Re: [Rtk-users] Fwd: Have you encountered this artifact?

Hi, Thanks a lot! It's been merged after minor modifications but would you have one projection to share for creating a small test? You seemed to be unsure of the offsets sign, I think that a wrong sign would show up on the reconstructions. I would suggest to test it if you have time. Simon On

Re: [Rtk-users] Fwd: Have you encountered this artifact?

Dear Simon, I have created a pull-request with the XIM file reader. I'm sorry for being late with the promised pull-request (there were a lot of merge conflicts, so it got postponed). I have cleaned it up, but it is still not flawless as mentioned in the pull-request-message. I have tried to

Re: [Rtk-users] Fwd: Have you encountered this artifact?

Dear Andreas, Today we had the RTK training and some users were looking for a XIM file reader. I pointed to your contributions but any chance to have it put in RTK soon? Thanks in advance, Simon On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Simon Rit wrote: > Hi, > Thanks for

Re: [Rtk-users] Fwd: Have you encountered this artifact?

Hi, Thanks for sharing. There still seems to be some streak artefacts, do you see the same in the Varian reconstruction? I'm looking forward to the pull-request, I think we should try to make the bzip2 optional. Simon On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Andreas Gravgaard Andersen <

Re: [Rtk-users] Fwd: Have you encountered this artifact?

Hi, You can try any iterative reconstruction, they can also handle short scans. Start with a few iterations of rtksart or rtkconjugategradient. However, the nature of the artifacts indicate more a problem in the geometry in my opinion. I have seen such errors when, for example, rotating in the

Re: [Rtk-users] Fwd: Have you encountered this artifact?

Thanks for the suggestions, Simon and Cyril! I have been carefully looking though the geometry and from what I understand of the transformations matrices, the geometry looks correct/(as expected). HOWEVER: I found out that the reason for the Hnd to behave differently were because had used