cisco.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2018 11:32 AM
To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; Ravi Singh ;
rtg-...@ietf.org
Cc: rtg-...@ietf.org; rtg-bfd@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bfd-y...@ietf.org; YANG
Doctors
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review:
Hi Ravi,
There is indeed lots of common information and this was add
18 at 9:18 AM
To: Ravi Singh , "rtg-...@ietf.org"
Cc: "rtg-...@ietf.org" , "rtg-bfd@ietf.org"
, "draft-ietf-bfd-y...@ietf.org"
, YANG Doctors
Subject: Re: [RTG-DIR] RtgDir review:
Resent-From:
Resent-To: , ,
, ,
Resent-Date: Friday, February 9, 2018 at
+yang doctors
Hi Ravi,
submodules have proved to be unwieldy and offer little advantage over
groupings. I don’t know that we want to crave this model up into submodules.
I’ve copied the YANG doctors to assure this is the consensus as there have been
submodule debates on the NETMOD list in the
