- "Kenneth F Crocker" wrote:
> I have been given the opportunity to have a new development zone
> created for RT. I was asked if I wanted the new zone to be Linux or
> Solaris based. So, all you gurus out there, what's best?
Sorry to be so late chiming in on this, Ken; I've been following
> -Original Message-
> From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
> [mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf
> Of Gary Greene
> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 2:44 PM
> To: John Arends; rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] A
Ken Crocker wrote:
> John,
>
>
> We are currently running 3.6.4, but DESPERATELY want to upgrade to
> 3.8.2. Hence the desire to get this new zone set up right FIRST, before
> trying to upgrade. We are an Oracle house, so that's not on the table.
> So far, I'm leaning toward Linux, but I h
> -Original Message-
> From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
> [mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf
> Of John Arends
> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 1:16 PM
> To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] Advice for
-Original Message-
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Sean
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 1:55 PM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Advice for New Machine
> Can I assume your voting for Li
> Can I assume your voting for Linux?
Within the context of RT I don't understand what "voting for Linux" is
supposed to mean. RT doesn't care about what kernel is running. It only
cares about the supporting software, which itself is also independent of
the kernel.
Based on my experience, I
I am running RT 3.8.2 on Slackware 12.0. I originally installed
3.6. and upgraded to 3.8.0 and then 3.8.2. The original install was
perfectly clean; no mess, no fuss. Upgrades were equally simple, once I
figured to actually do all of the upgrade and not just part of it.
--
-- =
From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
[rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of Sean [s...@ttys0.net]
Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 1:56 AM
To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Subject: Re: [rt-users] Advice for New Machine
On Fri, 2009
Sean,
Can I assume your voting for Linux?
Kenn
On 3/13/2009 1:26 PM, Sean wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 15:16 -0500, John Arends wrote:
Gary Greene wrote:
I would go CentOS for the machine if you're a RH person, since it is
practically the same thing, and there are more than a fe
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 15:16 -0500, John Arends wrote:
> Gary Greene wrote:
> > I would go CentOS for the machine if you're a RH person, since it is
> > practically the same thing, and there are more than a few of us CentOS
> > users running RT with our own RPMs.
> >
> What version of RT are y
John,
We are currently running 3.6.4, but DESPERATELY want to upgrade to
3.8.2. Hence the desire to get this new zone set up right FIRST, before
trying to upgrade. We are an Oracle house, so that's not on the table.
So far, I'm leaning toward Linux, but I haven't heard from Jesse or
Rusla
Gary Greene wrote:
> I would go CentOS for the machine if you're a RH person, since it is
> practically the same thing, and there are more than a few of us CentOS
> users running RT with our own RPMs.
>
What version of RT are you running on top of CentOS? With 3.8.2 there
are so many dependen
> -Original Message-
> From: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
> [mailto:rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com] On Behalf Of jul
> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 12:56 PM
> To: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
> Subject: Re: [rt-users] Advice for New Machine
>
Ken Crocker a écrit :
> John,
>
>
> Thanks. That's sounds like a good thing to keep in mind. Anyone else?
>
Yes :
3 servers :
1) for RT ;
2) one for the DB (if you plan postgres or oracle) (I recommend Pg) so
that you can tune it easily (sysctl in kernel will impact all the
processes, and that
John,
Thanks. That's sounds like a good thing to keep in mind. Anyone else?
Kenn
LBNL
On 3/13/2009 12:25 PM, John Arends wrote:
I have a bias towards Linux for this purpose. RT seems to be pushing the
envelope with bleeding edge everything, and Solaris and bleeding edge
don't mix.
Kenn
I have a bias towards Linux for this purpose. RT seems to be pushing the
envelope with bleeding edge everything, and Solaris and bleeding edge
don't mix.
Kenneth F Crocker wrote:
> To all (especially Jesse and Ruslan),
>
>
> I have been given the opportunity to have a new development zone cr
To all (especially Jesse and Ruslan),
I have been given the opportunity to have a new development zone created
for RT. I was asked if I wanted the new zone to be Linux or Solaris based. So,
all you gurus out there, what's best? I know that most of this stuff was
designed for Solaris, but i
17 matches
Mail list logo
