Re: RSB and C++ Model

2014-03-25 Thread Chris Johns
On 25/03/2014 5:16 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: On 3/24/2014 11:29 PM, Chris Johns wrote: On 25/03/2014 4:41 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: On 3/24/2014 12:36 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 03/24/2014 06:14 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi My most recently built toolset seems to be using pthreads instead o

Re: RSB and C++ Model

2014-03-24 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 3/24/2014 11:29 PM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 25/03/2014 4:41 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> On 3/24/2014 12:36 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 03/24/2014 06:14 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi My most recently built toolset seems to be using pthreads instead of the RTEMS thread cod

Re: RSB and C++ Model

2014-03-24 Thread Chris Johns
On 25/03/2014 4:41 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: On 3/24/2014 12:36 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 03/24/2014 06:14 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi My most recently built toolset seems to be using pthreads instead of the RTEMS thread code. Any ideas? Its due to this patch: http://git.rtems.org/rtems

Re: RSB and C++ Model

2014-03-24 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 3/24/2014 12:36 PM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 03/24/2014 06:14 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> Hi >> >> My most recently built toolset seems to be using pthreads instead >> of the RTEMS thread code. Any ideas? >> > Its due to this patch: > > http://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/tree/tools/4.11/gcc/gc

Re: RSB and C++ Model

2014-03-24 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 03/24/2014 06:14 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: Hi My most recently built toolset seems to be using pthreads instead of the RTEMS thread code. Any ideas? Its due to this patch: http://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/tree/tools/4.11/gcc/gcc-rtems-thread-model-posix-1.diff We should really avoid using