Jeff, Greg,
Please see inline...
Original
From: JeffreyHaas
To: Greg Mirsky ;
Cc: draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-e...@ietf.org
;rtg-bfd WG ;
Date: 2023年04月14日 04:10
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo WGLC and IPR check
Greg,
> On Apr 12, 2023, at 1:09 PM, Greg Mirsky
Greg,
In general, I think your clarifications are helpful.
The one point I have minor disagreement is "SHOULD be populated/initialized"
... to what?
One option is "an expected value".
Personally, I'd find "an expected value. A suggested value is ..." and use the
defaults below.
That said, I
Greg,
> On Apr 12, 2023, at 1:09 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote:
>
> Dear All,
> after reading the document once more, I've realized that I need help with a
> paragraph in Section 3. Please find my notes in-lined in the original text
> below under the GIM>> tag:
>Once a BFD Unaffiliated Echo
Tom,
> On Apr 13, 2023, at 7:05 AM, t petch wrote:
>
> Taking a step back
>
> On 05/04/2023 10:20, t petch wrote:
>> On 04/04/2023 06:20, Rajaguru Veluchamy (rvelucha) wrote:
>>> Thanks, Tom for review/comments.
>>>
>>> Version been updated for comments. Can u please check.
>
> How widely
Taking a step back
On 05/04/2023 10:20, t petch wrote:
On 04/04/2023 06:20, Rajaguru Veluchamy (rvelucha) wrote:
Thanks, Tom for review/comments.
Version been updated for comments. Can u please check.
How widely is bfd offload implemented by manufacturers? I had a look at
the Juniper
