*I like the suggestion in the last paragraph. :)*

*

*

*New poll marks only small step*

The Bowl Championship Series has made a change in its formula to determine a national championship game, and it has a chance to work out well.

Organizers have produced a new poll, which will replace The Associated Press in the BCS formula. The AP still will have a Top 25, but it has told the BCS that it can't use its rankings.

My first thought was, "Oh, great, another poll." I can't wait for the day when the new BCS poll, the AP rankings and the USA Today coaches' poll elect three different champions. At least that wouldn't be like some activities that have nearly every other school claiming to have won a national championship.

But the new poll, which will be called the Harris Interactive College Football Poll, has an advantage over the AP and coaches' rankings.

It won't start until a month into the season. It might work better to start two months into the season, but at least it won't start in the preseason.

The problem with most rankings is that voters typically go back to the previous poll, move teams up when they win and drop them when they lose. So if you're ranked high in the preseason, you've got an advantage over lower-ranked teams.

Auburn in 2004 provided a perfect example of this. Even though the Tigers never lost, they didn't rise higher than third in any of the preseason rankings because preseason No. 1 Southern California and preseason No. 2 Oklahoma never lost, either.

While everything worked out, and the best team (Southern California) wound up winning the national title, it still smacked of unfairness that Auburn essentially got eliminated from the championship game in the preseason.

The Harris poll plans to use 114 voters, which is almost twice as many as the AP and USA Today use. Last year, the AP had 65, while USA Today relied upon 61 coaches.

The new poll will include former players and coaches, plus media representatives. Here's the key part: All 11 NCAA Division I-A conferences and independent teams will be represented by 10 voters each. Each was allowed to nominate 27 candidates for a position.

I'm wondering if voters will feel pressured to vote the way their conferences want.

For example, if the BCS had started this poll a year ago, would voters put forth by the SEC feel pressured to vote Auburn No. 1 or risk losing their spot in the mix? Will the Harris poll become like Congress where most simply follow the party line and disregard their own thoughts?

However, the AP relies almost completely on newspaper reporters, and that's a problem, too. Last year, the AP voting list included 59 sportswriters, two radio reporters, a television reporter from Miami, Chris Fowler of ESPN, Craig James of ABC and a Sporting News reporter.

Almost all newspaper reporters get to watch only one complete game on Saturdays — the one they're covering. They see only snippets of other games and usually spend Saturday night and/or Sunday morning hurriedly trying to catch up.

It's hard to expect someone like that to know teams well enough to put forth a confident Top 25. Just about the only way is to use the old formula of moving up winners and dropping losers.

And the coaches who vote in the USA Today poll are even worse off. They typically pawn off the job onto a sports information director, who moves up winners and drops losers.

Somebody should come up with the Couch Potato poll. Those people who plop in front of the TV on Saturday morning and stay there until late into the night probably have a better handle on the Top 25 than most voting in the USA Today or AP polls.

_______________________________________________
RTF mailing list
RTF@rolltidefan.net
http://rolltidefan.net/mailman/listinfo/rtf_rolltidefan.net

Reply via email to