Re: Fog+Libvirt support for shared folders (NFS/9p)

We welcome pull requests, so if you think it should be there I'm happy to help you work on it. That said, in the shorter term you may be better off just using the ruby bindings more directly. On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Matt wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to be able to create NFS pools in li

Re: vCloud 5.5 Support

I haven't heard anybody mention it yet, but we are always open to new contributors and helping people to add stuff. Your best bet is probably to start an issue on the repo and we can see if we can't drum up somebody with time and interest to take it on. Thanks! wes On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:12 PM,

Re: AWS: request both public and specific private IP on new instance.

Thanks for the update, good to know there was a way to work around the issue already available. On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 5:14 AM, James Masson wrote: > > Thanks for the hint. This is what worked for us... > > nat = connection.servers.create( > :vpc_id => vpc.id, > :i

Re: AWS: Error listing internet gateways

To clarify, it sometimes fails to work or never works? Could you open an issue on the repo for it? On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:18 AM, James Masson wrote: > As a quick workaround, we found that... > > connection.internet_gateways.all(filter_goes_here) > > ...works as it should. > > James M > > >

Re: AWS: Error listing internet gateways

though we do have quite a few VPCs! > > thanks > > James M > > > On 12/05/14 19:51, geemus (Wesley Beary) wrote: > >> To clarify, it sometimes fails to work or never works? Could you open an >> issue on the repo for it? >> >> >> On Mon, May 12, 2014

Re: authorize_security_group_ingress -- returns true -- group unchanged

It appears to be working there (based on the true response). How are you seeing the failure manifest? Thanks, wes On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Anthony Acquanita wrote: > compute = Fog::Compute.new({ > :provider => 'AWS' > }) > puts compute.requests > sgp=compute.describe_secu

Re: In-Scope to Extend Fog for Dyn Email Gateway?

Seems good. We may need to discuss where it fits in terms of repo/directory structure, but I definitely think it would make sense to have it. On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Kyle Rames wrote: > I don't see any reason why we wouldn't want to include smtp support. > > What do you think Wes? > > K

Re: Greetings from OpenStack

Thanks for reaching out. Some of the other dev's are much more actively involved in OpenStack so I'll delegate specifics to them, but I did want to thank you for the offer. Hopefully some of the other folks can respond to this further soon. Thanks! wes On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 1:46 AM, Tom Fifield

Re: How generic should providers be?

Ideally it should certainly have records/zones. It may or may not have others to support features that fall outside this common core, but that is a great foundation. On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Nat Welch wrote: > The general goal is that models should act the same across providers. This >

Re: streaming into an iterator

Hmm. I'm not totally certain. I would expect to probably just return chunk (without the *) and use the whole chunk, rather than chunk[0]. At the very least I'd suspect chunk instead of chunk[0] as what you wanted. I'm not super sure beyond that, but hopefully that helps you in the right direction a

Re: Cannot create volume from image using Fog

Hey, I don't have the most experience with the openstack side of things myself. Could you create an issue with this info on github? From there I can usually summon somebody with more direct experience to help out. Thanks! wes On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 8:18 AM, J Ro wrote: > Hi, > > When I use cind

Re: Fog with S3, public url and network requests

Yeah, I think Fred hit the nail on the head. directories/files#get is explicitly a call to fetch info, whereas #new is simply a call to create a local reference Similarly, the #public_url method on file (for better or worse) was made to be cautious and accurate (so it checks that the file exists

Re: Fog with S3, public url and network requests

I think the non-signed urls can be contructed as "https://#{bucket_name}. s3.amazonaws.com/#{object_name}" or something akin to that, should you desire the non-signed versions. Perhaps we should more explicitly have options for constructing those for users though. On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 5:24 AM, D

Re: Fog with S3, public url and network requests

Yeah, or perhaps something like #get_public_http_url even. I definitely agree being more agnostic is a good plan. If you'd like to file an issue around this we can discuss some more and try to make a plan of attack (otherwise these email threads can get lost in the noise sometimes). Thanks! On Tue

Re: How to add Security Group Egress rule in AWS?

It is quite feasible that we simply haven't yet implemented this, looking at the linked docs there I suspect that is in fact the case. We could definitely add it, would you be interested in helping out with that? Thanks! wes On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Hardik Joshi wrote: > How to add Secu

Re: volume_transfer with fog

Yeah, set_tenant appears to be for changing what tenant you are acting as for commands (rather than changing this value on an existing volume). Looking over the code it is not apparent to me that we have transfer capabilities, yet. I suspect they could be added without too much trouble if you wante

Re: How to add Security Group Egress rule in AWS?

Great, thanks! On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Hardik Joshi wrote: > Sure would love to add. Will be submitting once I get it done using my > available free times. > > On 12 November 2014 01:36, geemus (Wesley Beary) wrote: > >> It is quite feasible that we simply ha

Re: AWS :vpc_id on connection.servers.create

We needed to make special patches to get those working, it may be that we just haven't done this yet. I think you can get VPC by setting security group and/or subnet here instead of VPC explicitly, but I could be wrong (and we might need patches). Unfortunately I don't have much directly experienc

Re: Managing AWS RDS

Would you be up for working on a patch for this? Thanks! wes On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Fangyan Du wrote: > Hi, > > We found a bug in the code that manages AWS RDS. > > To reproduce it: > 1. Create a new MySQL RDS instance, set Multi-AZ = false. > 2. Modify the instance to change the Mult

Re: creating objects with user-provided Last-Modified

I already replied to this on stackoverflow, but the short version is that, unfortunately, Last-Modified is not a value that AWS allows to be modified, it will automatically be updated when files are created or updated instead. On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Gavriel Fleischer wrote: > Hi, > > I

v2.0.0.pre.0 is out

This release drops 1.8.7 support, but we expect should otherwise be similar. Please give it a try and let us know if anything breaks. Thanks! wes -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ruby-fog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving email

Re: Populating Mock self.data

I haven't used the openstack side of things in particular much, but the general pattern in fog is to use the create methods to populate the mocks. So if you have mock on and create some resources, then call list_resources, they should be included. Hope that helps, but if not somebody with more spec

Re: kernel_require.rb:55:in `require': cannot load such file -- fog (LoadError : Unable to execute the ruby script as sudo user.

Is it possible that it was installed as root and is now run as non-root (such that permissions don't allow fog to be loaded)? Otherwise I'm not sure from this what might be awry. wes On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 11:34 PM, sreenivas narayan < narayansreenivas...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Guys, > > I an

Re: Fog gem for Hadoop

Cool. If you add me as an administrator to that repo, I should be able to migrate it into the fog organization. That would be a great next step. Are there particular other things you are hoping for in terms of help? Thanks! wes On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Alberto Gutierrez Juanes wrote: > Hi

Re: Fog gem for Hadoop

Sounds great, looking forward to it! wes On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Alberto Gutierrez Juanes wrote: > Great !!! I am gonna make some features more and I add you as an > administrator. I wanna make a nice documentation about it too. > > El lunes, 6 de marzo de 2017, 10:01:19 (UTC-6), geemus

Re: Fog gem for Hadoop

Cool. It looks like I can push to that repo now, but I don't appear to have admin rights (I'll need that to transfer into the fog org). Could you see about escalating my rights so I can do that? Thanks! wes On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Alberto Gutierrez Juanes < aljes...@gmail.com> wrote: > H

Re: Fog gem for Hadoop

I think to me (you have to be an admin in the fog organization in order to transfer things in). So if you transfer to me, I can then transfer it to the org and set everything up. Sorry for the confusion. On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Alberto Gutierrez Juanes < aljes...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sho

Re: Fog gem for Hadoop

Great, thanks! I think you should see an invite to join the org, once you do it should give you full admin writes to the repo again. Just let me know if you have any trouble or I missed anything. Thanks! On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:03 AM, Alberto Gutierrez Juanes < aljes...@gmail.com> wrote: > You

Re: Dynamodb backup

Sorry for the lack of replies here, I suspect the holiday timing may have been involved. Could you describe a bit more of specifically what you are hoping to achieve? Thanks! wes On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:03 AM, sreenivas narayan < narayansreenivas...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > How to tak

Re: Dynamodb backup

I think it would be under fog-aws actually? If it is new, it's quite possible that we just haven't yet managed to add the new functionality. If that is the case we could certainly provide guidance if you wanted to work on that, but otherwise it may not get added right away. In any event, asking in

Re: New provider

Mostly you just need to reach out to us. When you are ready, you can add me (@geemus) as an administrator on your repo and then I can pull it in to the org. We also ask that you would add a couple of the core folks to the gem authors, so that we could push emergency releases if it ever came to it.

Re: New provider

gee...@gmail.com and plribeiro3...@gmail.com would be great, thanks! On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 2:26 AM, Piotr Kliczewski < piotr.kliczew...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Friday, February 23, 2018 at 5:27:55 PM UTC+1, geemus wrote: >> >> Mostly you just need to reach out to us. When you are ready, you

Re: New provider

I'm fine with authors that way in gemspec, fwiw. It is an interesting pattern. Thanks Paulo for checking in and giving feedback! On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 7:04 AM, Paulo Henrique Lopes Ribeiro < plribeiro3...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Piotr. Good morning! > > Sorry i just got to this now. > > I wou

Re: Need some basic information about fog

Could you could detail what you want to do with fog and aws? Thanks! wes On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 6:08 AM, bhavani indra wrote: > Hi guys, > *I am new to fog*. I would like to do a project in fog and aws, > So i am surfing to learn the basics of fog and i have seen a > official website of fog* "fo