On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 03:28:13AM +, Reshad Rahman (rrahman) wrote:
> Hi Acee,
>
> What I meant is that BFD always augments the control palne protocols in
> ietf-routing model. And the BFD augmentation can be used as-is or mounted in
> LNE or in NI.
Basically:
Whereever ietf-routing is,
Hi Acee,
What I meant is that BFD always augments the control palne protocols in
ietf-routing model. And the BFD augmentation can be used as-is or mounted in
LNE or in NI.
Regards,
Reshad.
On 2018-02-17, 7:46 PM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote:
Hi Reshad,
Are you
Hi Reshad,
Are you saying that BFD would never augment the list of control place protocols
in ietf-routing and always be at the root of the tree (whether it be the
device, LNE, or NI)? I guess it doesn't have to be in the list since it will
never install routes in the routing table.
Thanks,
Ietf-bfd augments the ietf-routing model, that's not conditional. How the
ietf-bfd model is used may vary:
1) It may be used "directly" in a device (i.e no schema mount)
2) It may be schema mounted for use in an LNE
3) It may be schema mounted for use in a VRF
I thought this was the case for all
I thought about that after I replied. I guess you are saying that it is
conceivable for a network device to support ietf-bfd but not support routing
(ietf-routing)?
Thanks,
Acee
On 2/17/18, 1:24 PM, "Reshad Rahman (rrahman)" wrote:
Right, schema-mount can be used in
Right, schema-mount can be used in some cases (logical device or in a VRF) but
doesn’t have to be used in other cases (e.g. network device which doesn't
support VRFs). We will clarify the text, at a certain time we incorrectly
thought that schema mount had to be used in all cases.
Regards,
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 11:11:28PM +, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> * Design of the Data Model
>
> - Do I always have to use schema mount to use these YANG models? If
> so, one might consider I-D.ietf-netmod-schema-mount a normative
> reference. Are you not