> Yes, we should (we must) have one sane default if we want to keep it
> simple (packaging/installing/using), but who's saying that the actual
> default is the best sane default to deliver in average? Who and how it
> is decided?
>
It would seem to me that the standard ruby should be the default
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Sergio Rubio wrote:
> 2011/7/29 Guillermo Gómez :
>>> Tell me why I, as an end user, should care if you application is running
>>> with Ruby 1.8, Ruby 1.9, REE, Rubinius or JRuby?
>>> Tell me why I, as a Fedora package, should care about my gem for more
>>> Ruby im
2011/7/29 Guillermo Gómez :
>> Tell me why I, as an end user, should care if you application is running
>> with Ruby 1.8, Ruby 1.9, REE, Rubinius or JRuby?
>> Tell me why I, as a Fedora package, should care about my gem for more
>> Ruby implementations/versions?
>
> I had to say that from what i kn
> Tell me why I, as an end user, should care if you application is running
> with Ruby 1.8, Ruby 1.9, REE, Rubinius or JRuby?
> Tell me why I, as a Fedora package, should care about my gem for more
> Ruby implementations/versions?
I had to say that from what i know (which is not much), jruby is
re
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hello Sergio,
>
> Any proposal like this just over-complicate things. You are looking on
> Fedora from upstream developer point of view while our users just wants
> to use software. So at the end, if your application supports Ruby which
> are s
Hello Sergio,
Any proposal like this just over-complicate things. You are looking on
Fedora from upstream developer point of view while our users just wants
to use software. So at the end, if your application supports Ruby which
are shipped with Fedora, then it is enough for you and for end use
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Chris Lalancette wrote:
> On 07/28/11 - 12:09:58PM, Sergio Rubio wrote:
>
> My personal view is that per Fedora release cycle, we should have a single
> stack of ruby + rubygems that is "known good". For example, on Fedora 16 we
> are going to be shipping ruby 1
On 07/28/11 - 12:09:58PM, Sergio Rubio wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've been working lately in ruby packages for 1.8, 1.9,REE and
> Rubinius that install in parallel and a ruby-base package that
> basically pulls upstream ruby package (standard fedora/RHEL ruby) and
> provides a script to switch between
Hey all,
I've been working lately in ruby packages for 1.8, 1.9,REE and
Rubinius that install in parallel and a ruby-base package that
basically pulls upstream ruby package (standard fedora/RHEL ruby) and
provides a script to switch between different ruby implementations
when available.
I've also
