Re: [mpls] Review of draft-mirsky-mpls-bfd-bootstrap-clarify

The suggestion from Jeff and Carlos seems reasonable to me, although I was not involved in the former mailing-list discussion. Best Regards, Xiao Min Original From: CarlosPignataro To: Jeff Haas ; Cc: m...@ietf.org ;rtg-bfd@ietf. ; Date: 2024年02月05日 11:35 Subject: Re: [mpls] Review of

Re: bfd - Not having a session at IETF 119

Hi Jeff, Reshad, Thanks for the great summary! Just one small update to the wiki, the title of draft-ietf-bfd-unaffiliated-echo has been changed from "Unaffiliated BFD Echo Function" to "Unaffiliated BFD Echo" since -03 version. Cheers, Xiao Min Original From: JeffreyHaas To: rtg-bfd@ietf.

Re: [mpls] Review of draft-mirsky-mpls-bfd-bootstrap-clarify

Thanks Jeff for refreshing the cache on those mailing-list comments. I was part of that conversation, and frankly did not remember them — now I do. And to put that in perspective, that was almost 6 **years** ago! I also missed the Errata, which was good. And there’s also a couple other held for

I-D Action: draft-ietf-bfd-secure-sequence-numbers-13.txt

Internet-Draft draft-ietf-bfd-secure-sequence-numbers-13.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) WG of the IETF. Title: Meticulous Keyed ISAAC for BFD Authentication Authors: Alan DeKok Mahesh Jethanandani Sonal

Re: bfd - Not having a session at IETF 119

While the session request tool downgraded our area director into one of the chairs, it's our intention to not meet at the upcoming IETF 119 in Brisbane. Current status of the working group is on the wiki: https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/bfd It's our hope that

Re: [mpls] Review of draft-mirsky-mpls-bfd-bootstrap-clarify

+bfd WG. Some original comments to Adrian were: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-bfd/SYouXfNrVyKHErqacOuM2fICzMc/ Apparently, Greg didn't consider this worth holding his peace over.