be used to get information about users. This includes

RealName, Tel numbers etc, but also whether or not the user

should be considered disabled.


Once a user record is found, no more services are checked.


You CANNOT use a SSO cookie to retrieve information.


You should remove services you don't use, but you must define

at least one service.


=cut


Set($ExternalInfoPriority,  [ 'My_LDAP',

  'My_MySQL',

]

);


=item C$ExternalServiceUsesSSLorTLS


If this is set to true, then the relevant packages will

be loaded to use SSL/TLS connections. At the moment,

this just means LNet::SSLeay.


=cut


Set($ExternalServiceUsesSSLorTLS,0);


=item C$AutoCreateNonExternalUsers


If this is set to 1, then users should be autocreated by RT

as internal users if they fail to authenticate from an

external service. This is useful if you have users outside

your organization who

[rt-users] Difficulty implementing LDAP/AD Authorization

2014-07-30 Thread Rezty Felty
I have a new install of RT 4.2.4 running on Centos 6.4 64 bit with Apache 
2.2.15.  I have installed RT::Authen::ExternalAuth and Net::LDAP, and have 
configured my 
/opt/rt4/local/plugins/RT-Authen-ExternalAuth/etc/RT_SiteConfig.pm with the 
right server address and LDAP user and password, and added Set( @Plugins, 
qw(RT::Authen::ExternalAuth) ); to the file /opt/rt4/etc/RT_SiteConfig.pm.  I 
have restarted https, restarted the entire server, but i continue to see the 
same results, e.g. I can log in to RT with the default installed root account, 
but when I try any AD user, it fails, and the error I receive in both 
/var/log/messages and /var/log/httpd/error_log is the same:  “FAILED LOGIN for 
user from serveraddress (/opt/rt4/sbin/../lib/RT/Interface/Web.pm:811)

Any suggestions on where to begin troubleshooting this would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Rezty Felty
Senior Linux Administrator
Adknowledge
816-559-1196
-- 
RT Training - Boston, September 9-10
http://bestpractical.com/training

Re: [rt-users] Difficulty implementing LDAP/AD Authorization

2014-07-30 Thread Rezty Felty
 section below. You can remove values you don't

expect to match, but it's recommended to use 'Name' and 'EmailAddress'

at minimum. For example:


'attr_match_list' = [

'Name',

'EmailAddress',

],


You should not use items that can map to multiple users (such as a

RealName or building name).


=item attr_map


Mapping of RT attributes on to attributes in the external source.

Valid keys are attributes of an

LRT::User|http://bestpractical.com/rt/docs/latest/RT/User.html.

The values are attributes from your authentication source.

For example, an LDAP mapping might look like:


'attr_map' = {

'Name' = 'sAMAccountName',

'EmailAddress' = 'mail',

'Organization' = 'physicalDeliveryOfficeName',

'RealName' = 'cn',

...

},


=back


=cut


Set($ExternalSettings, {

# AN EXAMPLE DB SERVICE

'My_MySQL'   =  {

'type'  =  'db',

'server'=  'server.domain.tld',

'database'  =  'DB_NAME',

'table' =  'USERS_TABLE',

'user'  =  'DB_USER',

'pass'  =  'DB_PASS',

'port'  =  'DB_PORT',

'dbi_driver'=  'DBI_DRIVER',

'u_field'   =  'username',

'p_field'   =  'password',

'p_enc_pkg' =  'Crypt::MySQL',

'p_enc_sub' =  'password',

'd_field'   =  'disabled',

'd_values'  =  ['0'],

'attr_match_list' =  [

'Gecos',

'Name',

],

'attr_map' = {

'Name'   = 'username',

'EmailAddress'   = 'email',

'ExternalAuthId' = 'username',

'Gecos'  = 'userID',

},

},

# AN EXAMPLE LDAP SERVICE

'My_LDAP'   =  {

'type'  =  'ldap',

'server'=  '10.201.0.200',

'user'  =  'apachel...@adknowledge.com',

'pass'  =  ‘redacted',

'base'  =  'dc=adknowledge,dc=com',

'filter'=  '(FILTER_STRING)',

'd_filter'  =  '(FILTER_STRING)',

'group' =  'GROUP_NAME',

'group_attr'=  'GROUP_ATTR',

'tls'   =  0,

'ssl_version'   =  3,

'net_ldap_args' = [version =  3   ],

'group_scope'   =  'base',

'group_attr_value'  =  'GROUP_ATTR_VALUE',

'attr_match_list' = [

'Name',

'EmailAddress',

'RealName',

],

'attr_map' = {

'Name' = 'sAMAccountName',

'EmailAddress' = 'mail',

'Organization' = 'physicalDeliveryOfficeName',

'RealName' = 'cn',

'ExternalAuthId' = 'sAMAccountName',

'Gecos' = 'sAMAccountName',

'WorkPhone' = 'telephoneNumber',

'Address1' = 'streetAddress',

'City' = 'l',

'State' = 'st',

'Zip' = 'postalCode',

'Country' = 'co'

},

},

# An example SSO cookie service

'My_SSO_Cookie'  = {

'type'  =  'cookie',

'name'  =  'loginCookieValue',

'u_table'   =  'users',

'u_field'   =  'username',

'u_match_key'   =  'userID',

'c_table'   =  'login_cookie',

'c_field'   =  'loginCookieValue',

'c_match_key'   =  'loginCookieUserID',

'db_service_name'   =  'My_MySQL'

},

} );


1;

Thanks,
Rezty Felty
Senior Linux Administrator
Adknowledge
816-559-1196

From: Marco Agostini comunelev...@gmail.commailto:comunelev...@gmail.com
Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2014 at 11:38 AM
To: Rezty Felty rfe...@adknowledge.commailto:rfe...@adknowledge.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Difficulty implementing LDAP/AD Authorization


Il 30/lug/2014 17:34 Rezty Felty 
rfe...@adknowledge.commailto:rfe...@adknowledge.com ha scritto:

 I have a new install of RT 4.2.4 running on Centos 6.4 64 bit with Apache 
 2.2.15.  I have installed RT::Authen::ExternalAuth and Net::LDAP, and have 
 configured my 
 /opt/rt4/local/plugins/RT-Authen-ExternalAuth/etc/RT_SiteConfig.pm with the 
 right server address and LDAP user and password, and added Set( @Plugins, 
 qw(RT::Authen::ExternalAuth) ); to the file /opt/rt4/etc/RT_SiteConfig.pm.  I 
 have restarted https, restarted the entire server, but i continue to see the 
 same results, e.g. I can log in to RT with the default installed root 
 account, but when I try any AD user

[rt-users] AUTO: Rezty Felty has left the building (returning 10/31/2011)

2011-09-22 Thread Rezty Felty

I am out of the office until 10/31/2011.

I am moving on to a new opportunity, and 9/23 will be my last day at
Hallmark.  Please address all issues and inquiries to the backend team at
hm-back...@hmkb2c.com.I will be available at 816.559.1196 for emergencies.

Best Wishes,
Rezty Felty


Note: This is an automated response to your message  Re: [rt-users]
AutoCreate with Group Membership. sent on 9/22/2011 4:00:08 PM.

This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
This message, including any attachments, is for the designated recipient
only and/or Hallmark Cards, Inc. employees.  It may contain privileged,
proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have received it in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any
other use of the e-mail, disclosure of the information, or distribution by
you is prohibited.


RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA  September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA  October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA  October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia  November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain  November 28  29, 2011


Re: [rt-users] Where is my error?

2011-08-25 Thread Rezty Felty
OK, I was able to get my new RT system to quit timing out on create ticket 
 by re-indexing the DB.  I still am struggling with the RTFM problem, i 
have checked and the Article Text custom field exists in FM_CustomField, 
in RT the right to view article text is enabled for everyone, yet when you 
click on an article, it still is not showing article text.  Any ideas, 
anyone?

Rezty Felty
Hallmark Digital - Infrastructure
816.559.1196


MSN rustyfe...@hotmail.com
YIM HiRez_L
AIM HiRezL
ICQ 1932818
Skype Rezty.Felty
Googletalk re...@kc-felty.net 



From:
Rezty Felty rfel...@hallmark.com
To:
rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Date:
08/17/2011 13:34
Subject:
[rt-users] Where is my error?
Sent by:
rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com



I have a production RT 3.8.0 instance running on a local Solaris server. I 
have been tasked with migrating it to a remote vmware RHEL Linux instance 
and upgrading to RT 3.8.8 at the same time.  So I installed RT3.8.8 on the 
new server, and then did a MySQL dump of the db from the existing server, 
and moved it over and imported it to the new server, for my test instance 
for the migration.  At first, RTFM did not work, (it would show RTFM, and 
article titles, but if you clicked on one, no article body), there were 
permission errors, I had a few problems.  I engaged RT support for 4 hours 
of paid support, and we worked through all of those issues, and i 
documented all the steps we took.  Then RT on the new server was working 
right and we scheduled a Saturday midnight cutover , the plan was to take 
another dump after shutting down the existing prod RT instance, copy it 
over, do the DB transforms for the upgrade, and all should be well.  I did 
that, and RTFM would not show article bodies again, screens timed out 
opening new tickets, the server could not find cgi-bin, even though it was 
exactly in the location the error logs said it was looking.  Here are the 
commands I ran, see if you can spot a step I missed, because I have to 
reschedule this and try again: 

  752  mv /data01/home/rfelty2/rt3_backup-20110813.sql.gz /data02/rt3/ 
  753  cd /data02/rt3/ 
  754  gunzip rt3_backup-20110813.sql.gz 
  755  mysql -h localhost -u root -p*PW-Redacted* rt3  
rt3_backup-20110813.sql 
  757  vi /etc/my.cnf 
  758  service mysqld restart 
  759  mysql -h localhost -u root -p*PW-Redacted* rt3  
rt3_backup-20110813.sql 
  760  cd /data02/rt3 
  761  mysql -h localhost -u root -p*PW-Redacted* rt3  
rt3_backup-20110813.sql 
  762  /data02/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --dba root 
--prompt-for-dba-password --action upgrade 
  763  /data02/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --dba root -p*PW-Redacted* 
--action upgrade 
  764  /data02/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action schema --datadir etc 
--dba admin --prompt-for-dba-password 
  765  /data02/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action schema --datadir etc 
--dba root --prompt-for-dba-password 
  766  /data02/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action acl --datadir 
etc/upgrade/2.1.0 --dba root --prompt-for-dba-password 
  767  /data02/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action insert --datadir 
etc/upgrade/2.1.0 --dba root --prompt-for-dba-password 
  768  /data02rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action schema --datadir 
etc/upgrade/2.1.30 --dba root --prompt-for-dba-password 
  769  /data02/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action schema --datadir 
etc/upgrade/2.1.30 --dba root --prompt-for-dba-password 
  770  /data02/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action acl --datadir 
etc/upgrade/2.1.30 --dba root --prompt-for-dba-password 
  771  /data02/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action insert --datadir 
etc/upgrade/2.1.30 --dba root --prompt-for-dba-password 
  772  /data02/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action schema --datadir 
etc/upgrade/2.2.0RC2 --dba root --prompt-for-dba-password 
  773  perl etc/upgrade/upgrade-mysql-schema.pl rt3 root *PW-Redacted* 
sql.queries mysql -u root -p rt3  sql.queries 
  774  perl etc/upgrade/upgrade-mysql-schema.pl 
  775  perl ./etc/upgrade/upgrade-mysql-schema.pl 
  777  cd /data02/rt3/local/plugins/RT-FM/etc/upgrade/ 
  778  perl ./upgrade-mysql-schema.pl 
  779  perl ./upgrade-mysql-schema.pl rt3 root *PW-Redacted* 
  780  perl ./upgrade-mysql-schema.pl rt3 root *PW-Redacted*  sql.queries 

  782  service httpd restart 
  783  vi /data02/rt3/etc/RT_SiteConfig.pm 
  784  service httpd restart 
  785  perl -c /data02/rt3/etc/RT_SiteConfig.pm 
  798  cd /data02/RTFM-2.4.3/ 
  799  perl Makefile.PL 
  800  make install 
  804  /data02/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action schema --datadir 
etc/upgrade/2.1.0 
  806  /data02/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action --dba root schema 
--datadir etc/upgrade/2.1.0 
  807  /data02/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action schema --dba root 
--datadir etc/upgrade/2.1.0 
  808  /data02/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action acl --dba root 
--datadir etc/upgrade/2.1.0 
  809  /data02/rt3/sbin/rt-setup-database --action insert --dba root 
--datadir etc/upgrade/2.1.0 
  812  /data02/rt3/sbin/rt

[rt-users] AUTO: Rezty Felty is out of the office (returning 08/22/2011)

2011-08-18 Thread Rezty Felty

I am out of the office until 08/22/2011.

Avaialable at 816.559.1196 for emergencies.


Note: This is an automated response to your message  Re: [rt-users] Dump
all except tickets+attachments? sent on 8/18/2011 7:33:11 AM.

This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
This message, including any attachments, is for the designated recipient
only and/or Hallmark Cards, Inc. employees.  It may contain privileged,
proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have received it in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.  Any
other use of the e-mail, disclosure of the information, or distribution by
you is prohibited.


RT Training Sessions (http://bestpractical.com/services/training.html)
*  Chicago, IL, USA  September 26  27, 2011
*  San Francisco, CA, USA  October 18  19, 2011
*  Washington DC, USA  October 31  November 1, 2011
*  Melbourne VIC, Australia  November 28  29, 2011
*  Barcelona, Spain  November 28  29, 2011