Hi authors,
Thanks for the document. I learned a lot while reading it.
I have following questions/comments:
1. Section 1: What is PBX?
2. Section 3.3: What are network conditions exactly? RTT or bandwidth?
Anycast only takes the network proximity into account, not network
Hi all,
We submitted two new IDs about using the IPv6 to unify all kinds of IP tunnels
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-rtgwg-generalized-ipv6-tunnel/ ) and
QUIC tunnel(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-rtgwg-gip6-for-quic/ ).
The rationale is that IPv6 provides many
.
Thanks,
Hang
-Original Message-
From: internet-dra...@ietf.org
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2023 5:38 PM
To: Shengcheng ; Shihang(Vincent) ;
Linda Dunbar
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-sheng-rtgwg-overlay-routing-requirement-00.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-sheng-rtgwg-overlay
Hi,
We would like to request a time slot.
Draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sheng-rtgwg-overlay-routing-requirement/
Presenter: Hang Shi/ Cheng Sheng
Time: 10 minutes.
Best,
Hang Shi
发件人： Yingzhen Qumailto:yingzhen.i...@gmail.com>>
收件人：
Hi Kausik,
You says: In addition to what Linda mentioned, the TE or SRv6 is not an option
within the Cloud Backbone.
I wonder why SRv6 is not an option within the Cloud Backbone. Do you mean that
the Cloud Backbone will not use SRv6 for TE at all or it will not expose the
detail of TE to the
Hi Kausik,
Got it. I agree the best option is to keep two administrative domains loosely
coupled. Is binding SID (RFC 9256) such an option?
Thanks,
Hang
From: rtgwg On Behalf Of Kausik Majumdar
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2023 1:38 PM
To: Shihang(Vincent) ; Linda Dunbar
; Aseem Choudhary
Hi all,
I support the WG adoption of the draft.
It evolves the SDWAN technology by leveraging the cloud as one segment. Since
the IPSec tunnel does not terminate at the cloud GW, the processing is
efficient.
Thanks,
Hang
From: rtgwg On Behalf Of Yingzhen Qu
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2024 2:02
