Re: [rt-users] Ticket replies not going to another queue

2014-06-03 Thread Guadagnino Cristiano
Kevin Falcone ha scritto:
 On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 03:07:05PM +, Guadagnino Cristiano wrote:
 While we understand this use case (and in fact have developed code for
 users who needed to be able to email other RT queues from inside RT):
 Is this something you have developed under a paid contract or is it part
 of the standard RT? If so, I may have missed something.
 It is something we have delivered to customers and has not seen a
 public release.  Before public release, it would require refactorings
 to make supporting it in future releases easier and there has not been
 sufficient clamor nor support for it.

 -kevin

Oh, ok thank you.
Please add my +1 to this.

Bye
Cris
-- 
RT Training - Boston, September 9-10
http://bestpractical.com/training


[rt-users] Ticket replies not going to another queue

2014-05-30 Thread Guadagnino Cristiano
Hi all,
RT usage is taking off lately here: we started with one division using 
it, and now there are four divisions using it and a fifth coming soon.

We have been using just one RT instance, using groups and ACLs to 
separate the queues of one division from the others.
Every division has its own email address that forwards to RT, and 
everything has been working very well till now.

However, we have had a little nuisance that is slowly becoming bigger 
due to the increased number of users and requestors.

The problem arises when one requestor (requestors often are completely 
unaware of the fact we are using RT internally) send a ticket to a 
division, and that division replies that the request should be made to 
another division. At this point, the requestor often takes the reply and 
forwards it to the other division, leaving it intact.
Now, if the other division is using RT, the mail message from the 
requestor is again turned into a ticket and - due to the fact that it 
already contains a ticket number - it is appended to the old ticket 
thread instead of creating a new ticket in the other division's queues.

Is anybody having this issue? How did you solve it?

Ideally I think RT should append to the original ticket only if the 
receiving address is the same as the original ticket. Or at least, this 
is how it could work in our environment. Anybody foreseeing possible 
problems with this approach?

Thank you in advance.
Bye
Cris
-- 
RT Training - Boston, September 9-10
http://bestpractical.com/training


Re: [rt-users] Ticket replies not going to another queue

2014-05-30 Thread k...@rice.edu
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:56:17PM +, Guadagnino Cristiano wrote:
 Hi all,
 RT usage is taking off lately here: we started with one division using 
 it, and now there are four divisions using it and a fifth coming soon.
 
 We have been using just one RT instance, using groups and ACLs to 
 separate the queues of one division from the others.
 Every division has its own email address that forwards to RT, and 
 everything has been working very well till now.
 
 However, we have had a little nuisance that is slowly becoming bigger 
 due to the increased number of users and requestors.
 
 The problem arises when one requestor (requestors often are completely 
 unaware of the fact we are using RT internally) send a ticket to a 
 division, and that division replies that the request should be made to 
 another division. At this point, the requestor often takes the reply and 
 forwards it to the other division, leaving it intact.
 Now, if the other division is using RT, the mail message from the 
 requestor is again turned into a ticket and - due to the fact that it 
 already contains a ticket number - it is appended to the old ticket 
 thread instead of creating a new ticket in the other division's queues.
 
 Is anybody having this issue? How did you solve it?
 
 Ideally I think RT should append to the original ticket only if the 
 receiving address is the same as the original ticket. Or at least, this 
 is how it could work in our environment. Anybody foreseeing possible 
 problems with this approach?
 
 Thank you in advance.
 Bye
 Cris

Hi Cris,

We a more general Helpdesk as one of the areas using RT and they have
the rights to put a ticket in any of the other areas' submission queues.
Then if something is mis-routed, we just drop it in the Helpdesk submission
queue for re-routing.

Regards,
Ken
-- 
RT Training - Boston, September 9-10
http://bestpractical.com/training


Re: [rt-users] Ticket replies not going to another queue

2014-05-30 Thread Guadagnino Cristiano

 On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:56:17PM +, Guadagnino Cristiano wrote:
 Hi all,
 RT usage is taking off lately here: we started with one division using
 it, and now there are four divisions using it and a fifth coming soon.

 We have been using just one RT instance, using groups and ACLs to
 separate the queues of one division from the others.
 Every division has its own email address that forwards to RT, and
 everything has been working very well till now.

 However, we have had a little nuisance that is slowly becoming bigger
 due to the increased number of users and requestors.

 The problem arises when one requestor (requestors often are completely
 unaware of the fact we are using RT internally) send a ticket to a
 division, and that division replies that the request should be made to
 another division. At this point, the requestor often takes the reply and
 forwards it to the other division, leaving it intact.
 Now, if the other division is using RT, the mail message from the
 requestor is again turned into a ticket and - due to the fact that it
 already contains a ticket number - it is appended to the old ticket
 thread instead of creating a new ticket in the other division's queues.

 Is anybody having this issue? How did you solve it?

 Ideally I think RT should append to the original ticket only if the
 receiving address is the same as the original ticket. Or at least, this
 is how it could work in our environment. Anybody foreseeing possible
 problems with this approach?

 Thank you in advance.
 Bye
 Cris

 Hi Cris,

 We a more general Helpdesk as one of the areas using RT and they have
 the rights to put a ticket in any of the other areas' submission queues.
 Then if something is mis-routed, we just drop it in the Helpdesk submission
 queue for re-routing.

 Regards,
 Ken


Ken, thank you for your reply.
This is what we do if it is immediately apparent to us that the request 
should be routed to another division.

Probably my example was a bit too simplistic, however the fact is that 
sometimes the requestor feels the urge to reissue a rejected request to 
a different division.

In that case we're out of luck, as we see the ticket re-opening the old 
thread, instead of opening a new ticket in another queue.

Any other suggestions?

Bye
Cris
-- 
RT Training - Boston, September 9-10
http://bestpractical.com/training


Re: [rt-users] Ticket replies not going to another queue

2014-05-30 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:56:17PM +, Guadagnino Cristiano wrote:
 The problem arises when one requestor (requestors often are completely 
 unaware of the fact we are using RT internally) send a ticket to a 
 division, and that division replies that the request should be made to 
 another division. At this point, the requestor often takes the reply and 
 forwards it to the other division, leaving it intact.
 Now, if the other division is using RT, the mail message from the 
 requestor is again turned into a ticket and - due to the fact that it 
 already contains a ticket number - it is appended to the old ticket 
 thread instead of creating a new ticket in the other division's queues.
 
 Is anybody having this issue? How did you solve it?

While we understand this use case (and in fact have developed code for
users who needed to be able to email other RT queues from inside RT):

 Ideally I think RT should append to the original ticket only if the 
 receiving address is the same as the original ticket. Or at least, this 
 is how it could work in our environment. Anybody foreseeing possible 
 problems with this approach?

This workflow will never become the default RT workflow.  Too many
people (including us) rely on email finding their way to an RT ticket
regardless of whether they've moved to a separate escalation queue or
just to the 'correct' queue.

Also consider the many many people who have 5+ email addresses all
feed into one queue.

Assuming usage of a modern RT, the following extension forces creation
of new tickets when a reply comes in to a resolved ticket.  You could
either use it as is, or modify it to check To: (and Cc:) vs Queue's
correspond address and then trigger the new ticket creation.

https://metacpan.org/release/RT-Extension-RepliesToResolved

-kevin


pgpPy072m7JLo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
RT Training - Boston, September 9-10
http://bestpractical.com/training

Re: [rt-users] Ticket replies not going to another queue

2014-05-30 Thread Guadagnino Cristiano
Kevin Falcone ha scritto:
 On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:56:17PM +, Guadagnino Cristiano wrote:
 The problem arises when one requestor (requestors often are completely
 unaware of the fact we are using RT internally) send a ticket to a
 division, and that division replies that the request should be made to
 another division. At this point, the requestor often takes the reply and
 forwards it to the other division, leaving it intact.
 Now, if the other division is using RT, the mail message from the
 requestor is again turned into a ticket and - due to the fact that it
 already contains a ticket number - it is appended to the old ticket
 thread instead of creating a new ticket in the other division's queues.

 Is anybody having this issue? How did you solve it?
 While we understand this use case (and in fact have developed code for
 users who needed to be able to email other RT queues from inside RT):
Kevin, I am curious about this.
Is this something you have developed under a paid contract or is it part 
of the standard RT? If so, I may have missed something.

 Ideally I think RT should append to the original ticket only if the
 receiving address is the same as the original ticket. Or at least, this
 is how it could work in our environment. Anybody foreseeing possible
 problems with this approach?
 This workflow will never become the default RT workflow.  Too many
 people (including us) rely on email finding their way to an RT ticket
 regardless of whether they've moved to a separate escalation queue or
 just to the 'correct' queue.

 Also consider the many many people who have 5+ email addresses all
 feed into one queue.

 Assuming usage of a modern RT, the following extension forces creation
 of new tickets when a reply comes in to a resolved ticket.  You could
 either use it as is, or modify it to check To: (and Cc:) vs Queue's
 correspond address and then trigger the new ticket creation.

 https://metacpan.org/release/RT-Extension-RepliesToResolved

 -kevin

Thank you Kevin, I think I'll be perusing this extension.
BTW, we're using RT 4.2.3.

Bye
Cris
-- 
RT Training - Boston, September 9-10
http://bestpractical.com/training


Re: [rt-users] Ticket replies not going to another queue

2014-05-30 Thread Kevin Falcone
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 03:07:05PM +, Guadagnino Cristiano wrote:
  While we understand this use case (and in fact have developed code for
  users who needed to be able to email other RT queues from inside RT):

 Is this something you have developed under a paid contract or is it part 
 of the standard RT? If so, I may have missed something.

It is something we have delivered to customers and has not seen a
public release.  Before public release, it would require refactorings
to make supporting it in future releases easier and there has not been
sufficient clamor nor support for it.

-kevin


pgpZII5rvGKim.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
RT Training - Boston, September 9-10
http://bestpractical.com/training