Subject: Re: working group adoption poll for draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case
RTGWG,
This WG adoption poll ended last Friday.
One author and one non-author expressed support for adoption,
while no one expressed opposition to adoption. This adoption poll did
not produce any discussion or detailed
RTGWG,
This WG adoption poll ended last Friday.
One author and one non-author expressed support for adoption,
while no one expressed opposition to adoption. This adoption poll did
not produce any discussion or detailed feedback from anyone about the
draft itself.
I think there needs to be more
Yes, support WG adoption as co-author
Regards,
Greg
On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 9:46 AM, Chris Bowers
wrote:
> RTGWG,
>
> The authors of draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case have requested
> that RTGWG adopt this draft as a WG document.
>
I support WG adoption.
Thanks,
Acee
From: Rtg-bfd on behalf of Chris Bowers
Date: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 at 12:46 PM
To: Routing WG , "rtg-...@ietf.org"
Subject: working group adoption poll for draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case
RTGWG,
The authors of draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrr
RTGWG,
The authors of draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case have requested
that RTGWG adopt this draft as a WG document.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mirsky-bfd-p2mp-vrrp-use-case/
Please indicate whether or not you support adoption of the draft
as a WG document. An explanation of why
