Re: [rtl] the performance of linux run on MPC860

2000-03-29 Thread Kulwinder Atwal
Does not a lower time mean it runs faster? It sounds like linux is running faster than pSOS and VxWorks. Maybe I am mistaken by your test, but it sounds like Linux is faster. - Kal. shaolin zhang wrote: Part 1.1Type: Plain Text (text/plain) Encoding: base64 -- [rtl] ---

Re: [rtl] the performance of linux run on MPC860

2000-03-29 Thread David Schleef
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 01:57:30PM -0700, Kulwinder Atwal wrote: Does not a lower time mean it runs faster? It sounds like linux is running faster than pSOS and VxWorks. Maybe I am mistaken by your test, but it sounds like Linux is faster. - Kal. Without knowing full details of the

Re: [rtl] the performance of linux run on MPC860

2000-03-29 Thread Bernhard Kuhn
Kulwinder Atwal wrote: shaolin zhang wrote: some result is: Linux pSOS VxWorks for(;;) for local variable: 0.52 usec/times 23.81 usec/times 4.79 usec/times for(;;) for global variable: 0.48 usec/times 9.58

Re: [rtl] the performance of linux run on MPC860

2000-03-29 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Without knowing full details of the source code, it is impossible to tell what might be happening. There's no description about what happens inside the loop, what compilers are used, etc. It It's also interesting to know if caches are enabled, etc.