Hello, all:
This is now on rawhide (F41):
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-fdd50f44b8
Regards,
Mamoru
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2024/04/19 18:56:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2024/04/19 18:05:
Thanks for the heads up. I assume you are going to land this just for Rawhide,
right
in their test
suites.
Vít
Dne 19. 04. 24 v 10:31 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
I am going to update rubygem-json to 2.7.3 *some day* (when I have enough time).
What is preventing me from doing it now is that due to json change that now
json makes OpenStruct support (dependency
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
I am going to update rubygem-json to 2.7.3 *some day* (when I have enough time).
What is preventing me from doing it now is that due to json change that now
json makes OpenStruct support (dependency) optional, it causes the following
packages FTBFS:
rubygem-actionmailer
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
Today I am going to update rspec series to 3.13.0 on F40.
I tried mass rebuild beforehand, and currently it seems this update
causes no additional build failures.
("No additional build failures" means that there are already some
build failures on some packages, I've
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
I am going to update rubygem-minitest to 5.22.2 on F40.
This version sees some behavior change, perhaps due to:
https://github.com/minitest/minitest/commit/ef839657fe46ecda4f46a6c0fdc670a361374080
Perviously, if there was no tests actually, Minitest showed the message
17:18 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2024/01/04 1:06:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2024/01/03 19:20:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all, I'd like to
thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all around. I really
appreciate
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2024/01/04 1:06:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2024/01/03 19:20:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all, I'd like to
thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all around. I really
appreciate that.
I think we are well
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2024/01/03 19:20:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all, I'd like to
thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all around. I really
appreciate that.
I think we are well prepared for the rebuild, therefore I have
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/21 21:08:
Hi everybody,
I am back with yet another update, this time rev 8e6f63df47. The changes are in
my PR, while the build is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110562000
I have not noticed any noteworthy from upstream POV, but
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2023/12/21 9:04:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/21 0:45:
I have just hit this issue:
~~~
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/lib64/gems/ruby/racc-1.7.3/racc/cparse.so from install of
ruby-bundled-gems-3.3.0~20231219git8e6f63df47-184.fc40.x86_64 conflicts
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/21 0:45:
I have just hit this issue:
~~~
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/lib64/gems/ruby/racc-1.7.3/racc/cparse.so from install of
ruby-bundled-gems-3.3.0~20231219git8e6f63df47-184.fc40.x86_64 conflicts with
file from package
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/20 18:56:
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 17:03 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 11:10 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
7. rubygem-railties
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6695576
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/14 23:10:
Dear Rubyists,
As it turns out, yesterday version was not a big success, as we learned the
hard way (thx Mamoru). So here I am back with updated version, this time rev
e3631277c3. The changes are in my PR and the build is here:
Hello, again:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/14 0:30:
Hi again,
I'm back with yet another update, this time rev a7ad9f3836. The build is
running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110284699
This time, there are several changes I'd like to mention.
* There is included
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/11 21:26:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 RC1 is here:
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2023/12/11/ruby-3-3-0-rc1-released/
And therefore I have updated the PR with recent changes and the build is
running here:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/11 21:26:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 RC1 is here:
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2023/12/11/ruby-3-3-0-rc1-released/
And therefore I have updated the PR with recent changes and the build is
running here:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/11/24 22:17:
Hi,
I am back with yet another update of Ruby 3.3, this time rev 24e0b185ab. The
changes are in my PR and the scratch build is available here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=109487230
This starting to be boring, because there is
are still failing to build.
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2023/10/29 17:09:
Hello, all:
With wonderful work by Vít and friends, again I tried to rebuild all rubygem-foo
packages on Fedora against ruby 3.3.0dev.
For the below failure reports,
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/30 19:37:
Nice, thx for the summary and a few remarks inline.
Dne 29. 10. 23 v 9:09 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
2.
rubygem-addressable
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6576510/
Test suite segfaults constantly...
Isn't
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2023/10/29 17:09:
Hello, all:
With wonderful work by Vít and friends, again I tried to rebuild all rubygem-foo
packages on Fedora against ruby 3.3.0dev.
For the below failure reports,
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/83ecdd1dce18246de631eb3b5d8308145bb269f5
is used
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/30 20:43:
Dne 29. 10. 23 v 9:09 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
14.
rubygem-shoulda-matchers
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6576601/
Lots of:
```
An error occurred while loading
./spec/unit/shoulda/matchers
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/11/01 19:17:
Hi Rubyists,
The release of Ruby 3.3 is coming close and to be ready for rebuild after
Christmas, I have submitted the Ruby 3.3 change proposal [1]. It is already in
`ChangeReadyForWrangler` state, since I don't expect any controversy (it is
mostly copy
Pavel Valena wrote on 2023/11/01 3:42:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 12:36 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 26. 10. 23 v 18:26 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:31 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 25. 10. 23 v 16:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hi, Vít:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/24 23:07
Hello, all:
With wonderful work by Vít and friends, again I tried to rebuild all rubygem-foo
packages on Fedora against ruby 3.3.0dev.
For the below failure reports,
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/83ecdd1dce18246de631eb3b5d8308145bb269f5
is used.
Among ~455 packages, now 16 packages see
Hi, Vít:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/24 23:07:
Hi,
I am back again with updated version of Ruby, this time c44d65427e. Please see
the changes in the upstream PR and test the build (currently in progress) here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108034430
Apart of fixes for
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/20 21:21:
Dne 20. 10. 23 v 14:13 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 10. 23 v 1:48 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/13 0:20:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d. The changes
are in the PR:
Vít, would you take
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/13 0:20:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d. The changes
are in the PR:
Vít, would you take a look at this change?
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/5327
In ruby.git , these are imported from
that
* rubygem-jekyll
itself tries to use tzinfo directly. I will going to add
"BuildRequires (not Requires): tzdata" to jekyll (as it seems it is
not always required).
Mamoru
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 2:10 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sat, Sep 23, 2023 at 7:50 PM Mamoru TASAKA
wrote:
Hello, ruby
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
From devel list:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on 2023/09/22 23:01:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:43:05AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233281#c3
This probably answers my question. So heads up to others.
Dne 22. 09. 23 v 10:39
Hello all, again:
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2023/09/17 22:42:
Okay, so with my initial builds for rubygem- packages, among 456 packages,
50 packages failed to build (1 just fixed one of them, so currently 49).
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/packages
Follow up:
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2023/09/18 20:16:
Hello, again:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/09/18 17:24:
Dne 17. 09. 23 v 15:42 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Some topics:
* rubygem-nifti sees test failure on s390x, this is perhaps big endian issue.
Interesting. nifti failed during mass
Hello, again:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/09/18 17:24:
Dne 17. 09. 23 v 15:42 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Okay, so with my initial builds for rubygem- packages, among 456 packages,
50 packages failed to build (1 just fixed one of them, so currently 49).
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2023/09/14 21:13:
Hello, Vít:
Thank you for initial work for ruby 3.3 .
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/09/12 17:08:
* `%gem_spec` macro with options:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/vondruch/rpms/ruby/blob/77c580dfa85f921d969a8da68eaf6e88987aab8a/f/macros.rubygems#_10
Hello, Vít:
Thank you for initial work for ruby 3.3 .
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/09/12 17:08:
* `%gem_spec` macro with options:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/vondruch/rpms/ruby/blob/77c580dfa85f921d969a8da68eaf6e88987aab8a/f/macros.rubygems#_10
This is my initial version, just to enable
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/18 23:45:
Dne 17. 01. 23 v 15:48 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/04 21:13:
Dne 04. 01. 23 v 8:55 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/03 23:28:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.2 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/04 21:13:
Dne 04. 01. 23 v 8:55 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/03 23:28:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.2 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all, I'd like to
thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all around. I
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/17 23:31:
This seems to be never ending story 臘♂️
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-mail?collection=f38
Vít
Well, I've noticed this, so I tried to reproduce, but it seems unreproducible.
I suspected:
* This is due to rspec-expectations
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/01/03 23:28:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.2 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all, I'd like to
thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all around. I really
appreciate that. Due to this, I feel we are in better shape then we ever was
and we
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/23 22:30:
Dne 23. 12. 22 v 8:46 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/22 17:48:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf. The changes
are in dist-git and the build is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/12/23 16:46:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/22 17:48:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf. The changes
are in dist-git and the build is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95591030
I am still surprised
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/22 17:48:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to 6af6857ecf. The changes
are in dist-git and the build is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=95591030
I am still surprised that this cycle, there are not big breakages. So
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
I've updated rubygem-zeitwerk from 2.5.4 to 2.6.6.
2.5.4 FTBFS with ruby3.2:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ruby-3.2/package/rubygem-zeitwerk/
This commit is needed to fix this build error:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/13 17:29:
2) webkitgtk -
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/vondruch/ruby-3.2/build/5132009/
Obviously, the issue is with independent rubygem-json, which was not build by
mass-prebuild. This is probably tricky due to rubygem-json being subpackage of
ruby
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/12/02 21:02:
Dne 21. 10. 22 v 15:33 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 21. 10. 22 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
* Now rpm supports tilde, tilde is regarded as older than non-tilde version.
So we can use, say, ruby-3.2.0~preview2-170.20221021gitabcdefg.fc38
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/11/04 1:39:
Dne 03. 11. 22 v 17:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/11/04 0:37:
Dne 03. 11. 22 v 15:37 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/11/03 22:22:
Dne 03. 11. 22 v 14:07 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/11
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/11/04 0:37:
Dne 03. 11. 22 v 15:37 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/11/03 22:22:
Dne 03. 11. 22 v 14:07 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/11/03 21:19:
I have provided negative karma for F37 for the moment:
https
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/11/03 22:22:
Dne 03. 11. 22 v 14:07 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/11/03 21:19:
I have provided negative karma for F37 for the moment:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-f7975d0e6a
However, not sure if it is not too late
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/11/03 21:19:
I have provided negative karma for F37 for the moment:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-f7975d0e6a
However, not sure if it is not too late already, since the update was submitted
for stable. Mamoru, could you please check the status
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/17 23:24:
Hi again,
Here is yet another version from Friday:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92978738
Nothing really special from Ruby POV, but I have enabled out-of-source build,
as was previously discussed here:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/13 0:26:
Hi again,
I have prepared update again. You can see the changes in the PR [1] I have
opened (not intended to be merged, just to show the diff) and the scratch build
is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92950720
I have not spot
Hello, Vít:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/10/01 17:10:
And I should really update Pry, because I saw Pry related issues on more places.
For now, may I just backport the below?
https://github.com/pry/pry/commit/b548784b4a31b49026b69849430a9ec9072ae94a
At least the above change fixes
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/29 20:15:
And another issue for Mamoru, this time from rspec-core:
~~~
expected "\nAn error occurred while loading ./spec/example_spec.rb.\nFailure/Error:\n
RSpec.describe Fixnum d...files took 0.05699 seconds to load)\n0 examples, 0 failures, 1 error
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/09/26 19:57:
Which fails due to Racc:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/rubygems-testing/build/4871170/
The issue seems to be fixed upstream:
https://github.com/ruby/racc/pull/191
It is unfortunate that such a minor bug might influence quite lot of
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/08/02 19:21:
Hi,
Just heads up that I have noticed that RoR (and probably more) are broken after
Minitest 5.16 landed in Rawhide. This is the RoR commit fixing the issues:
https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/9766eb4a833c26c64012230b96dd1157ebb8e8a2
However, for us
Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching (August
2022).
Policy:
Hello, all:
Now I was going to update rubygem-kramdown, resulting in build failure.
Then I've noticed that on rawhide, "rpm" was updated to rpm 4.18.0 alpha .
This seems to affect current gem based packaing of ours.
Mainly: "%setup -q" for foo-%version.gem places foo-%version.gemspec on
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/02/15 1:35:
Dne 10. 02. 22 v 13:36 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
I've upgraded rubygem-rspec (and its friends: rspec-core, rspec-expectations,
rspec-mocks, rspec-support) to 3.11.0. Please try using this, thank you.
Note that the change Vít
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
I've upgraded rubygem-rspec (and its friends: rspec-core, rspec-expectations,
rspec-mocks, rspec-support) to 3.11.0. Please try using this, thank you.
Note that the change Vít previously mentioned (i.e.
https://github.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/issues/1460
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/02/07 22:45:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/02/07 20:24:
Dear Mamoru,
Could you please check the following two packages which recently started to
fail?
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-webmock?collection=f36
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/02/07 20:24:
Dear Mamoru,
Could you please check the following two packages which recently started to
fail?
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-webmock?collection=f36
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-websocket-extensions?collection=f36
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/01/28 5:12:
Dne 27. 01. 22 v 14:23 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/01/27 22:05:
Thank you! Now I vote for merging into f36 buildroot.
Should be done now:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-5a660a2215
With exception of player
Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/02/01 23:08:
Dear maintainers.
Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages
should be retired from Fedora 36 approximately one week before branching.
However, 5 weekly reminders are required and I forgot to start this sooner,
hence
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
I've orphaned rubygem-ruby-ntlm .
Currently repoquery shows no package uses this package uses this packages
either on
BuildRequires or Requires. On rawhide, this package FTBFS because this package
uses OpenSSL::Digest::MD4 and OpenSSL::Cipher::DES , which does not seem
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
With PR: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-rspec-core/pull-request/4
I removed rubygem(rake) Requires (when using on koji buildroot) on:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-rspec-core/c/15e3de8d5ccf32c7199d9f39e45d536fa6159a48?branch=rawhide
Note that some
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/01/27 22:05:
Dne 27. 01. 22 v 13:50 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/01/27 21:37:
Dne 27. 01. 22 v 11:50 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 27. 01. 22 v 11:14 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
7 rubygem-ffi-1.15.5-1.fc36.src.rpm
https
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/01/27 21:37:
Dne 27. 01. 22 v 11:50 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 27. 01. 22 v 11:14 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
7 rubygem-ffi-1.15.5-1.fc36.src.rpm
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81980984
%check stage fails with SIGABRT. Even build for rawhide
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/01/26 21:59:
So Fedora mass rebuild has finished (although I am not sure how does it look
with the signing of the packages), therefore we should be good to go. I have
requested side tag:
$ fedpkg request-side-tag
Side tag 'f36-build-side-49941' (id 49941) created.
Pavel Valena wrote on 2022/01/27 1:12:
I've started my mass rebuild script[1] which will build all the
packages in the ruby-packagers-sig [2] and also which I own [3]. The
scratch build, along with other checks[*] is done prior to that, of
course.
Here [4] is the list of currently targeted
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/01/26 21:59:
So Fedora mass rebuild has finished (although I am not sure how does it look
with the signing of the packages), therefore we should be good to go. I have
requested side tag:
$ fedpkg request-side-tag
Side tag 'f36-build-side-49941' (id 49941) created.
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/01/19 22:27:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/01/19 19:54:
Dne 19. 01. 22 v 9:08 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:39 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 18. 01. 22 v 12:00 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 4:27 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 17. 01
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/01/22 20:28:
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
So looks like there is really a lot of rebuild failure on rubygems related
packages - and many of them contains:
Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gjYYrb
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gjYYrb
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
So looks like there is really a lot of rebuild failure on rubygems related
packages - and many of them contains:
Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gjYYrb
+ umask 022
+ cd /builddir/build/BUILD
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.gjYYrb: line 31: syntax error near unexpected
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/01/19 19:54:
Dne 19. 01. 22 v 9:08 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:39 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 18. 01. 22 v 12:00 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 4:27 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 17. 01. 22 v 16:15 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi,
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/01/18 17:15:
Dne 18. 01. 22 v 8:44 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/01/18 0:15:
Hi,
It is time of the year when new version of Ruby was released upstream and we should land
it in Fedora. Unfortunately, the change proposal was approved just last
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2022/01/18 0:15:
Hi,
It is time of the year when new version of Ruby was released upstream and we should land
it in Fedora. Unfortunately, the change proposal was approved just last Thursday and on
top of that, rebase of libffi broke Ruby (I am going to disable the
Jarek Prokop wrote on 2022/01/17 7:40:
On 1/14/22 12:40, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Hello, all:
Jarek Prokop wrote on 2022/01/13 2:17:
Hi,
On 1/12/22 12:34, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Jarek,
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-aruba/pull-request/2
Considering the Aruba ticket ^^, I am
Hello, all:
Jarek Prokop wrote on 2022/01/13 2:17:
Hi,
On 1/12/22 12:34, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Jarek,
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-aruba/pull-request/2
Considering the Aruba ticket ^^, I am not sure if every party understands that
you are testing the changes in the side-tag
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2021/12/06 22:02:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2021/12/06 20:07:
Dne 03. 12. 21 v 21:36 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 2:23 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 03. 12. 21 v 13:40 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 1:20 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 03. 12
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2021/12/06 20:07:
Dne 03. 12. 21 v 21:36 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 2:23 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 03. 12. 21 v 13:40 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 1:20 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 03. 12. 21 v 11:47 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
Hello,
Jun Aruga wrote on 2021/09/28 1:54:
Just FYI
It seems the rpms/ruby rawhide started to fail to build from the
following build.
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/11069282
autoconf: 2.69-37.fc35 => 2.71-1.fc36
I noticed this when I also saw the build started to fail on the
stream-ruby-2.6
Hello, all:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2021/04/07 22:56:
Dne 07. 04. 21 v 13:47 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
Since rspec 3.0.0 is released on 2014/Jun (almost 7 years ago),
Fedora's rubygem-rspec is upgraded to 3.x on Fedora 22 era, and compat package
rubygem-rspec2
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
Since rspec 3.0.0 is released on 2014/Jun (almost 7 years ago),
Fedora's rubygem-rspec is upgraded to 3.x on Fedora 22 era, and compat package
rubygem-rspec2 is introduced.
Since I think enough time is already passed for packages to migrate to
rspec 3.x and actually:
Hello:
Miro Hrončok wrote on 2021/04/01 6:45:
On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote:
* Strict checking for unpackaged content in builds
> ...
* Many existing packages will fail to build due to the stricter
buildroot content checking. Fixing this in the packaging is always
backwards
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
After a long delay, I've finally updated net-http-persistent to 4.0.1
on rawhide/f34, and also I've modified packages which directly depend on
net-http-persistent:
- rubygem-mechanize : actually not modified
- rubygem-rubygems-mirror:
code itself already supports
Fabio Valentini wrote on 2021/02/14 4:29:
Hi everybody,
With a heavy heart, I have orphaned all my Ruby packages today.
- rubygem-kramdown-parser-gfm (kramdown support for GitHub-flavored markdown)
- rubygem-kramdown-syntax-coderay (coderay syntax highlighting support)
- rubygem-rouge (jekyll
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2021/01/07 16:54:
Some test failure
=
6 rubygem-ox-2.12.1-3.fc33.src.rpm
build fails:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=59091142
Failures like:
Error: test_array_multi(Func
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2021/01/07 22:41:
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2021/01/07 16:54:
Current leftovers (wrt library dependency issue):
$ dnf repoquery --repo=koji-ruby30 --qf '%{sourcerpm}' --whatrequires
"libruby.so.2.7()(64bit)"
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2021/01/07 16:54:
Current leftovers (wrt library dependency issue):
$ dnf repoquery --repo=koji-ruby30 --qf '%{sourcerpm}' --whatrequires
"libruby.so.2.7()(64bit)" | cat -n
=
3 libyui-bind
Pavel Valena wrote on 2021/01/07 14:19:
- Original Message -
From: "Vít Ondruch"
To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 7:23:36 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0 - Mass rebuild
The PR was merged and should be available in the side tag. Should anybody
package
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
Before upcoming F-34 mass build, I've upgraded rubygem-rspec suite to
3.10.0.
I don't expect any significant difference from 3.9.x as far as I looked at
the code briefly, but please test your packages with new rspec.
Regards,
Mamoru
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2020/11/13 19:18:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2020/11/13 17:46:
Dne 13. 11. 20 v 3:56 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: "Pavel Valena"
To: "Dan Čermák"
Cc: "Ruby SIG mailing list"
Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 8:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2020/11/13 17:46:
Dne 13. 11. 20 v 3:56 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
- Original Message -
From: "Pavel Valena"
To: "Dan Čermák"
Cc: "Ruby SIG mailing list"
Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 8:30:25 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
- Original Message -
From: "Dan
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
rubygem-kramdown before 2.3.0 has security issue assigned as CVE-2020-14001 :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858395 ,
so I've pushed updates rubygem-kramdown-2.2.1-4.fc32 for Fedora 32, and
rubygem-kramdown-1.17.0-6.fc31 for Fedora 31.
For EPEL(7), as I've
Pavel Valena wrote on 2020/10/13 21:00:
- Original Message -
From: "Vít Ondruch"
To: ruby-sig@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, October 9, 2020 1:52:07 PM
Subject: Re: Ruby 3.0
Hi all,
Another update to the most recent version of Ruby 3.0 is here:
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2020/01/18 15:33:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2020/01/17 0:00:
Hi everybody,
This years schedule does not give us too much freedom, because the
Fedora mass rebuild is scheduled for the 22nd of January, which is in a
few days. There are also some concerns with keyword arguments
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2020/01/20 22:24:
Dne 20. 01. 20 v 14:02 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Hi Mamoru,
Dne 20. 01. 20 v 12:37 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2020/01/18 15:33:
Thank you (and thanks to other people) for excellent works to bring
ruby 2.7 into Fedora 32. As Vít says
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2020/01/18 15:33:
Thank you (and thanks to other people) for excellent works to bring
ruby 2.7 into Fedora 32. As Vít says, the rebuilt packages can be seen on:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0=17977=-build_id=1
92 packages were already rebuilt
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2020/01/18 15:33:
14 rubygem-qpid_messaging-1.39.0-4.fc31.src.rpm
DEBUG util.py:596: No matching package to install: 'qpid-cpp-client-devel'
DEBUG util.py:596: Not all dependencies satisfied
Looks line qpid-cpp is retired, someone needs taking care of depending
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2020/01/17 0:00:
Hi everybody,
This years schedule does not give us too much freedom, because the
Fedora mass rebuild is scheduled for the 22nd of January, which is in a
few days. There are also some concerns with keyword arguments, but since
I have no idea how problematic
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
Pavel Valena wrote on 2019/12/05 1:50:
Currently, I've experimentally built Rspec 3.9, and I'm trying to enable tests,
and I'm getting:
Anyway now I've updated rspec suites to 3.9.0 on rawhide (F32),
- rubygem-rspec
- rubygem-rspec-core
- rubygem-rspec-mocks
-
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
