Re: [rtl] Threads or Tasks?

2000-06-08 Thread Gusa
as i´ve just described. Then i wondered if the best way to make things work like i ´ve just described is using threads or using rtl tasks?? Perhaps threads don´t support priorities and tasks do. Well, all your comments are wellcome. I don´t need that you explain me the different between thread and

Re: [rtl] Threads or Tasks?

2000-06-08 Thread Gusa
Thanks Philip. Then it isn´t possible that a high priority task interrupt the work is doing a low priority task.??? I mean, without hardware interrupts. So, the designer of the system must know at any moment what he want to do. There is not any posibility of having an error in the design. If you

[rtl] Threads or Tasks?

2000-06-06 Thread WORM
Hi all As you´d realized, i´m a newbie rtlinux user. I´ve been wondering during the last days, which are the differents between using threads and using tasks. Sorry for bothering you, but I can´t find the answer to this. Besides, i would like to know the pros and cons of using each other.

Re: [rtl] Threads or Tasks?

2000-06-06 Thread Bernhard Kuhn
WORM wrote: I´ve been wondering during the last days, which are the differents between using threads and using tasks. Sorry for bothering you, but I can´t find the answer to this. The definition for both expression may vary, depending in which "computing-world" you are living in :-) So i