: Michael Gorokhovsky ;
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing.auth...@ietf.org; spr...@ietf.org;
rtgwg@ietf.org; draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa.auth...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Is TI-LFA compatible with the default SR algorithm?
On 14/06/2018 13:45, Alexander Vainshtein wrote:
Please note
On 14/06/2018 13:45, Alexander Vainshtein wrote:
Please note that RFC 5286 explicitly states that it is only applicable
to intra-domain routing only with OSPF or IS-IS as IGP.
It does not mention the possibility of local policies overriding
shortest path routing provided by these
...@orange.com; Alexander Vainshtein
;
draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa.auth...@ietf..org
Cc: Michael Gorokhovsky ;
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing.auth...@ietf.org; spr...@ietf.org;
rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Is TI-LFA compatible with the default SR algorithm?
RFC5714 was written when we
ane.litkow...@orange.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 1:57 PM
To: Alexander Vainshtein ;
draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa.auth...@ietf.org
Cc: Stewart Bryant ; Michael Gorokhovsky
;
draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing.auth...@ietf..org; spr...@ietf.org;
rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE:
RFC5714 was written when we were focused on routing in base along normal
Dijkstra shortest paths.
As policy and flexible algorithms become prevalent we need to specify
that any RFC5714 action is compliant to the policies and intended
algorithms along the entirety of its path.
We need to
Hi Sasha,
Could you elaborate on :" I strongly suspect that it is not so, and that these
mechanisms are only compatible with the Strict-SPF. (Actually, I can provide an
example that confirms this suspicion.)" ?
Thanks,
From: spring [mailto:spring-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexander
