Re: Migration from RSpec 1.3 to RSpec 2.x

2012-01-20 Thread Mo Morsi
On 01/12/2012 08:56 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi guys, There have been nice progress in this matter, nevertheless, there are still some packages which depends on RSpec 1.x: $ repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires 'rubygem(rspec)' deltacloud-core-0:0.4.1-6.fc17.src (mfojti

Re: Retire rubygem-mongrel

2012-01-20 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
On 2012-01-20 10:51, Greg Swift wrote: On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:27, Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi, If nobody objects, I am going to retire *rubygem-mongrel* and its associated gems rubygem-gem_plugin, rubygem-fastthread and rubygem-mongrel_cluster. Vit, I only own rubygem-mongrel, I'm not sure

Re: Retire rubygem-mongrel

2012-01-20 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
On 2012-01-20 10:27, Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi, If nobody objects, I am going to retire *rubygem-mongrel* and its associated gems rubygem-gem_plugin, rubygem-fastthread and rubygem-mongrel_cluster. I'm OK with it. Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -- Systems Architect, Kolab Systems AG e: vanm

Re: Retire rubygem-mongrel

2012-01-20 Thread Greg Swift
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 09:27, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi, > > If nobody objects, I am going to retire *rubygem-mongrel* and its > associated gems rubygem-gem_plugin, rubygem-fastthread and > rubygem-mongrel_cluster. > > Mongrel is not maintained anymore [1]. It dos not support Ruby on Rails 3 > ava

Re: Packaging guidelines - Bundler

2012-01-20 Thread Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)
On 2012-01-04 13:57, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:40:52AM -0800, Michael Stahnke wrote: I really dislike bundler. However, from the Ruby ecosystem point of view, it's there and it's not going anywhere. It featured on every rubygem page. It certainly conflicts with the b

Re: Retire rubygem-mongrel

2012-01-20 Thread Guillermo Gómez
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Michael Stahnke wrote: > At Puppet labs we packaged up Unicorn, and rainbows for some testing > and it went pretty well also, especially with Nginx.  I was planning > to clean those up and submit, but looks like you beat me to it. > > Great news for us, Mongrel is

Re: More 1.9.3 fun

2012-01-20 Thread Michael Stahnke
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Mo Morsi wrote: > On 01/20/2012 03:58 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >> Dne 19.1.2012 21:52, Mo Morsi napsal(a): >>> >>> On 01/19/2012 03:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > So, obviously the bundle can't find the C extension.  According to > some research,

Re: Retire rubygem-mongrel

2012-01-20 Thread Michael Stahnke
At Puppet labs we packaged up Unicorn, and rainbows for some testing and it went pretty well also, especially with Nginx. I was planning to clean those up and submit, but looks like you beat me to it. Great news for us, Mongrel is painful to deal with. :) 2012/1/20 Guillermo Gómez : > Relat

Re: Retire rubygem-mongrel

2012-01-20 Thread Guillermo Gómez
Related, im packaging Unicorn and need review of a dep (no problem retiring mongrel): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781884 Guillermo On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi, > > If nobody objects, I am going to retire *rubygem-mongrel* and its associated > gems r

Re: More 1.9.3 fun

2012-01-20 Thread Mo Morsi
On 01/20/2012 03:58 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 19.1.2012 21:52, Mo Morsi napsal(a): On 01/19/2012 03:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: So, obviously the bundle can't find the C extension. According to some research, I see this on rubygems.org "This works because rubygems copies the shared object fro

Retire rubygem-mongrel

2012-01-20 Thread Vít Ondruch
Hi, If nobody objects, I am going to retire *rubygem-mongrel* and its associated gems rubygem-gem_plugin, rubygem-fastthread and rubygem-mongrel_cluster. Mongrel is not maintained anymore [1]. It dos not support Ruby on Rails 3 available in Fedora, the last supported Ruby on Rails version wa

Re: Ruby 1.9.3 rebuild started!

2012-01-20 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
Hi, I added updated versions (3.0.11) of rails-related packages to my repo. They are only available as SRPMS at [1], I didn't create git repos this time. Please, whoever starts updating these packages first, prefer the new 3.0.11 version over the older 3.0.10. Regards, Bohuslav. [1] http://bka

Re: More 1.9.3 fun

2012-01-20 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 19.1.2012 21:52, Mo Morsi napsal(a): On 01/19/2012 03:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: So, obviously the bundle can't find the C extension. According to some research, I see this on rubygems.org "This works because rubygems copies the shared object from ext to lib when the gem is installed." I'