Dne 07. 01. 21 v 11:20 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
Upgrade/compatibility impact
Is it better to mention about the `%{gem_plugin}` macro for the file
to %files section to the Upgrade/compatibility impact section if it is
encouraged to add it to rubygem- packages?
Dne 07. 01. 21 v 11:28 Jun Aruga napsal(a):
I think we can add not only the upstream github's NEWS.md but also the
ruby-lang's release note too, as obviously the Fedora wiki page's
content is copied from the upstream page.
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2020/12/25/ruby-3-0-0-released/
Though
I think we can add not only the upstream github's NEWS.md but also the
ruby-lang's release note too, as obviously the Fedora wiki page's
content is copied from the upstream page.
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2020/12/25/ruby-3-0-0-released/
Though the ruby-lang page is not mentioned on Ruby
> Upgrade/compatibility impact
Is it better to mention about the `%{gem_plugin}` macro for the file
to %files section to the Upgrade/compatibility impact section if it is
encouraged to add it to rubygem- packages?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/76
We might also add the
> Ruby 3.0.0.preview1 NEWS
Above link text and the actual link
(https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/v3_0_0_preview1/NEWS.md) for the
preview 1 are outdated.
--
Jun | He - His - Him
___
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 5:11 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Hi Rubyists,
>
> The release of Ruby 3.0 is coming close and to be ready for rebuild
> after Christmas, I have submitted the Ruby 3.0 change proposal [1]. It
> is already in `ChangeReadyForWrangler` state, since
Hi Rubyists,
The release of Ruby 3.0 is coming close and to be ready for rebuild
after Christmas, I have submitted the Ruby 3.0 change proposal [1]. It
is already in `ChangeReadyForWrangler` state, since I don't expect any
controversy. But anyway, please review and let me know if you have any
