Re: [rt-users] mysql DB engine ndbdcluster

2016-12-15 Thread Brumm, Torsten / Kuehne + Nagel / Ham GI-ID
Hi Reinhold, whats the goal of doing this? Not sure with ndbcluster, but we do it with percona cluster and this does very well. Torsten -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: rt-users [mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] Im Auftrag von Reinhold Pescoller Gesendet: Dienstag, 13.

Re: [rt-users] mysql DB engine ndbdcluster

2016-12-15 Thread Alex Vandiver
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:42:42 -0500 Mike Diehl wrote: > At the risk of picking a fight, I'd like to understand this a bit better. Happy to explain more -- and my instinct may have been wrong on one count; see below. > As long as the database supports minimum functions,

Re: [rt-users] mysql DB engine ndbdcluster

2016-12-14 Thread Mike Diehl
At the risk of picking a fight, I'd like to understand this a bit better. As long as the database supports minimum functions, such as transactions, joins, datatypes, etc., why should an application care about the underlying storage engine? Are you trying to imply that ndbcluster simply isn't

Re: [rt-users] mysql DB engine ndbdcluster

2016-12-13 Thread Alex Vandiver
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:25:37 +0100 Pescoller Reinhold wrote: > Thanks for your informations. > > I tried to do so but rt give me an error that innodb is required and > that I should upgrade my tables. > Have I to change this direct in the code? lib/RT/Handle.pm:

Re: [rt-users] mysql DB engine ndbdcluster

2016-12-13 Thread Alex Vandiver
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:28:41 +0100 Reinhold Pescoller wrote: > Is there some possibilty to change the default db engine from innodb to > ndbdcluster in rt4? RT assumes REPEATABLE READ isolation; you may encounter subtle and difficult to diagnose bugs under READ COMMITTED