Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks

2022-11-08 Thread xiao.min2
Hi Reshad, Thank you for the quick reply. Please see inline [XM-2]... Original From: ReshadRahman To: 肖敏10093570; Cc: n...@ietf.org ;rtg-bfd@ietf.org ;matthew.bo...@nokia.com ; Date: 2022年11月09日 04:12 Subject: Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks

Re: Extending WG LC for draft-ietf-nvo3-bfd-geneve by two weeks

2022-11-08 Thread Reshad Rahman
Hi Xiao Min, Thanks for the prompt response. Inline . On Monday, November 7, 2022, 02:14:05 AM EST, xiao.m...@zte.com.cn wrote: Hi Reshad, Thank you for the thorough review and thoughtful comments. Please see inline... Best Regards, Xiao Min OriginalFrom: ReshadRahman To: 

A question about Encapsulation of BFD for SRv6 Policy

2022-11-08 Thread Greg Mirsky
Dear All, as suggested by the SPRING WG Chairs, I'm bringing the discussion to the mailing list. I think that it is also relevant and might be of interest to the BFD WG community. My questions at the mic were: - What is unique in the encapsulations of a BFD Control message described in the

Segment routing profiles for BFD

2022-11-08 Thread Jeffrey Haas
As commented at the mic during the IETF 115 spring session, there are currently 5 documents covering BFD profiles for various segment routing technologies. One is adopted, the other four have yet to be adopted. I have assembled a list of the documents as part of the regular BFD wiki maintenance: