Hi Reinhold,
whats the goal of doing this? Not sure with ndbcluster, but we do it with
percona cluster and this does very well.
Torsten
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: rt-users [mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] Im Auftrag von
Reinhold Pescoller
Gesendet: Dienstag, 13.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 09:42:42 -0500
Mike Diehl wrote:
> At the risk of picking a fight, I'd like to understand this a bit better.
Happy to explain more -- and my instinct may have been wrong on one
count; see below.
> As long as the database supports minimum functions,
At the risk of picking a fight, I'd like to understand this a bit better.
As long as the database supports minimum functions, such as transactions,
joins, datatypes, etc., why should an application care about the underlying
storage engine?
Are you trying to imply that ndbcluster simply isn't
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 12:25:37 +0100
Pescoller Reinhold wrote:
> Thanks for your informations.
>
> I tried to do so but rt give me an error that innodb is required and
> that I should upgrade my tables.
> Have I to change this direct in the code?
lib/RT/Handle.pm:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:28:41 +0100
Reinhold Pescoller wrote:
> Is there some possibilty to change the default db engine from innodb to
> ndbdcluster in rt4?
RT assumes REPEATABLE READ isolation; you may encounter subtle and
difficult to diagnose bugs under READ COMMITTED