Jeff, Sam and Alvaro,
I guess that thing are different from wg to wg, given some hard core of
IETF wide wg process. I believe this is a good thing, and that practice
in one wg does not define IETF process.
On 2015-09-29 23:43, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
Sam (and to a bigger extent, Alvaro),
On Fri,
osure associated
with it.
_https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2739/_
This adoption poll will end on Friday October 14^th .
Thanks,
Chris and Jeff
--
Loa Anderssonemail: l...@mail01.huawei.com
Senior MPLS Expert l...@pi.nu
Huawei Technologies (consu
MAY carry the local discriminator assigned by it for the BFD
session”.
In other words, I support this errata.
This is because RFC 5884 did not update RFC 4379’s
procedures. And thus a response is needed based on 8029
irr
mailto:m...@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
___
mpls mailing list
m...@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
--
Loa Anderssonemail: l...@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64
BFD Working Group ,
The MPLS working group has started an working group adopton poll on
draft-mirsky-mpls-p2mp-bfd. Support/non-support and comments should be
sent to the mpls mailing list (m...@ietf.org).
/Loa
--
Loa Anderssonemail: l...@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
