Comment on draft-huang-rtgwg-sid-for-networking

Security Considerations Section should reference draft-eastlake-secdispatch-tenantid-consid Thanks, Donald === Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e...@gmail.com

Side meeting on TI-LFA

Hi all, We'll have a side meeting to continue the discussion of draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa. Meeting Time: Wednesday, 7 Nov, 17:00 - 18:00 Location: Palmovka 1/2 Webex Link: https://ietf.webex.com/meet/sidemeetingietf2 More info: IETF 118 Side Meetings | IETF Community Wiki

RE: [EXTERNAL] draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa : A simple pathological network fragment

Yes Ahmed and thanks for Yingzhen for correcting my copy/paste – the date is Nov 8th From: rtgwg on behalf of Ahmed Bashandy Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 at 10:38 AM To: Yingzhen Qu Cc: "rtgwg@ietf.org" , "draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-...@ietf.org" , rtgwg-chairs , Alexander

My comments about TI-LFA and micro-loop avoidance drafts discussion at the RTGWG session today

Hi all, Please see below the comments I planned to present during the discussion at the RTGWG session today: 1. TI-LFA draft is about local handling of failures, while the micro-loop avoidance one is not limited to local reaction and deals with any kind of topology changes, including (but

Re: Comment on draft-huang-rtgwg-sid-for-networking

Hi Donald, Thanks for raising the secruity consideration of standalone servcie ID which would inevitably bring addtional risk exposure, while the service ID designing principle in this draft is make it controlled, managed and governed by an authoritative entity. Anyway security control in data

Re: [EXTERNAL] draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa : A simple pathological network fragment

Wednesday (11/8) 17:00-18:00, Location: Palmovka 1/2 Webex Link: https://ietf.webex.com/meet/sidemeetingietf2 On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 1:30 AM Ahmed Bashandy wrote: > I looked through the various replies and I was not able to find the time > slot or the webex link > > But I am assuming it will be

Re: Side meeting on TI-LFA

Correction, it's Wednesday, 8 Nov 17:00-18:00. Thanks, Yingzhen On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 1:29 AM Yingzhen Qu wrote: > Hi all, > > We'll have a side meeting to continue the discussion of > draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa. > > Meeting Time: Wednesday, 7 Nov, 17:00 - 18:00 > Location:

IETF 118 AIDC Side Meeting - Tuesday 17:00 - 19:00

Hi all, The agenda for the AIDC side meeting is available at: AIDC-IETF118/AIDC Side Meeting Agenda.md at main · Yingzhen-ietf/AIDC-IETF118 (github.com) We have presentations from both industry and

RE: draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa : A simple pathological network fragment

Hi Stewart, Please see inline [Bruno] Orange Restricted From: rtgwg On Behalf Of Stewart Bryant Sent: Friday, November 3, 2023 10:06 AM To: Gyan Mishra Cc: draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-...@ietf.org; rtgwg@ietf.org; rtgwg-chairs ; Alexander Vainshtein Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL]

Re: My comments about TI-LFA and micro-loop avoidance drafts discussion at the RTGWG session today

thanks a lot for the comments One important clarification. Using the post convergence path is not a constraint. In other words, using Ti-LFA does not require a repair path to be post-convergence Other than this clarification, I tend to agree with what you mentioned. A couple of small

draft-bashandy-rtgwg-segment-routing-uloop

[changing the title to the real draft being discussed] Hi Stewart, Please see inline [Bruno] Orange Restricted From: Stewart Bryant Sent: Saturday, November 4, 2023 1:35 PM To: Gyan Mishra Cc: Stewart Bryant ; Alexander Vainshtein ; rtgwg@ietf.org; rtgwg-chairs ;

Re: draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa : A simple pathological network fragment

Stewart, Bruno and Sasha have already responded to your original email. I have other responses to this email which, at best, shows a severe lack of understanding of the draft. See inline starting with #Ahmed Ahmed On 11/2/23 12:29 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote: Let me ask a fundamental

Re: draft-ietf-rtgwg-segment-routing-ti-lfa : A simple pathological network fragment

Hi Ahmed, Authors, & RTGWG WG, After going through all the ML discussions by Sasha, Bruno, Stewart “Many Thanks!!” on TI-LFA v11, here is a synopsis and update of my OPSEC Review this past summer below: I believe the key confusion in the draft is the reference to the uLoop draft. The confusion