On 5/05/2014 9:12 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Commit it but I don't know that it removes BSP_SMALL_MEMORY as much as
it replaces it with a better mechanism. I still have pending patches to
remove the define and all uses. :)
This patch does not address the removal of BSP_SMALL_MEMORY. I thought
mi
Provide a file per BSP to list tests that do not build for a BSP. This change
removes the BSP_SMALL_MEMORY hack from the code. That hack was a
mistake.
Provide configuration files for each BSP with tests that cannot build.
---
.../lm3s69xx/make/custom/lm3s3749-testsuite.tcfg | 29 +++
.../l
On 24/04/2014 4:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 2014-04-24 07:44, Chris Johns wrote:
Provide a file per BSP to list tests that do not build for a BSP. This
change
removes the BSP_SMALL_MEMORY hack from the code. That hack was a
mistake.
Provide configuration files for each BSP with tests that
On 2014-04-24 07:44, Chris Johns wrote:
Provide a file per BSP to list tests that do not build for a BSP. This change
removes the BSP_SMALL_MEMORY hack from the code. That hack was a
mistake.
Provide configuration files for each BSP with tests that cannot build.
I think these optional BSP spec
On 2014-04-24 07:44, Chris Johns wrote:
Provide a file per BSP to list tests that do not build for a BSP. This change
removes the BSP_SMALL_MEMORY hack from the code. That hack was a
mistake.
Provide configuration files for each BSP with tests that cannot build.
---
.../lm3s69xx/make/custom/lm
Provide a file per BSP to list tests that do not build for a BSP. This change
removes the BSP_SMALL_MEMORY hack from the code. That hack was a
mistake.
Provide configuration files for each BSP with tests that cannot build.
---
.../lm3s69xx/make/custom/lm3s3749-testsuite.cfg| 29 +++
.../l
