Re: Rails 3.0.3 RPMs for F15

2011-01-14 Thread Mohammed Morsi
On 01/14/2011 11:38 AM, Michael Stahnke wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Mohammed Morsi wrote: >> On 01/14/2011 04:08 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> Dne 14.1.2011 09:50, Mohammed Morsi napsal(a): On 01/14/2011 02:58 AM, Mohammed Morsi wrote: > On 01/12/2011 11:29 AM, V

Re: Rails 3.0.3 RPMs for F15

2011-01-14 Thread Michael Stahnke
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Mohammed Morsi wrote: >  On 01/14/2011 04:08 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 14.1.2011 09:50, Mohammed Morsi napsal(a): >>>     On 01/14/2011 02:58 AM, Mohammed Morsi wrote:      On 01/12/2011 11:29 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Are we really going to replace Rai

Re: Rails 3.0.3 RPMs for F15

2011-01-14 Thread Mohammed Morsi
On 01/14/2011 04:08 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 14.1.2011 09:50, Mohammed Morsi napsal(a): >> On 01/14/2011 02:58 AM, Mohammed Morsi wrote: >>> On 01/12/2011 11:29 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Are we really going to replace Rails 2.x with Rails 3.0.x or should they live side by side

Re: Rails 3.0.3 RPMs for F15

2011-01-14 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 14.1.2011 09:50, Mohammed Morsi napsal(a): >On 01/14/2011 02:58 AM, Mohammed Morsi wrote: >> On 01/12/2011 11:29 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> Are we really going to replace Rails 2.x with Rails 3.0.x or should they >>> live side by side? Your specs shows the later and I am also fan of the

Re: Rails 3.0.3 RPMs for F15

2011-01-14 Thread Mohammed Morsi
On 01/14/2011 02:58 AM, Mohammed Morsi wrote: >On 01/12/2011 11:29 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Are we really going to replace Rails 2.x with Rails 3.0.x or should they >> live side by side? Your specs shows the later and I am also fan of the >> later. However, I am not sure everybody else will

Re: Rails 3.0.3 RPMs for F15

2011-01-13 Thread Mohammed Morsi
On 01/12/2011 11:29 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Are we really going to replace Rails 2.x with Rails 3.0.x or should they > live side by side? Your specs shows the later and I am also fan of the > later. However, I am not sure everybody else will be happy with this > step. Was it discussed before? So

Re: Rails 3.0.3 RPMs for F15

2011-01-12 Thread Minnikhanov
On Tue, 2011-01-11 at 13:11 -0500, Mohammed Morsi wrote: > I created a public google docs spreadsheet to better visualize and track > these changes, as well as any more to update the various gem rpms in > Fedora to be compatible w/ the the Rails 3 ones. > > https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?k

Re: Rails 3.0.3 RPMs for F15

2011-01-12 Thread Vít Ondruch
Are we really going to replace Rails 2.x with Rails 3.0.x or should they live side by side? Your specs shows the later and I am also fan of the later. However, I am not sure everybody else will be happy with this step. Was it discussed before? Sorry, I am not following Fedora Rails development

Re: Rails 3.0.3 RPMs for F15

2011-01-11 Thread Mamoru Tasaka
Hello, Mommamed and all: > Please take a look at these rpms if you can, the more eyes we get on > them the better. Unless I receive any negative feedback or if I don't > get any at all, I'll update these rpms in rawhide by the end of the week > (the latest I want to get this all done is by the Fed

Re: Rails 3.0.3 RPMs for F15

2011-01-11 Thread Mohammed Morsi
On 01/11/2011 01:11 PM, Mohammed Morsi wrote: > > > Actionpack: > http://mo.morsi.org/files/rpms/rubygem-activerecord.spec Sorry this link should be http://mo.morsi.org/files/rpms/rubygem-actionpack-3.0.3-1.fc14.src.rpm > > > > Also rubygem-minitext, owned by mkent needs to be updated > http

Rails 3.0.3 RPMs for F15

2011-01-11 Thread Mohammed Morsi
The Rails 3.0.3 RPMs for Fedora are just about ready to go. Please look at and review the Specs and SRPMs below: Rails: http://mo.morsi.org/files/rpms/rubygem-rails-3.0.3-1.fc14.src.rpm http://mo.morsi.org/files/rpms/rubygem-rails.spec Activesupport: http://mo.morsi.org/files/rpms/rubygem-acti