Jeff, Sasha, Reshad, et al.,
Please see inline...
Best Regards,
Xiao Min
Original
From: JeffreyHaas
To: Alexander Vainshtein ;
Cc: Reshad Rahman ;BFD WG ;Nitsan Dolev
;Shell Nakash ;James Lian
;
Date: 2022年10月20日 04:17
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: A missing read/write
Jeff,
I do not have a micro-BFD implementation that supports the optional behavior of
7130.
And I have not encountered implementations by other vendors that support this
option (with or without the knob in question). My guess (FWIW) is that this
would make an implementation much more
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 06:01:05PM +, Reshad Rahman wrote:
> Hi Sasha,
> Apologies for the delay.
> Yes this config knob is not present in RFC9314. I don't think it's something
> we did not add on purpose, afair it's something we missed.
I'm going to offer a contrary view. Given that it
> On Oct 19, 2022, at 2:14 PM, Reshad Rahman wrote:
>
> As Mahesh has replied, we can't do this as an erratum. Doing a new document
> with a module which augments ietf-bfd-lag would be the easiest solution, but
> I don't think it's the way to go. A bis of 9314 is more appropriate.
Maybe we
Hi Matthew,
Since the draft submission deadline is Monday October 24th, would it be
possible to extend the WG LC on this document? It would increase the chances
that members will have/take the time to review the document. Or was the date
chosen on purpose to give a few days to the authors to
Hi Sasha,
As Mahesh has replied, we can't do this as an erratum. Doing a new document
with a module which augments ietf-bfd-lag would be the easiest solution, but I
don't think it's the way to go. A bis of 9314 is more appropriate.
Regards,Reshad.
On Monday, October 17, 2022, 03:10:18 PM
