Re: Ruby 2.5 - Mass rebuild

2018-01-04 Thread Mamoru TASAKA 

Hello, ruby folks:

Vít Ondruch wrote on 01/04/2018 04:10 PM:

So far, we have build 37 packages and Mamoru is kicking my butt, great job!



Thanks to Vít for ruby 2.5 migration!!

Current ruby 2.5 rebuild status:
$ dnf repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=f28-ruby --qf '%{SOURCERPM}\n' 
--whatrequires 'libruby.so.2.4()(64bit)' | sort | uniq | grep rpm$ | cat -n
 1  clearsilver-0.10.5-43.fc28.src.rpm  - not tried
 2  dislocker-0.7.1-3.fc27.src.rpm - not tried
 3  eruby-1.0.5-38.fc27.src.rpm - not tried
 4  graphviz-2.40.1-14.fc28.src.rpm - not tried
 5  hivex-1.3.14-12.fc28.src.rpm - not tried
 6  kf5-kross-interpreters-17.12.0-1.fc28.src.rpm - not tried
 7  kross-interpreters-4.14.3-9.fc27.src.rpm - not tried

 8  libcaca-0.99-0.34.beta19.fc28.src.rpm
  - rebuild succeeded.

 9  libguestfs-1.37.35-1.fc28.src.rpm
  - trying scratch build 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24009712

10  libprelude-4.0.0-4.fc28.src.rpm
  - rebuilding, scratch build already succeeded.
11  libsbml-5.16.0-1.fc28.src.rpm
  - trying scratch build 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24009735

12  libsedml-0.4.3-5.fc28.src.rpm
  - rebuilding, scratch build already succeeded.

13  nbdkit-1.1.26-1.fc28.src.rpm
  - scratch build fails on some archs (not on all archs)
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24008840

14  openwsman-2.6.3-9.git4391e5c.fc28.src.rpm
  - scratch build fails 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24008468

15  pcs-0.9.160-1.fc28.src.rpm
  - test suite needs rubygem-ffi, which does not build currenely:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24008426

16  rubygem-escape_utils-1.1.0-8.fc27.src.rpm
  - scratch build fails 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24006932

17  rubygem-ffi-1.9.18-3.fc27.src.rpm
  - scratch build fails 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24006941
Looks like rdoc generation fails with ruby segfault, however when I 
try
local rpmbuild, rebuild succeeds. But surely mock build segfaults...

18  rubygem-hitimes-1.2.6-1.fc27.src.rpm
  - scratch build fails randomly:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=23997285
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24006955

19  rubygem-http_parser.rb-0.6.0-6.fc27.src.rpm
  - scratch build fails, this one also seems rdoc generation segfault:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=23996867

20  rubygem-puma-3.10.0-3.fc28.src.rpm
  - scratch build fails on some archs:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24007096

21  rubygem-thin-1.7.2-4.fc27.src.rpm
  - scratch build fails on some archs, and seems to be hanging on some 
archs:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24007124

22  shogun-6.0.0-5.fc27.src.rpm
  - scratch build fails, and build is already failing before ruby side 
change
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=17486

23  subversion-1.9.7-2.fc28.src.rpm
  - scratch build succeeded, will submit real rebuild
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24007573

24  uwsgi-2.0.15-7.fc28.src.rpm
  - scratch build fails: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24007543

Regards,
Mamoru
___
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Hey Ruby packagers: can you help with asciibinder and its dependencies?

2018-01-04 Thread Brian Exelbierd 
Top Posting: I am not qualified to review ruby packages, but I would like to 
see these get reviewed.  Barring huge changes, AsciiBinder is part of our 
infrastructure for the next while. a/k/a post 4th quarter holidays *bump*

Thanks,

bex

On Thu, Dec 14, 2017, at 6:17 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526056
> 
> 
> I submitted review for rubygem-ascii_doctor. The guard is on its way:
> 
> 
> https://gitlab.com/jackorp/rubygem-guard
> 
> 
> although there will be necessary to resolve funny issues such as:
> 
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960064#c9
> 
> 
> Vít
> 
> 
> 
> Dne 16.11.2017 v 09:29 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> >
> > Dne 16.11.2017 v 01:09 Jason Brooks napsal(a):
> >>> ~~~
> >>>
> >>> Could you please give it another try? Thx.
> >> Ok, this is working.
> > Thx for testing.
> >
> >> I know you said that "watch" won't work, I don't know how critical it is, 
> >> but this functionality is referenced in our contributor guide: 
> >> https://github.com/projectatomic/atomic-host-docs/blob/master/contribution/contribution_guide.adoc
> > Thx for pointing this out.
> >
> >> I think maybe that's just a convenience though?
> > Yes, I think so. The good news is that there is ongoing effort to have
> > packaged more of these dependencies, but hard to predict ETA.
> >
> >
> > The question for me is if the asciibinder in the current "crippled"
> > state is acceptable and helpful for Fedora documentation team or if we
> > should wait (until the "watch" is ready for example).
> >
> >
> > Vít
> > ___
> > ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> ___
> ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
ruby-sig mailing list -- ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-sig-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org