Re: Rubygem packages SPDX status as of 2022-12-05

2022-12-05 Thread Jarek Prokop
Hi all, Current stats for 2022-12-05 I have also included a list of packages for the field "Action required", where license-validate returns error and the licenses need to be converted to proper SPDX ID. If you'd like to see some other info generated with this, feedback is welcomed. ~~~  

Re: Rubygem packages SPDX status as of 24.11

2022-11-24 Thread Jarek Prokop
Hi, current statistics for specs from 24. 11. are as follows:   * Total rubygems in Fedora: 492   * Total rubygems checked:   485   * Fedora License field and gem2rpm license match and license-validate succeeds: 288/485   * license-validate says they are OK SPDX, but licenses may vary: 331/485

Re: Rubygem packages SPDX status

2022-11-22 Thread Jarek Prokop
Hi all, I have fixed up the script a bit and sprinkled some more processing on top, so I come back with more precise data (still rpm-specs as of 2022-11-14, as with previous email) The state is as follows: * Total of rubygem packages in Fedora: ~~~ $ ls rubygem-*.spec | wc -l 495 ~~~ *

Rubygem packages SPDX status

2022-11-21 Thread Jarek Prokop
Hi, I have been working on the validation of Rubygem licenses with the SPDX format. all work done so far lives in my fedorapeople space: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/jackorp/public_git/spdx_rubygems.git/tree/ It is WIP, including the scripts. (I got a bit sidetracked with validating MIT