On Wed, Feb 7, 2018, at 5:28 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 02:26:54PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > AsciiBinder is now available in Fedora Rawhide. There is still missing
> > the livereload support, but not sure how important it is.
It'd be nice to see the land for the
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 02:26:54PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> AsciiBinder is now available in Fedora Rawhide. There is still missing
> the livereload support, but not sure how important it is.
Nice -- thank you!
I personally don't care about the livereload support. Brian's
instructions are to
AsciiBinder is now available in Fedora Rawhide. There is still missing
the livereload support, but not sure how important it is.
Vít
Dne 4.1.2018 v 10:14 Brian Exelbierd napsal(a):
> Top Posting: I am not qualified to review ruby packages, but I would like to
> see these get reviewed.
Top Posting: I am not qualified to review ruby packages, but I would like to
see these get reviewed. Barring huge changes, AsciiBinder is part of our
infrastructure for the next while. a/k/a post 4th quarter holidays *bump*
Thanks,
bex
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017, at 6:17 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526056
I submitted review for rubygem-ascii_doctor. The guard is on its way:
https://gitlab.com/jackorp/rubygem-guard
although there will be necessary to resolve funny issues such as:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960064#c9
Vít
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:40:42PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> rubygem-diff_dirs - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518181
> rubygem-sitemap_generator -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1518169
I can *technically* review these, but it would probably be better if
someone
Dne 16.11.2017 v 15:53 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 09:29:50AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> The question for me is if the asciibinder in the current "crippled"
>> state is acceptable and helpful for Fedora documentation team or if we
>> should wait (until the "watch" is
> I'll try to test this soon against Fedora Docs.
I pulled the rpms for ascii_binder, sitemap_generator and git from your COPR.
diff_dirs didn't look like it was building, so I gem installed it.
Installing leads me to need a newer trollop, however that is, as you've pointed
out, only packaged
> Dne 16.11.2017 v 01:09 Jason Brooks napsal(a):
>
> Thx for testing.
>
>
> Thx for pointing this out.
>
>
> Yes, I think so. The good news is that there is ongoing effort to have
> packaged more of these dependencies, but hard to predict ETA.
>
>
> The question for me is if the asciibinder
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 09:29:50AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> The question for me is if the asciibinder in the current "crippled"
> state is acceptable and helpful for Fedora documentation team or if we
> should wait (until the "watch" is ready for example).
I think it's good. I've just been
Dne 16.11.2017 v 01:09 Jason Brooks napsal(a):
>> ~~~
>>
>> Could you please give it another try? Thx.
> Ok, this is working.
Thx for testing.
> I know you said that "watch" won't work, I don't know how critical it is, but
> this functionality is referenced in our contributor guide:
>
> ~~~
>
> Could you please give it another try? Thx.
Ok, this is working. I know you said that "watch" won't work, I don't know how
critical it is, but this functionality is referenced in our contributor guide:
Dne 9.11.2017 v 08:35 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>
> Dne 8.11.2017 v 20:31 Jason Brooks napsal(a):
>>> Actually I've finished 1st version. I am not sure how much is it broken,
>>> since I dropped almost all dependencies [1]. I know for sure, that
>>> "asciibinder watch" does not work. Please give it
Dne 8.11.2017 v 20:31 Jason Brooks napsal(a):
>> Actually I've finished 1st version. I am not sure how much is it broken,
>> since I dropped almost all dependencies [1]. I know for sure, that
>> "asciibinder watch" does not work. Please give it a try and let me know
>> what should be improved.
>
> Actually I've finished 1st version. I am not sure how much is it broken,
> since I dropped almost all dependencies [1]. I know for sure, that
> "asciibinder watch" does not work. Please give it a try and let me know
> what should be improved.
I got this error:
Error:
Problem: conflicting
Hi Bex,
Unfortunately, the packages requires F27+ for build, but they should
work on F26 just fine I hope. Could you try the F28 packages please?
V.
Dne 26.10.2017 v 00:08 Brian (bex) Exelbierd napsal(a):
> Hi Vit,
>
> Could you push a build against F26 so I can test it against the Fedora
Hi Vit,
Could you push a build against F26 so I can test it against the Fedora Docs
repos?
Thanks,
bex
___
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> I setup Copr repository here:
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ascii_binder
>
> Will see how far I can get ... Will try to cut the dependencies as much
> as possible from the beginning ...
Awesome -- thanks!
___
ruby-sig mailing
I setup Copr repository here:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ascii_binder
Will see how far I can get ... Will try to cut the dependencies as much
as possible from the beginning ...
Vít
Dne 6.9.2017 v 12:01 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> I might try to take a look but ...
>
>
>
I might try to take a look but ...
Dne 5.9.2017 v 22:41 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> We're using a new system for http://docs.fedoraproject.org. It's in Ruby, and
> as per tradition requires a number of ruby gems not packaged in Fedora.
>
> The upstream is at
20 matches
Mail list logo
