On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 07:56:25AM +0100, Emmanuel Lacour wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 02:53:52AM +0100, Torsten Brumm wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
just saw this patch is against 3.8.6, does this mean it is included in
3.8.7/8?
3.8.7, no
3.8.8, not yet (@BPS, many users want it,
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 02:53:52AM +0100, Torsten Brumm wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
just saw this patch is against 3.8.6, does this mean it is included in
3.8.7/8?
3.8.7, no
3.8.8, not yet (@BPS, many users want it, anyone to review it?)
___
Hi Emmanuel,
just saw this patch is against 3.8.6, does this mean it is included in
3.8.7/8?
Torsten
2010/3/13 Emmanuel Lacour elac...@easter-eggs.com
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 02:01:43PM -0500, Joe Kirby wrote:
Currently RT Custom fields offer Mandatory, Digits, Year
I would like to
Currently RT Custom fields offer Mandatory, Digits, Year
I would like to create a CF which require date validation and always
ensures formatting (mm/dd/)
Is this something that must be done at the Perl level or can it be
done via online RT config CF management?
TIA
Joe
Joe Kirby ,
You can do this via reg exp!
Torsten
- Originalnachricht -
Von: rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
rt-users-boun...@lists.bestpractical.com
An: rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com rt-users@lists.bestpractical.com
Gesendet: Fri Mar 12 20:01:43 2010
Betreff: [rt-users] Date Validation
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 15:00, Brumm, Torsten / Kuehne + Nagel / Ham
MI-ID torsten.br...@kuehne-nagel.com wrote:
You can do this via reg exp!
You can do formatting, but not validation without some extended/experimental
RE features resulting in a hairy expression.
02/31/2010 anyone?
--
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 02:01:43PM -0500, Joe Kirby wrote:
Currently RT Custom fields offer Mandatory, Digits, Year
I would like to create a CF which require date validation and always
ensures formatting (mm/dd/)
Is this something that must be done at the Perl level or can it be
