Re: [RTnet-users] real-time stack

Peter Pastor wrote: > Hey, > >> When rtmac is loaded, RT payload frames are still standard (if using >> UDP/IP e.g.), just additional meta frames pop up, and some of them may >> contain tunneled non-RT frames from Linux. But that's only for >> clarification. > Thanks for the info... reading rtnet/

Re: [RTnet-users] real-time stack

Hey, >When rtmac is loaded, RT payload frames are still standard (if using >UDP/IP e.g.), just additional meta frames pop up, and some of them may >contain tunneled non-RT frames from Linux. But that's only for >clarification. Thanks for the info... reading rtnet/Documentation/README.rtmac I notic

Re: [RTnet-users] real-time stack

Peter Pastor wrote: > Hey again, > > I figured out that one can actually use RTnet without changing the ethernet > frame by simply no loading rtmac module. From what I have read in > README.rtmac, as long as rtmac.ko is not loaded the ethernet frame should > not change. When rtmac is loaded, RT p

Re: [RTnet-users] real-time stack

Hey again, I figured out that one can actually use RTnet without changing the ethernet frame by simply no loading rtmac module. From what I have read in README.rtmac, as long as rtmac.ko is not loaded the ethernet frame should not change. However, after compiling, installing and loading the modul