Dne 1.6.2011 21:09, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
On 05/26/2011 06:40 PM, Christopher McCrory wrote:
Hello...
Now that I work in a ruby shop, I took some time and built ruby 1.9.2
rpms. Most of my experience with ruby is running puppet so YMMV.
http://rubyrepo.elctech.com/
feedback welcome.
Hey all,
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
This is the way how we should proceed, i.e. the 1.9.2 should become
default. Later we can consider what to do with 1.8 ...
I wonder what do you guys think about the Debian approach:
Hi,
On 06/02/11 23:37, Christopher McCrory wrote:
correct. Changing the spec file to install in parallel isn't hard.
IIRC, add --suffix=192, append 192 in a few places, and exclude
libruby.so . But I found that either ruby without gems is not very
useful :( One of my goals is to get a
Hi,
On 05/27/11 00:40, Christopher McCrory wrote:
Hello...
Now that I work in a ruby shop, I took some time and built ruby 1.9.2
rpms. Most of my experience with ruby is running puppet so YMMV.
http://rubyrepo.elctech.com/
feedback welcome.
Do you have the SRPM / spec somewhere ?
Hello...
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 14:04 +0200, Michal Babej wrote:
Hi,
On 05/27/11 00:40, Christopher McCrory wrote:
Hello...
Now that I work in a ruby shop, I took some time and built ruby 1.9.2
rpms. Most of my experience with ruby is running puppet so YMMV.
Hello...
Now that I work in a ruby shop, I took some time and built ruby 1.9.2
rpms. Most of my experience with ruby is running puppet so YMMV.
http://rubyrepo.elctech.com/
feedback welcome.
--
Christopher McCrory
To the optimist, the glass is half full.
To the pessimist, the glass is
