Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks

2022-11-06 Thread xiao.min2
Hi Reshad, Thank you for the thorough review and thoughtful comments. Please see inline... Best Regards, Xiao Min Original From: ReshadRahman To: NVO3 ;rtg-bfd@ietf.org ;Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) ; Date: 2022年11月07日 00:06 Subject: Re: Extending WG LC for

Re: Regarding resetting bfd.LocalDiag back to No Diagnostic (RFC 5880)

2022-11-06 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Glebs, thank you for bringing this to the discussion. I think that the intended behavior is clear, but the text can be further improved by appending it with "every time when the session reaches the Up state", or something along the line. Regards, Greg On Fri, Sep 23, 2022, 15:07 Gļebs

[Technical Errata Reported] RFC5880 (7240)

2022-11-06 Thread RFC Errata System
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5880, "Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD)". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7240 -- Type: Technical Reported by:

Re: Regarding resetting bfd.LocalDiag back to No Diagnostic (RFC 5880)

2022-11-06 Thread Jeffrey Haas
FWIW, my own reading through the text comes to similar conclusion. The transition for the state machine would be an appropriate place to reset the LocalDiag back to No Diagnostic. Glancing at part of Juniper's implementation, it seems we'll reset the Diag when the session returns to Up. It

Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks

2022-11-06 Thread Jeffrey Haas
Xiao Min, On Sat, Nov 05, 2022 at 01:00:27PM +0800, xiao.m...@zte.com.cn wrote: > To restate my question, on a given device receiving, for a given VNI, will > there ever be multiple sets of the same IP addresses? > > If yes, the addition of the MAC addresses for initial multiplexing makes >